IBJNews

Uncollected pledges remain high for United Way

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Unpaid pledges are keeping United Way of Central Indiana from distributing as much money as it would like to local charities.

The blame continues to fall on a lackuster economy and the inability to collect from the paychecks of Hoosiers who lose their jobs after making the pledges.

The Indianapolis-based not-for-profit said Monday that it will distribute $34.6 million this year, including $21.7 million to 106 local charities. The amount is 3.6 percent less than last year.

United Way is providing fewer dollars in the fiscal year that started July 1 while holding back more in its reserves to cover uncollected pledges. It expects to contribute $2.65 million from its budget, or 6.9 percent of the $38.2 million raised overall in United Way’s 2010 campaign, to cover unpaid pledges from laid off employees.

That’s slightly better than the 7 percent United Way held back from the previous year’s campaign but still much higher than the 5 percent it typically reserves, United Way of Central Indiana CEO Ellen K. Annala said.

“Anytime we’re in a recession we have to up [the amount] a little bit, but we’ve had to up it more,” she said. “It’s just a reflection of what’s been going on in the economy.”

United Way of Central Indiana attracts more than 98 percent of its nearly 76,000 donors from workplace fundraising campaigns. It lost more than 6,000 donors from 2008 to 2009—likely as a result of layoffs during the economic downturn.

Indiana’s unemployment rate stood at 10 percent when United Way kicked off its latest annual campaign in August and improved to 8.2 percent by May. Still, the figure is much higher than the 4-percent to-5 percent jobless rate Indiana enjoyed before the economy began to swoon in mid-2008.

“We’ve seen [uncollectible pledges] go really high the past few years,” Annala said. “Too many people have lost their jobs and can’t pay their pledges.”

United Way agencies nationwide budget amounts for uncollected pledges based on percentages from the past three to five years and adjust them for current economic conditions, said Sal Fabens, spokesman for United Way Worldwide in Alexandria, Va.

United Way of Central Indiana is “right on par” with the national rate, which also is 7 percent, he said.

“Every United Way has to include an allowance for uncollectible pledges in their financials,” Fabens said. “There’s essentially always a difference between what people pledge and what actually comes in the door.”

The $38.2 million the local group raised during its last campaign fell short of its ambitious goal of $41 million. The organization responded by cuting operating expenses 6.2 percent.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Great article and post scripts by Mike L (Great addition to IBJ BTW). Bobby's stubborn as a mule, and doubt if he ever comes back to IU. But the love he would receive would be enormous. Hope he shows some time, but not counting on it.

  2. When the Indiana GOP was going around the State selling the Voucher bill they were promising people that the vouchers would only be for public charter schools. They lied. As usual.

  3. I am Mr. Morris Ray, a Legitimate And a Reputable money Lender. We lend funds out to individuals in need of financial assistance, we give loan to people that have a bad credit or in need of money to pay bills, to invest on business. Have you been looking for loan? you have not to worry, because you are in the right place i offer loan at low interest rate of 2% so if you are in need of a loan i want you to just contact me via this email Address: morris_ray123@outlook.com

  4. Jim, your "misleading" numbers comment is spot on. This is the spin these posers are putting on it. News flash, fans: these guys lie. They are not publicly traded so no one holds them accountable for anything they say. The TV numbers are so miniscule to begin with any "increase" produces double digit "growth" numbers. It's ridiculous to think that anything these guys have done has awakened the marketplace. What have they done? Consolidate the season so they run more races on consecutive weekends? And this creates "momentum." Is that the same momentum you enjoy when you don't race between August and March? Keep in mind that you are running teams who barely make ends meet ragged over the summer to accomplish this brilliant strategy of avoiding the NFL while you run your season finale at midnight on the East Coast. But I should not obfuscate my own point: any "ratings increase" is exactly what Jim points to - the increased availability of NBC Sports in households. Look fans, I love the sport to but these posers are running it off a cliff. Miles wants to declare victory and then run for Mayor. I could go on and on but bottom line for God's sake don't believe a word they say. Note to Anthony - try doing just a little research instead of reporting what these pretenders say and then offering an "opinion" no more informed than the average fan.

  5. If he's finally planning to do the right thing and resign, why not do it before the election? Waiting until after means what - s special election at tax payer expense? Appointment (by whom?) thus robbing the voters of their chance to choose? Does he accrue some additional financial advantage to waiting, like extra pension payments? What's in it for him? That's the question that needs to be asked.

ADVERTISEMENT