Indiana's plan to balance an unemployment insurance fund hit hard during the recession might have caused businesses to
pay more than they owed, although no one seems to know how many companies were involved or the level of impact it had on them.
Indiana Department of Workforce Development Auditor Cathy Luff said Tuesday that businesses she examined in 2011 had overpaid
because of confusion over when higher unemployment taxes approved by lawmakers in 2009 took effect.
Meanwhile, Luff said she was removed from her auditing duties last Thursday after talking with WISH-TV about her concerns.
A spokesman for the Department of Workforce Development said Luff is still employed by the state and has not been formally
disciplined in any way, but declined further comment citing personnel confidentiality.
Department Commissioner Scott Sanders said Monday that if companies did incorrectly calculate how much they owed the state,
it is up to them to let the department know and seek that money. He called it "a self-reporting process."
"So employers would need to go back and take a look at what they filed and if they filed incorrectly, by all means come
back and submit a corrected return," Sanders said. "We'll be happy to issue them a credit memo and a refund
if that's what they would like."
Neither Luff nor the department knows how many businesses overpaid the state or by how much. But of the 91 audits Luff performed
last year, roughly 15 percent of the businesses made this mistake. She said she cannot reveal the names of businesses she
audited because it is confidential information.
The state is obligated to help them get their money back, Luff said.
"I believe what happened is they don't want to give money back," she said Tuesday of the Department of Workforce
Development, citing the need to bring the state's unemployment fund back into solvency following the spike in unemployment
claims during the recession.
"At a minimum DWD should notify employers to go back and check to see if they reported correctly," she said.
The trouble stems from Indiana's efforts to repay roughly $2 billion in loans from the federal government to cover unemployment
costs as the recession hit. Lawmakers developed a two-pronged plan in 2009 to deal with the problem by increasing the tax
businesses pay into the insurance fund and increasing the amount of employee wages taxed from the first $7,000 earned by each
worker to the first $9,500.
That latter bump, in the amount taxed, is what caused the current problem. The new plan was set to take effect at the start
of 2010, but lawmakers delayed the tax hike a few months later, leaving businesses with the lower tax burden through 2010
— whether they knew it or not.
Both Luff and the Department of Workforce Development suspect the problem stems in part from businesses using software like
Quickbooks that was updated at the start of 2010 with information that was out-of-date after lawmakers delayed the tax hike
in March.
Because the companies file their own calculations, only state auditors such as Luff would have caught the mistake and the
department audited only 2.5 percent of employers last year.
Luff first discovered the problem last year when auditing payments for 2010 and reported it to her bosses at the department.
She said she decided to go to the media after the department did nothing to reduce her level of concern.
"It strikes me that there really is responsibility on both ends of this equation," said Craig Hartzer, a Department
of Workforce Development commissioner under former Gov. Frank O'Bannon.
It was up to businesses to be aware that the changes were coming, but the state was responsible for doing everything possible
to let them know, said Hartzer, who now teaches at Indiana University's public affairs school.
Democratic gubernatorial candidate John Gregg called the problem another example of mismanagement by the state, following
the discovery of $526 million in tax errors, and asked for an immediate audit of state government. But the unemployment insurance
problem appears to have little in common with the other, massive tax mistakes discovered by the state over the last half-year.

















IBJ Conversations
3 Comments
Add Comment
I would argue that, upon re-examination, many businesses would fail to recognize where they erred originally, and would remain unaware that a corrected return is in order.
The state's role in causing this material problem suggests that the state should initiate audits aimed at returning money that does not belong to the state, on behlaf of its businesses and citizens.
It was very confusing to employers receiving notice of the wage base increase and likely a notice of rate increase at the time.
This is another case of the state albeit IDWD reporting REVENUE that was not EARN (theirs).
Sound familiar like when all the employers make their WH-1 monthly filing and on page 2 (mind you electronically-on the state's own portal) they list the amount by county withheld out of employee's check to be paid to the respective county. You know the amount the state did not want to pay the counties.
If this scheme was done in the private sector imagine the investigation by the government.
Come on Mitch do the RIGHT thing here and SIMPLY COMPUTE the credit and put it in the employer accounts.