IBJNews

Sallie Mae's job cuts spare Indiana, at least for now

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Sallie Mae says a new law that cuts banks out of the federal student-loan business is costing 2,500 workers their jobs, but the job eliminations will spare workers in Indiana—at least for the rest of the year.

The nation's largest student lender has told 1,200 staffers in service centers in Killeen, Texas, and Panama City, Fla., they will lose their jobs by the year's end.

The remaining cuts will follow in 2011, resulting in nearly a third of the company's total work force of 8,000 losing their jobs. The company did not specify where the job cuts will be made in 2011.

Sallie Mae, which is based in Reston, Va., employs about 2,500 people in Indiana, including 1,700 in Fishers.

The company has dramatically reduced its private loan originations as a result of tighter underwriting standards. It did not specify how much that factored into the job cuts.

Sallie Mae says the cuts result from changes made to the federal student loan program as part of the health care reform signed by President Barack Obama last month.

The law strips the middleman role in student lending away from banks. Lawmakers expect to save at least $60 billion in fees that went to banks to process government-backed student loans.

Sallie Mae, which wrote a record $7.7 billion in federal student loans in the first three months of the year, says it will also mean a drastic reshaping of the company.

"Ironically, one quarter before the government takes over loan originations, Sallie Mae broke its own (federal student loan) origination record," Sallie Mae Chairman and CEO Albert L. Lord said in the company's earnings announcement.

The law is "not good for the company and it's certainly not good for the employees," the CEO added during a conference call to discuss the results last week. Losing federal student loans will result in a "draconian drop" in income from loan originations, Lord said.

Sallie Mae intensified its lobbying in the months before the law was passed. The company spent $1.9 million in this year's first quarter working to present its views to lawmakers on the student loan bill and other consumer finance laws.

Like other private lenders, Sallie Mae will still will make student loans that are not backed by the government. It wrote private education loans totaling $840 million during the first quarter, down from $1.5 billion a year ago. The company said the reduction was due to tighter underwriting standards and increases in federal education programs.

Sallie Mae Chief Financial Officer John F. Remondi said during the conference call that there's an "enormous increase" in federal lending and grants this year—he estimated the pool of funding available to students jumped $17 billion for the first half of the year alone.

"We strongly advocate that students take advantage of grants first, free money first, and federal loans second," Remondi said. "And they are doing that appropriately, and as a result, private credit demand is down."

The federal Department of Education disputed Sallie Mae's claim that the job cuts are all due to the change in the law.

The department said it has a $50 million fund available to help workers at companies like Sallie Mae transition from writing loans to servicing them—or handling payments and collections.

"Loan servicing is a growth business and we hope lenders like Sallie Mae can help play an important role," the agency said in an e-mailed statement.

Sallie Mae is one of four companies that won contracts with the Education Department for servicing some $550 billion in outstanding federally backed loans. The department said these companies will also service future loans.

The contracts are performance-based, and Remondi said during the conference call Sallie Mae is the largest collector. "As we continue to demonstrate our performance in that space, we will continue to see increased market share," he said.

The Education Department said Sallie Mae was paid about $18.9 million for servicing work since September.

Sallie Mae is also keeping an eye on legislation now being discussed by Congress that would allow private student loans to be discharged, or wiped clean, through bankruptcy.

The company said 85 percent of the private loans it wrote in the first quarter and 55 percent of the private loans in its portfolio were co-signed, meaning parents or others share responsibility for paying them back with students. Such loans would be protected if the new bankruptcy rules pass, except for unlikely situations where both parents and students declare bankruptcy, Remondi said.

However, any legislation making it possible to get out of school and not repay student lending would serve to make lending standards even tighter, he maintained. "It will very much constrict the supply of credit to students."

Sallie Mae last week reported a first-quarter profit of $240.1 million, or 45 cents per share, after paying preferred dividends. That compared with a loss of $21.4 million, or 10 cents per share, in the 2009 first quarter.

The results included restructuring charges of $19 million related to the job cuts.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT