IBJNews

Stock tied to IPO catapults pay for Springleaf execs

May 24, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Evansville-based personal lender Springleaf Holdings Inc. paid its CEO $78.7 million in 2013 while another senior executive earned $39.5 million, according to U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filings.

The massive payouts come with caveats: The executives won’t be able to pocket most of the compensation for at least five years, and the payouts almost entirely depend on the firm’s performance on Wall Street.

springleaf-facts.gifThe payments—which made CEO Jay Levine and executive vice president John Anderson the state’s highest-paid executives last year—were prompted by the company’s $337 million initial public offering in October 2013.

The vast majority of Levine’s pay—$78.3 million of $78.7 million—came from stock awards. His salary was $400,000, which dipped from 2012, and he picked up another $10,200 in 401(k) contributions.

Anderson, executive vice president of capital markets, also had a stock-based payout, which represented $39.2 million of his compensation. His salary was $350,000 for the year, and he too received $10,200 in 401k contributions.

The board of directors wanted to give a significant ownership stake to the two executives to “retain their expertise” and “align their long-term financial interests with those of the Company and its shareholders,” the firm stated in its proxy statement filed April 29 with the SEC.

Contracts bar the men from selling any of their shares for five years, even though the stock vested immediately, said Craig Streem, Springleaf’s senior vice president of investor relations.

The stock awards were valued using the $17-per-share IPO price. But what the men actually reap will depend on how the shares perform going forward. So far, so good: The shares are trading at more than $22 apiece.

Levine, who is also a board member, owned about 2.6 percent of the company and Anderson held just over 1 percent at the time of the annual proxy filing.

Both paid taxes up front on the full stock value, Streem noted.

Springleaf also detailed compensation for three other top officers, all of whom earned a more modest base salary, topped off by company shares: Minchung Kgil, chief financial officer, earned $2.54 million; Bradford Borchers, executive vice president, earned $2.76 million; and David Hogan, chief risk and analytics officer and senior vice president, earned $2.86 million.

Levine, 52, has been at Springleaf since October 2011. He previously was CEO for Capmark Financial Group Inc., a commercial real estate finance firm in Pennsylvania. He held several management roles at Royal Bank of Scotland before Capmark.

Anderson, 55, also arrived at Springleaf in October 2011. He previously was managing director in the Asset Backed and Principal Finance Department of Royal Bank of Scotland.

Springleaf, which previously operated as American General Finance, took a hard hit in the Great Recession. Private equity investor Fortress Investment Group in 2010 acquired 80 percent of the business from American International Group Inc. The deal included $20 billion in assets and $18 billion in liabilities, most of it debt.

Springleaf lends to consumers, including subprime loans for cars and home remodeling, through 830 branch offices in 26 states. The company in 2013 began offering loans online. Springleaf also owns two insurance subsidiaries.

The company laid off hundreds of employees and made other cost cuts in recent years as management restructured the business to eliminate mortgage lending.

Performance has rebounded since the Fortress buyout and Levine and Anderson’s arrivals.

Springleaf finished 2013 with $93.7 million in profit, mainly because of non-controlling investments in other companies. Springleaf’s core operations recorded a $19.3 million loss for the year. But the company swung to a $68.6 million profit for the first quarter of 2014.•
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

ADVERTISEMENT