IBJNews

Some of city's most successful money managers are father-son teams

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

All parents hope to teach their kids the value of money. Few end up successfully investing hundreds of millions of dollars together.

But for a handful of top local teams, wealth management is a family affair. Each began their financial lessons at home around the dinner table. Once the children were grown, they all evolved parental relationships into professional ones. And their success stories speak for themselves.

Locally based Cooke Financial Group of Wells Fargo & Co., for example, was founded in 1969 by patriarch John Cooke, 70, who started out as a stockbroker. Today, he shares the managing director title with sons Chris, 44, and Brian, 42. As a team, they manage $1 billion for wealthy individuals.

Another local financial advisory team involves 73-year-old Jack Klausner and his son, Jonathan, 42. Founded in 1958 as part of Thomson McKinnon, the team now manages about 500 accounts totaling $700 million under the moniker the Klausner and Duffy Investment Group at UBS. Jonathan Klausner has been working alongside his father since 1992.

The Auer Growth Fund was organized more recently, but father Bryan Auer, 73, and his sons Bob and Paul have been managing money together with spectacular returns for more than two decades. Starting in 1987, they took $100,000 Bryan Auer had saved in his IRA and, by 2007, grew it into $30 million. Using their same investment formula, two years ago they launched the Auer Growth Fund, a locally based mutual fund. It now has assets topping $159 million.

Indianapolis boasts quite a few top father-son money management teams. Dave Knall and his son Jamie lead the local office of St. Louis-based Stifel Nicolaus and Co. Don Goelzer founded locally-based Goelzer Investment Management in 1969. Now his son Greg is CEO. William Salin II is chairman and CEO of locally-based Salin Bank, which his father started in 1983.

It’s not uncommon for top money managers to groom their children to take over the businesses, said Michael White, president of Radnor, Pa.-based financial services consultancy Michael White Associates LLC. White’s dozens of well-known clients include American Express, Bank of America, Fidelity, Merrill Lynch, Raymond James and Wachovia.

Lengthy transitions

But a successful generational transition invariably takes years.

“Obviously, this isn’t something that happens overnight. You don’t just bring your kids in, get ’em licensed and turn ’em loose,” White said.

“You’re a bat boy, a second stringer sitting on the bench. Eventually, with practice and hard work, you’re on the field playing.”

At all three local businesses, the father-to-son changeover is decades in the making.

Bryan Auer, left, is passing decades of money management experiences to sons Bob Auer and Paul Auer. (IBJ Photo/Robin Jerstad)

“I attribute a ton of our family’s success to Dad’s willingness to be a great partner, and not always be Dad,” Chris Cooke said. “And I always attribute a ton of our success to Dad’s inspiring interest in investments from early on, and a work ethic as well.”

Chris Cooke remembers many mealtime discussions growing up at home about complicated financial topics, like the difference between Ginnie Mae and Fannie Mae. And to this day, he dreads yellow legal pads because that’s where his dad kept single-spaced lists of the chores planned for “every Saturday of my life.”

“I woke up knowing these were the 15 things we’d do, and until they were done, you didn’t visit your friends, watch TV or play video games. Friends would call the house to see if the chores were done before they’d come over, or they’d be roped in,” Chris Cooke said. “You’d wake up and learn, if I have a plan and accomplish it, there’s a reward for it. It’s a small life lesson, but life’s like that.”

Chris Cooke began working with his father 17 years ago, after earning both a law degree and, thanks to a stint at Ernst & Young, his CPA. His brother, a certified investment management analyst, followed about two years later. At first, Chris Cooke remembers, his father took the lead in meetings with clients, then slowly swapped roles until clients didn’t care which one was in the room anymore.

But to this day, Chris Cooke said, his father provides the Cooke Financial Group an advantage many wealth managers lack: deep historical perspective. Chris Cooke can remember running into his father’s office many times excited about a hot stock, only to be told to gather more research. After all, who’s likely to know more about it, his father would ask, you or somebody who’s paid to spend his entire career following the industry and regularly writes 30-page reports about it?

Jonathan Klausner recalls the day his dad came to visit his elementary school classroom. The other kids were immediately impressed with the dads who worked as policemen or firemen. But Jack Klausner, wearing his suit and tie, managed to equally wow them by talking about investments in products they knew and loved, like Coca Cola. His birthday gifts would always include a couple of shares of stock, which Jonathan Klausner then followed in the newspaper right along with the comics and the sports scores. During snow days and summer breaks, he filed paperwork in his father’s office and played with the stock quoting machine.

Jonathan Klausner
Jack Klausner

Like the Cooke boys, Jonathan Klausner didn’t join his father straight out of school. Instead, he took a job in Atlanta with Prudential Securities. It allowed him to develop his own work ethic and habits. The experience also taught Jonathan Klausner the value of access to his father’s book of clients. To build his own book in Atlanta, he’d had to make cold calls across the Southeast.

There have been plenty of reminders since. Jack Klausner’s half-century of knowledge offers a calming presence both for clients and his team in any crisis. It was particularly helpful after 9/11, Jonathan Klausner said, and at the height of the financial crisis last year.

“To have that anchor or safety net of a mature business behind you, it’s invaluable,” Jonathan Klausner said.

It’s a resource Klausner and Duffy likely will enjoy for many years to come.

“He still comes in every day. He must read at least two newspapers and maybe more. He gets on the phone, talks to clients, eats his lunch at his desk as he has the last 50 years running, and sometime during the afternoon he makes a decision to go home,” Jonathan Klausner said. “In the summertime, the golf course calls his name a little more often. But I don’t foresee him ever completely hanging it up.”

Bryan Auer also still comes to the office every morning, said his son Bob. Their story is unusual in that the pair built their $159 million in assets together starting toward the end of Bryan Auer’s first career as a self-employed sales representative for health and beauty aids.

Back in 1987, Bob Auer was proud to be working as a broker for Dean Witter. His dad had been personally investing with middling results for years. But when Bryan Auer brought his son $100,000 in retirement money to manage, he didn’t want to rely on Dean Witter’s research.

Instead, he planned to divide the cash into 100 blocks of $1,000, then pick stocks exclusively based on three factors: each company’s sales must be up at least 20 percent compared with the same quarter a year ago; its profits during the same period must be up 25 percent; but the price-to-equity ratio couldn’t rise above 12. At regular intervals, the worst performers that couldn’t keep up those metrics were discarded.

The key was discipline about when to sell. As soon as a stock’s price had doubled, Bob Auer said, it had to leave the portfolio—even if it was hot and on its way up. If, and only if, it still fit the original investment parameters, it could be repurchased.

Using this methodology, eight of the chains of buys and sells traceable back to the original 100 stocks made $1 million, and two chains made $2 million. Two years ago, Bob Auer used his father’s technique to launch the Auer Growth Fund, one of just three mutual funds headquartered in Indiana.

“I take no credit for the system. He developed it, the screening process,” Bob Auer said. “People, when they hear what happened, they don’t believe it. They assume you bought Microsoft and got to be the lucky monkey.”

Due diligence on children

White, the financial services consultant, suggests a few standard litmus tests to verify money managers’ children are as strong as their well-known fathers tout. Sharing a last name isn’t enough to prove a son is sharp at selecting stocks or bonds. Clients should feel no qualms about expecting him to earn formal money management education and professional designations, like the CFP or CFA, before taking over their account.

It’s perfectly OK, White said, to ask for client referrals, preferably accounts the son attracted and serviced on his own. And it’s always important to understand how any money manager is compensated—whether via portfolio management fees or through a commission percentage on the investment products he sells.

In some cases, White said, the conversion from father to son can actually produce better results. He likened it to a dentist who practices well for half a century, then sends his son off to dental school to learn all the most modern tools and techniques.

“You think sometimes there will be a lack of experience. Then you find out that the son … [knows] procedures and medications that will take care of you better than his father, because his father couldn’t even keep up on the literature,” White said. “You’re not necessarily going to find a clone of the father or the mother. Sometimes it can be an improvement.•

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT