IBJNews

WellPoint among 13 picked to join California exchange

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

California residents who choose to buy health insurance through the state exchange being created by the Affordable Care Act may end up paying higher premiums.

Indianapolis-based WellPoint Inc., Molina Healthcare Inc. and Health Net Inc. were among 13 insurers selected to participate in the most-populous U.S. state’s health exchange, which begins enrollment Oct. 1. While the rates the companies will charge vary widely depending on a person’s circumstance, the director of the exchange said Thursday that premium increases will be less than the 30-percent jump projected by consulting company Milliman Inc.

“There have been predictions across the board that rates were going to skyrocket,” Peter Lee, the executive director in charge of the Covered California health exchange, said in a conference call. “Rates are going up at far lower than the best estimate Milliman thought might happen and way below the worst estimates of doom and gloom.”

Aetna Inc. has warned of “rate shock” when customers shop for plans in exchanges, citing health-law policies that mandate better benefits and prohibit the companies from refusing to cover the sick or charging older people more than three times as much as young adults. Aetna, along with UnitedHealth Group Inc. and Cigna Corp., three of the four-largest U.S. health insurers, chose not to join the California exchange.

People who currently buy coverage for themselves or their families from Blue Shield of California, a not-for-profit that is one of the largest insurers in the state, will see average rate increases of about 13 percent when they renew their coverage in the exchange, Paul Markovich, the company’s president, said on the call. Federal subsidies can greatly reduce the cost.

About 5.3 million Californians will be eligible to purchase coverage through the new exchange and about half may be eligible for the subsidies, according to the report.

Lee said individuals can expect to pay as much as 29 percent less than what small businesses now pay for coverage, though that estimate doesn’t provide a direct comparison to today’s costs to individuals. Some people, especially low-income residents, should expect to see their costs fall.

“We think the premiums you’re going to see are competitive,” Lee said.

In Los Angeles County, rates will be as low as $117 a month, before federal subsidies, for a 25-year-old buying a high-deductible plan intended to cover only “catastrophic” health costs, according to a report by Covered California.

President Barack Obama’s 2010 health-care system overhaul called for the implementation next year of health-insurance marketplaces in every state to sell coverage to people who don’t get it at work, often with government subsidies to reduce the cost. The health law will also expand some state Medicaid programs, which provide insurance for people living in or near poverty.

Milliman, the Seattle-based consulting company, said in March that Californians who make too much money to qualify for subsidies may pay as much as 30 percent more for insurance as a result of the law.

Lee said Covered California hasn’t yet conducted an apples-to-apples study of how exchange rates for individuals will compare to current rates available to individuals. He used a comparison to rates in the small business market because California law prohibits insurers from refusing coverage to people employed at small firms, just as the federal law will require for individuals starting next year.

For the Blue Shield plans, a 40-year-old in north Los Angeles, earning less than $17,000 a year who buys individual coverage would pay $57 a month after subsidies, according to the report. Without subsidies, the plan would cost $252 a month.

The plan would cover about 70 percent of her medical costs, a level of coverage the law calls “silver.” Bronze-level coverage that pays 60 percent of costs, the minimum allowed under the law, would cost an average of $1 a month for the same 40-year-old, after subsidies.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Premium Increase Hullabaloo
    The fear-mongering over healthcare premium increases is a bunch of hullabaloo and saber rattling by insurance companies trying to retain excessive profits. In the late 90s, my small business dealt with 12+% premium increases every year, starting at a time when S corporations could not deduct premium costs for owners while big corporations were writing off top-of-the-line policies for executives. While the tax ramifications changed by the end of the Clinton administration to be more fair to small businesses, annual premium increases have always been the norm, and profits by the top companies that provide healthcare insurance have always been a the root of the high cost of healthcare. It is more likely that once the ACA is completely in place and the uninsured are absorbed into the system, overall costs will go down and competition will keep premium increases in check. Let's find out.
  • tryagain
    Apparently the insurance companies found a way to raise premiums again. Turns out they were the problem to begin with and there's no plan to fix their wagons.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

  2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

  3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

  4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

  5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the problem...you will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...

ADVERTISEMENT