IBJNews

State sits on prime downtown property near Statehouse

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Real estate developers have bigger ideas than state officials are ready to execute when it comes to a downtown parking lot near the Statehouse.

Three locally based firms responded to a state request for private-sector parking management, plus the construction of new spaces, by proposing mixed-use buildings for a 3.2-acre lot north of the Statehouse, according to response documents made public late last month.

Crossin Flaherty & Collins’ Jim Crossin says the state’s thoughtful pace allows for creative ideas.

The responses by Flaherty & Collins, Keystone Realty Group and Browning demonstrate the potential of the land, which is an entire city block bounded by Ohio Street, Senate Avenue, New York Street and Capitol Avenue.

Although the Indiana Finance Authority’s request for information sought “creative solutions” for the state’s employee-parking needs, Public Finance Director Kendra York said the state needs more time to weigh its options.

That could include having some experts evaluate the Ohio Street lot for its best use, York said. “We understand this is a big deal, a big thing to endeavor on.”

Jim Crossin, vice president of development at Flaherty, said he’s not disappointed by the lack of action on the request for information, or RFI, which was issued last fall. The RFI process is more open-ended than a request for proposals; the issuer is under no obligation to follow through.

“While they may be moving slow, that’s not dissimilar to what we see in other markets as government entities try to get their hands around something they’re not doing every day,” he said. “We think good ideas in the long run get put into place.”

Under a proposal estimated to cost $75 million, Flaherty & Collins would build 330 luxury apartments and 24,000 square feet of retail in a five-story building facing Ohio Street and overlooking the north side of the Statehouse.

Another parking lot sits between the Statehouse and the proposed mixed-use development, but Flaherty & Collins proposed replacing it with a park celebrating the state’s 2016 bicentennial.

Flaherty would put 140 semi-climate-controlled parking spaces below ground to make up for those lost to the new green space and build 330 parking spaces for apartment dwellers and 550 spaces for state employees in the mixed-use building.

Management of the state’s other parking garages was clearly secondary for Flaherty & Collins. The firm said it could come up with an expansion of the West Washington Street state parking garage, if that would provide an advantage in securing the surface-lot development.

Keystone’s proposal for the Ohio Street parking lot was not specific but mentioned a possible mix of retail, multi-family residential and office space. Such a project would be an “occasion that requires imagination and an ability to capitalize on a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.”

Browning’s response called for a garage with a new office building and a small retail component. Other details were redacted.

Representatives of Keystone and Browning did not respond to requests for comment.

parking-lot-map.gifDennis Dye, principal at TWG Development LLC, said he is glad to see the state take a cautious approach. Downtown is in the midst of a luxury-apartment-building boom, and he said he wouldn’t want to see another parcel developed along those lines until renters have taken up more of the hundreds of units set to become available, including in TWG’s Pulliam Square on Pennsylvania Street.

“We want to make sure there’s not too many units coming on at the same time,” Dye said.

The Indiana Finance Authority’s primary focus of the RFI issued last fall was to address parking needs in all or one of three state-owned facilities: the West Washington Street garage, the Senate Avenue garage and the parking lot north of the Statehouse.

The two garages and parking lot contain 6,096 spaces and generate $1 million a year from special events. Employee parking is free.

In addition to the surface lot, the state said it would make available 0.6 acre adjacent to the West Washington garage for new construction and that developers could build above the current sixth floor.

“There are no preconceived notions as to what additional structures or uses may be added to the basic garage expansion, and respondents are free to be creative,” the RFI stated.

The RFI contemplated both a “basic” and “enhanced” expansion of the West Washington garage.

Keystone said it could expand the Washington Street garage by 625 spaces and add a street-level commercial space that would complement the nearby JW Marriott hotel. Keystone also could go a step further and add a “mid-rise structure,” either multi-family residential or a hotel, on the north side of the garage.

Keystone said it would partner with Schmidt Associates, Walker Parking Consultants, American Structurepoint, Global Parking System of Indiana and LAZ Parking.

Browning lined up Denison Parking, Arsee Engineers Inc., CSO Architects and F.A. Wilhelm Construction Co. Inc.

Denison also submitted a stand-alone response for parking management. The Indianapolis-based firm, which owns or manages 30,000 spaces, said the state could save $200,000 to $300,000 a year on labor with the installation of new technology. Denison noted that the state is paying three cashiers to work the exit lanes in the Washington Street garage during the day, when there’s little traffic.

A fifth proposal came from Indianapolis-based Glenroy Construction, which would serve as a construction manager or owner’s representative.

York said that if the agency were to proceed with real estate development, it would likely issue a request for proposals.•
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Pence
    With Pence running the ship good luck with a new government building on the site. He does everything on the cheap except unnecessary roads line a new beltway( like we need that). Things like state of the art office buildings and light rail will never be seen as an asset to these types. They don't get that these are the things that help a city prosper.
  • low rise to short term gain
    Another developer wishing to build an unimpressive five story apartment with retail space. Another private company seeking a special interests republicans approval to buy State (Our) assets for a short term gain. This is an absolutely horrible plan. This is the State's property and it needs to be used for State business. The Statehouse is no longer big enough to manage the three branches of government. There should be a separate State Court building housing the State's appellate courts and State Court administration. Currently, the State leases premium space in the Hyatt and on Meridian Street. The State pays rent it would not have to if it owned a judicial building at this location. The real estate special interest and ignorance and greed of our current incumbents will likely sell off another citizen asset. More and more, Indiana and especially Indianapolis looks like a garage sale. Someday we will look back on our parking, our water, our property, and wonder why did we sell that? This land is the State's for the very purpose and necessity of expanding the space it will occupy. The only thing that has guaranteed value in this world is real estate. We own it. Please don't sell it. I have no idea why people vote these special interests politicians into office. How is there giving one private company a public income stream or property, good for main street. Stop pawn shopping our property.
  • Judicial Building
    The lot should be used to construct a state courts building to free up much needed space in the Statehouse and government center; it would house the supreme and appellate courts, the attorney general and other related judicial bodies. This is long overdue. Sadly it will probably be turned over for less than fair market value in a patronage deal like the "park" property was to Simon on the southside of the statehouse.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT