Unemployment tax repayment causes confusion

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana's plan to balance an unemployment insurance fund hit hard during the recession might have caused businesses to pay more than they owed, although no one seems to know how many companies were involved or the level of impact it had on them.

Indiana Department of Workforce Development Auditor Cathy Luff said Tuesday that businesses she examined in 2011 had overpaid because of confusion over when higher unemployment taxes approved by lawmakers in 2009 took effect.

Meanwhile, Luff said she was removed from her auditing duties last Thursday after talking with WISH-TV about her concerns. A spokesman for the Department of Workforce Development said Luff is still employed by the state and has not been formally disciplined in any way, but declined further comment citing personnel confidentiality.

Department Commissioner Scott Sanders said Monday that if companies did incorrectly calculate how much they owed the state, it is up to them to let the department know and seek that money. He called it "a self-reporting process."

"So employers would need to go back and take a look at what they filed and if they filed incorrectly, by all means come back and submit a corrected return," Sanders said. "We'll be happy to issue them a credit memo and a refund if that's what they would like."

Neither Luff nor the department knows how many businesses overpaid the state or by how much. But of the 91 audits Luff performed last year, roughly 15 percent of the businesses made this mistake. She said she cannot reveal the names of businesses she audited because it is confidential information.

The state is obligated to help them get their money back, Luff said.

"I believe what happened is they don't want to give money back," she said Tuesday of the Department of Workforce Development, citing the need to bring the state's unemployment fund back into solvency following the spike in unemployment claims during the recession.

"At a minimum DWD should notify employers to go back and check to see if they reported correctly," she said.

The trouble stems from Indiana's efforts to repay roughly $2 billion in loans from the federal government to cover unemployment costs as the recession hit. Lawmakers developed a two-pronged plan in 2009 to deal with the problem by increasing the tax businesses pay into the insurance fund and increasing the amount of employee wages taxed from the first $7,000 earned by each worker to the first $9,500.

That latter bump, in the amount taxed, is what caused the current problem. The new plan was set to take effect at the start of 2010, but lawmakers delayed the tax hike a few months later, leaving businesses with the lower tax burden through 2010 — whether they knew it or not.

Both Luff and the Department of Workforce Development suspect the problem stems in part from businesses using software like Quickbooks that was updated at the start of 2010 with information that was out-of-date after lawmakers delayed the tax hike in March.

Because the companies file their own calculations, only state auditors such as Luff would have caught the mistake and the department audited only 2.5 percent of employers last year.

Luff first discovered the problem last year when auditing payments for 2010 and reported it to her bosses at the department. She said she decided to go to the media after the department did nothing to reduce her level of concern.

"It strikes me that there really is responsibility on both ends of this equation," said Craig Hartzer, a Department of Workforce Development commissioner under former Gov. Frank O'Bannon.

It was up to businesses to be aware that the changes were coming, but the state was responsible for doing everything possible to let them know, said Hartzer, who now teaches at Indiana University's public affairs school.

Democratic gubernatorial candidate John Gregg called the problem another example of mismanagement by the state, following the discovery of $526 million in tax errors, and asked for an immediate audit of state government. But the unemployment insurance problem appears to have little in common with the other, massive tax mistakes discovered by the state over the last half-year.


  • State's Initiative!
    A 15% error rate is significant enough to suggest that the changes and the late timing of the changes contributed to the problem.

    I would argue that, upon re-examination, many businesses would fail to recognize where they erred originally, and would remain unaware that a corrected return is in order.

    The state's role in causing this material problem suggests that the state should initiate audits aimed at returning money that does not belong to the state, on behlaf of its businesses and citizens.
  • Whistleblower protection?
    I certainly hope the lady that reported her concerns to her superiors, (and nothing was done) who then went to the TV station is protected by whistleblower status. There is a lot more waste and mismanagement in the state that could be fixed if the employees knew they would not suffer retalitation. Wait, this is a "right to work" state, so the employer has the right to fire you, even if it is because you are exposing the dirty laundry of management.
  • Not my man Mitch
    Let's see the Indiana Department of Revenue receives WH-1 filings every month listing all employees wages and at the end of the year receive the WH-3 along with W-2's.

    It was very confusing to employers receiving notice of the wage base increase and likely a notice of rate increase at the time.
    This is another case of the state albeit IDWD reporting REVENUE that was not EARN (theirs).

    Sound familiar like when all the employers make their WH-1 monthly filing and on page 2 (mind you electronically-on the state's own portal) they list the amount by county withheld out of employee's check to be paid to the respective county. You know the amount the state did not want to pay the counties.

    If this scheme was done in the private sector imagine the investigation by the government.
    Come on Mitch do the RIGHT thing here and SIMPLY COMPUTE the credit and put it in the employer accounts.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. why oh why does this state continue to elect these people....do you wonder how much was graft out of the 3.8 billion?

  2. i too think this is a great idea. I think the vision and need is there as well. But also agree with Wendy that there may be better location in our city to fulfill this vision and help grow the sports of hockey and figure skating in Indy. Also to help further develop other parts of the city that seem often forgotten. Any of the other 6 townships out side of the three northernmost could benefit greatly from a facility and a vision like this. For a vision that sounds philanthropic, the location is appears more about the money. Would really like to see it elsewhere, but still wish the development the best of luck, as we can always use more ice in the city. As for the Ice growth when they return, if schedules can be coordinated with the Fuel, what could be better than to have high level hockey available to go see every weekend of the season? Good luck with the development and the return of the Ice.

  3. How many parking spaces do they have at Ironworks? Will residents have reserved spaces or will they have to troll for a space among the people that are there at Ruth Chris & Sangiovese?

  4. You do not get speeding ticket first time you speed and this is not first time Mr.Page has speed. One act should not define a man and this one act won't. He got off with a slap on the wrist. I agree with judge no person was injured by his actions. The state was robbed of money by paying too much rent for a building and that money could have been used for social services. The Page family maybe "generous" with their money but for most part all of it is dirty money that he obtained for sources that are not on the upright. Page is the kind of lawyer that gives lawyers a bad name. He paid off this judge like he has many other tine and walked away. Does he still have his license. I believe so. Hire him to get you confiscated drug money back. He will. It will cost you.

  5. I remain amazed at the level of expertise of the average Internet Television Executive. Obviously they have all the answers and know the business inside and out.