Voucher supporters tout Indiana program's 1st year

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana's school voucher program has finished its first year with enrollment on the rise and supporters trumpeting the program's successes.

Some 4,800 Indiana students have already signed up for vouchers to move this fall from public schools to private schools. That's about 800 more than obtained vouchers this year, and the deadline is still months away.

State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Bennett said the program's first year has been a success because "almost 4,000 kids exercised a choice they didn't previously have."

Indiana lawmakers passed legislation in 2011 giving the state the nation's broadest voucher program. The program's income guidelines are wide and students from all schools — not just failing schools — are eligible.

Despite a compressed time period last year to the establish the program's rules, the voucher program appears to have gone off without any major hitches, The Journal Gazette reported Sunday.

Indiana's average voucher was worth $4,150 this year. A total of $15.5 million in taxpayer dollars was sent to largely religious-affiliated private schools rather than public schools during the program's first year.

That's down slightly from numbers released in the beginning of the year because 327 of the original 3,919 voucher students left their selected private schools during the school year. When voucher students leave, the private schools are required to return the state funding on a prorated basis.

Mary Keefer, principal at Bishop Luers High School, said her school gained 58 voucher students and only four or five left during the school year. She said a few decided it wasn't the right choice for them, and the school asked a few other students to leave.

"We want kids to feel welcome, but we also won't lower our standards, so that's a fine line," she said.

Julie Nieveen, of Warsaw, used a voucher this year for her 13-year-old daughter, Ellie. She said all her other children had gone to public elementary and then Lakeland Christian Academy for middle and high school. She said that for rest of Ellie's K-12 career, the family could see savings of $25,000 under the voucher program.

Indiana's voucher law has been challenged in court by opponents who say it violates the state constitution by funneling tax dollars to religious institutions. But supporters say the program gives families more education options.

Lindsey Brown, executive director of School Choice Indiana, called the program's first year a success in terms of the number of families participating and the compelling stories surrounding the new opportunity.

She said her organization will push lawmakers to open up the program to kindergartners. For now, students must at least try one year in public schools before moving to private schools.

"Our priority is increasing access," Brown said.

Sen. Dennis Kruse, R-Auburn, chairman of the Senate Education Committee, said he expects several lawmakers to file legislation removing the income limits on the program, but he doesn't think there are enough votes to pass it.


  • An Apparent Example of Public Education Gone Wrong
    Rock It -- there are so many misspellings, factual errors and grammatical mistakes in your message that I must ask: Did you attend public schools?

    If so, perhaps you would have benefited from attending a private or faith-based institution where excellence is both expected and coached.
  • What about the public schools?
    Of course private schools have better test scores and parent involvement. Private schools have the choice to reject any student they want (as described in the article). They can also turn people away so they can keep their enrollment numbers lower and provide good student to teacher ratios. Public schools have no choice. They are required to educate any student who walks in the door, whether they have special needs, have discipline issues, or have parents who don't care at all about their children. If we continue to strip public schools of their funding, then we are simply left with holding cells for future criminals.

    I'm all for choice, but not at the sacrifice of public education.
  • interesting to follow progress
    Nice write-up. It will be interesting to follow the progress over the newxt few years. I find it interesting that so many people in the state bash this program without truly understanding it. THIS DOES NOT BENEFIT THE RICH (as posted by someone earlier). It benefits people with well-below average incomes (i think the max is somewhere in the $60k range), and allows them to give their kids an opportunity to have a better education. It is a fact that a private, faith-based school has better test scores, parent/student involvement, etc... So why not give students without the financial reseources the opportunity to attend one of these schools?
  • Stealing tax money to pay for private schools that will only benefit the Rich!
    It is unmistakeable ignorant to assume Indiana Voucher Program will have a overall benefit for anyone except the Private Schools and tha rich who kids mostly attend them. It is simply a method to fund them using the tax payers money. Look at the big picture and stop looking at what the state's Education Supt is attempting to divert your attention to! IPS is about to lay off over 80 teachers due to what this guy has planned an implemented. Wake Up Napetown!

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

  2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

  3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

  4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

  5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............