IBJNews

Securities firm Stifel Nicolaus balks at fraud charge

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Secretary of State Todd Rokita’s high-profile securities-fraud case against St. Louis-based Stifel Nicolaus & Co. has thrown the spotlight on a question hanging over the entire securities industry:

Should firms and their financial advisers have anticipated the potential collapse of the market for an obscure form of bonds known as auction-rate securities?

Rokita, a Republican, filed an administrative complaint against Stifel Oct. 1, charging the firm and its financial advisers failed to disclose the risks of the securities to 142 Hoosiers who invested $55 million.

The case ensnares a Carmel-based advisory team led by Dave Knall and Jeff Cohen, which oversees billions of dollars on behalf of many of the state’s wealthiest businesspeople.

They and other Stifel advisers aren’t personally on the line in the case, which targets only the firm. Transactions cited in the complaint involved advisers scattered across Stifel’s seven Indiana offices, though two-thirds were Cohen’s clients. Those clients accounted for 80 percent of the money.

Auction-rate securities are bonds whose interest rates are meant to be reset regularly at daily, weekly or monthly auctions. Many financial firms marketed them as safe, liquid and cash-like investments. But when credit markets seized up as the recession deepened last year, auctions began to fail, freezing the $200 billion market and leaving investors unable to access their money.

Because only a handful of previous auctions ever had failed, many investors considered the securities a safe form of temporary financing—essentially a better-yielding alternative to money market accounts.

Stifel CEO Ronald Kruszewski said his firm did nothing wrong.

“Hindsight’s always 20/20,” he said. “No one anticipated a complete market collapse. It’s just that simple. And to say you committed fraud by not disclosing an unknown risk can only be true with the benefit of hindsight.”

To provide liquidity to its clients, Stifel earlier this year offered to buy back all their auction-rate securities at face value over three years—a deal Kruszewski said was accepted by 100 percent of Hoosier clients.

That seemed to be a fair resolution, said Mark Maddox, an Indianapolis securities attorney who advised his clients to accept the offer.

“I thought it was a good and reasonable solution to a problem that was really much bigger than Stifel,” Maddox said. “In a situation where the investors have been given that kind of buyback plan, I’m not sure what the regulatory concern is from the state of Indiana.”

But Rokita told IBJ he believes he’s fully justified in pressing forward.

He said complaints from Stifel customers spurred the investigation. His complaint threatens penalties as harsh as permanently barring Stifel from the securities industry in Indiana.

“It’s like every one of our cases. It’s driven by the evidence,” he said. “And there’s strong evidence here there was no training and lack of supervision by Stifel.”

Some of Cohen’s clients say Rokita is overreaching.

“They haven’t stolen the funds. They haven’t misrepresented the funds. We’ve hit a little bump in the road in the investment market. And anybody that’s an investor is going to be subject to risks,” said retired real estate developer Tom Rush. “That’s our system, and something we should all be aware of.”

Other Stifel clients pointed out their auction-rate holdings were a tiny slice of much larger portfolios, and said they were well aware of their risks.

“I made an investment decision. It’s nobody’s fault but my own,” said Gene Zink, a former Duke Realty Corp. executive who now is CEO of Strategic Capital Partners LLC. “And I think Jeff and Dave worked tirelessly to find a solution.”

Some of Cohen’s clients said they suspect Rokita, 39, is playing tough in part to improve his political prospects. His second term as secretary of state ends next year, and by law he can’t run again.

The job is a traditional stepping stone to higher office. Rokita hasn’t declared himself in any race and said he doesn’t know if he’ll run next for “dogcatcher or governor.” Even so, he’s raising campaign contributions and recently held a golf outing to that end.

None of that has anything to do with his case against Stifel, Rokita said.

“[Stifel’s auction-rate buyback agreement] still doesn’t address the lack of supervision, the lack of training and selling unsuitable securities,” he said. “That’s not the standard of care. That’s not the duty houses have to their clients, that when caught they make them whole.”

According to the complaint, Stifel held weekly phone calls with institutional clients that included a discussion of the risks of auction-rate securities. But the state charges procedures and training were lax for the advisers working with retail customers.

“None of this is a surprise to Stifel or really anyone in their industry,” Rokita said, pointing out he issued his complaint the same day Colorado released its own over Stifel’s auction-rate procedures.

“There’s been national discussion and settlement among other companies,” he said. “They’ve been charged with this civilly in other states.”

Some firms have gone further than Stifel and agreed to repurchase all auction-rate securities immediately. But most of those are heavyweights on Wall Street, such as Merrill Lynch and Morgan Stanley, that received big cash infusions under the Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP. Stifel, a comparatively small firm with $90 billion in client assets, did not seek TARP funding.

The investment firms and their clients weren’t alone in getting stung when the auction-rate market collapsed. The state of Indiana was forced to pay higher interest costs after auction-rate securities issued for construction of Lucas Oil Stadium froze up. Local hospital systems also saw costs rise.

Indiana University business professor Charles Trzcinka doesn’t buy that the meltdown was entirely unforeseeable.

“People look at history and say the past predicts the future. It does sometimes, but sometimes it doesn’t. The turkey walks around well fed and thinks the world is wonderful until Thanksgiving and something changes,” he said.

“This is a turkey-at-Thanksgiving problem. The world was inferring from the past these were wonderful securities that had all this future, safe and easy, and they weren’t looking at the contract itself and what can happen.”•

ADVERTISEMENT

  • James Lowery
    I have known both Mr. Cohen and Mr. Knall for a long time and have witnessed their unbelievable work ethic and attention to detail. Every client in their office is warned of the risk of every investment before they put any money. Both of these men are all about integrity and hard work.

    Then again they are the best at what they do and that is what our media does is try and beat down those at the top.
  • Jeff Cohen
    I have known Jeff Cohen for many years and have appreciated his honesty and integrity. Every client is always warned of the risks they face. I find again, that the IBJ is creating a witch hunt with no basis in fact. Perhaps you should hire some reporters with a business background. Your coverage of a honest hardworking man is despicable.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So as I read this the one question that continues to come to me to ask is. Didn't Indiana only have a couple of exchanges for people to opt into which were very high because we really didn't want to expect the plan. So was this study done during that time and if so then I can understand these numbers. I also understand that we have now opened up for more options for hoosiers to choose from. Please correct if I'm wrong and if I'm not why was this not part of the story so that true overview could be taken away and not just parts of it to continue this negative tone against the ACA. I look forward to the clarity.

  2. It's really very simple. All forms of transportation are subsidized. All of them. Your tax money already goes toward every single form of transportation in the state. It is not a bad thing to put tax money toward mass transit. The state spends over 1,000,000,000 (yes billion) on roadway expansions and maintenance every single year. If you want to cry foul over anything cry foul over the overbuilding of highways which only serve people who can afford their own automobile.

  3. So instead of subsidizing a project with a market-driven scope, you suggest we subsidize a project that is way out of line with anything that can be economically sustainable just so we can have a better-looking skyline?

  4. Downtowner, if Cummins isn't getting expedited permitting and tax breaks to "do what they do", then I'd be happy with letting the market decide. But that isn't the case, is it?

  5. Patty, this commuter line provides a way for workers (willing to work lower wages) to get from Marion county to Hamilton county. These people are running your restaurants, hotels, hospitals, and retail stores. I don't see a lot of residents of Carmel working these jobs.

ADVERTISEMENT