IBJNews

Vendors unsure of benefits from more State Fair days

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Dipping rectangular shapes of frozen ice cream into chocolate, rolling them in peanuts and poking sticks into the tasty treats known as fiddlesticks at the Indiana State Fair can be a monotonous job.

The responsibility falls on Skip Richmond of Daytona Beach, Fla., a retired aircraft mechanic who, with his wife, travels the summer months in a motor home, working for Illinois-based King’s Food Service at carnivals and fairs across the region.

The Indiana State Fair remains Richmond’s favorite event, largely because of the friendly people and its no-alcohol policy. Yet he’s still uncertain about the decision last year to add another five days to the schedule. This year’s State Fair begins Friday and runs until Aug. 22.

“It’s tiring,” he said. “The slow days are well-appreciated during a 17-day run.”

The extended run helped attract a record 973,902 visitors to the annual August event last year, up from 859,619 the previous year. But food vendors such as Richmond maintain the attendance bump failed to translate into noticeably higher sales.

The reason: Additional days caused daily crowds to drop significantly, from an average of 71,634 per day in 2008 to 57,288 last year.

“It just pretty much evened out,” Joanie Monroe said. “It gave people more days to choose when they wanted to come.”

Monroe and her husband, both from Marion, are veterans of the fair circuit, having traveled Indiana the past 25 years, peddling elephant ears and funnel cakes to hungry patrons.

That experience has led Monroe to conclude that fairs mostly are “recession-proof.” Families might skip a vacation but they’re unlikely to miss their local fair, she’s observed.

Indeed, fairs are big business. An independent study conducted by Ball State University found the 2008 State Fair, combining visitor expenditures and operating expenses, produced an economic impact of $61.7 million.

That figure undoubtedly grew last year because of the additional five days, State Fair spokesman Andy Klotz said, although he’s unsure by how much.

State Fair officials hope attendance will break another record this year, but they’ve tempered their estimate at 900,000 to guard against the possibility of soggy weather.

A spate of 90-degree days has warmed Indianapolis this summer and more sizzling temperatures are expected. Forecasters predict highs in the mid-90s next week. But rainy weather remains a bigger threat to attendance than high temperatures, Klotz said.

“They both have an effect, but rain is worse,” Klotz said. “We’d rather have warmer temperatures than all-day rains, no question about it.”

Even so, people won’t eat as much if it’s too hot, said JoDee Barrett at the Dippin’ Dots ice cream stand.

Barrett, of Lincoln, Neb., travels with her franchise annually, starting in Colorado and moving east as the summer progresses, hitting about 10 fairs along the way. This is the fourth year she’s sold her product at the Indiana State Fair.

She prefers the longer, 17-day schedule, if only because it affords her a chance to avoid more travel.

“You sit in one place longer and you aren’t moving from fair to fair,” she said.

Still, she’s not expecting a boon in additional sales.

Instead, several vendors, including Ty Hampe, Indianapolis-based Royal Spa’s director of marketing, agree that one year is not enough time to judge the success of the new schedule. They think they’ll have a better grasp after this fair finishes.

Royal Spa has sold as many as 220 hot tubs during its best year at the fair and averages about 150 sales.

Said Hampe: “This year will give us the answer.”

ADVERTISEMENT

  • The fair for "us"
    Regardless of the crowds & weather, I could sit on the tram all day & into the evening. Every so many laps to switch from inside to outside.

    It drives my wife nuts. But for me, I like studying the people.

    She prefers to hit the areas for cross-stitching, etc. I know enough about that to ask lots of stupid questions and learn from her expertise. (even after 24 years).

    In terms of deep-fried , it's fine to buy one to try it, but unless it's something which turns out something tolerable (you'll win the PowerBall first), it's tempting to just throw it away; instead, we give others a chance to sample it to save them the purchase price.

    I'm still waiting for deep-fried hard-boiled eggs.


    phil

    p.s.

    Has anyone done a study to see how much your cholesterol increases when you walk by the vendors and smell their food? (The closer you get...)

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT