IBJNews

Crookall departure comes amid symphony restructuring

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The chairman of the Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra insists he knows of no specific reason behind the abrupt departure of CEO Simon Crookall after seven years.

In an interview Friday morning, board chairman John Thornburgh noted that the ISO’s former chief executive, Richard Hoffert, held the post for six years, and that seven years is a long tenure for such a demanding job.

“The only thing I’m aware of is he wanted to pursue some other opportunities,” he said of Crookall.

Crookall’s departure was announced Thursday evening and was effective immediately. He doesn’t appear to have a new job lined up, as he did not indicate where he’s headed next. He did not return a message left at his home.

The timing of the decision seemed surprising, given that the ISO is in the midst of a $100 million capital campaign. It’s also enjoying the national spotlight as host of “Late Night with Jimmy Fallon” at Hilbert Circle Theatre during Super Bowl festivities.

“In terms of the immediacy of the decision, that was a function of what Simon wanted to do,” Thornburgh said. “He has agreed to provide transition assistance.”

Finance vice president Jackie Groth will be interim CEO. Thornburgh said he expects the search to last at least six months, and hopes to find someone within a year.

Crookall, 51, has weathered controversy and financial pressure. He ousted former music director Mario Venzago in 2009 and brought in a new, young music director, Krzysztof Urbanski, in 2010.

The symphony struggled with operating losses following the 2008 financial crisis. At the ISO's annual meeting in November, Crookall said that with cost-cutting and increased fundraising, the ISO should have a balanced budget by the conclusion of the fiscal year ending Aug. 31, 2014.

The ISO's expenses of $25.6 million exceeded revenue by $1.7 million for the 2011 fiscal year. Last year's deficit was $1 million less than the previous year's and $1.1 million less than than the deficit two years ago.

A musicians’ representative said Crookall’s departure comes amid a larger shakeup in the management ranks. “They’re going through restructuring on the management side right now,” said Richard Graef, chairman of the orchestra committee. “It hasn’t just been Simon.”

In the past few weeks, the ISO has also parted ways with Martin Sher, vice president of artistic planning.

Graef said the departure came around the same time that the orchestra announced a new management structure with three vice presidents instead of six.

Thornburgh said the restructuring of the vice presidents' ranks was Crookall's decision. He expected Groth to assemble her own management team.

United Kingdom-based cultural commentator Norman Lebrecht speculated in a blog post that Music Director Krzysztof Urbanski played a role in Crookall’s departure. Citing anonymous sources, Lebrecht said Urbanski had objected to Sher’s firing.

Urbanski’s representative directed questions back to Thornburgh. “Krzysztof never publicly comments on issues related to orchestra administration,” said Jennifer Spencer, director at London-based HarrisonParrott in an e-mail.

Thornburgh said he wasn’t aware of Urbanski influencing Crookall’s decision to leave.

Musicians were not unhappy with Crookall, Graef said. “We respect what he’s done for the orchestra,” he said. “He’s given 150 percent, always.”

Crookall seemed to have at least a working relationship with the musicians. They agreed to a 12-percent pay cut in their last three-year contract, struck in October 2009, saving the ISO $4 million.

At the same time, Crookall took a 15-percent pay cut, and vice presidents took a 10-percent cut. Crookall was paid a base salary of $229,847 in the 2010 fiscal year with total compensation of $265,262.

The one blemish on Crookall’s record is failing to land significant donations, Graef said, although he added that the musicians don’t lay the blame with him. “It’s a very hard job.”

The capital campaign is overseen by vice president for development Sean Dunlavy, who shifted all his work to that project early in the year, Thornburgh said.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • @ listener re: why Simon left
    Oh, so THAT explains it!

    Thank goodness that's cleared up.
    Somebody alert Norman Lebrecht ...
  • IBJ makes it hard to make comments
    Why are some articles not available to everyone? I have no interesting subscribing to anything, but, I am interested in yiour articles. It seems silly to not have all of them available.
  • i know why he left
    at the last thursday night happy hour show featuring My Brightest Diamond the string trio Time for Three covered a U2 song and added a major chord change as a pre-chorus. it was awful. i booed and Simon quit. simple as that.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT