IBJNews

Shelbyville casino could exit bankruptcy in August

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis Downs LLC, the operator of a horserace track and casino in Shelbyville, could exit Chapter 11 at the end of August, under procedures approved Thursday by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Delaware.

The track’s owner filed a reorganization plan in April that was negotiated with second-lien creditors and Fortress Investment Group LLC. The plan calls for selling the facility if the price is acceptable to the second-lien creditors. Otherwise, the plan will give ownership mostly to second-lien lenders.

Indianapolis Downs fielded several offers for the property earlier this year, but they weren’t high enough to suit the troubled company or its creditors.

On Thursday, the bankruptcy judge approved the disclosure statement explaining the plan. The judge also gave his stamp of approval for auction procedures. The disclosure statement provides pertinent information about the plan.

Bids must be submitted by July 20, and an auction will be conducted on July 31 if acceptable bids are offered. Although prospective buyers have been negotiating and submitting offers, none so far is acceptable to the second-lien lenders, according to the disclosure statement.

Creditors can't vote on the plan until July 31. The confirmation hearing for approval of the plan is set for Aug. 22.

The plan provides that if there isn’t a third-party buyer, the loan of about $100 million financing the Chapter 11 case will be paid off. Second-lien lenders will receive a new second-lien term loan, 95 percent of Class A warrants, and 95 percent of a new unsecured term loan paying interest with more debt. If there is an acceptable sale price to a third party, second-lien creditors will receive the proceeds, less an agreed amount earmarked for third-lien creditors.

If there is a sale, third-lien creditors are to receive the agreed amount from second-lien creditors plus the surplus if the second-lien is fully paid. Absent a sale, third-lien creditors will receive 5 percent of the new unsecured term loan, 5 percent of the Class A warrants, and all of the Class B warrants.

Unsecured creditors, with claims that may total from $9 million to $24 million, are not to receive anything.

The track missed an interest payment in November 2010 on $375 million in second-lien notes. The reorganization begun in April 2011 is being financed with a $103.1 million loan from the existing first-lien lenders, with Wells Fargo Bank NA as agent. Secured liabilities of the so-called racino include $98.1 million owing on the first-lien financing, $375 million outstanding on the second-lien notes and $72.7 million on third-lien subordinated notes.

The Indiana Downs track opened in 2002. The casino began operations in 2008. The permanent facility opened in March 2009 with 2,000 slot machines and electronic table games. Revenue in 2010 was $270 million.

The petition says assets are more than $500 million while debt is less than $500 million.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT