IBJNews

WellPoint approves annual 'say on pay' measure

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Shareholders of WellPoint Inc. on Tuesday voted to approve hefty pay for the company’s executives and also for the right to weigh in annually on future executive compensation.

The votes came at the Indianapolis-based health insurer’s annual meeting of shareholders, held at the downtown Hilton hotel. Vote tallies were not immediately available after the meeting.

A year ago, WellPoint shareholders approved a measure that demanded an annual “say on pay” vote, which would not be binding but would allow shareholders to express displeasure with excessive pay to top brass.

Since then, the U.S. Congress required all publicly traded companies to allow “say on pay” votes as part of the Dodd-Frank financial reform legislation passed last year.

The law requires a “say on pay” vote every two or three years, but WellPoint’s board recommended an annual vote. And shareholders agreed on Tuesday.

Many other local companies, such as Eli Lilly and Co. and CNO Financial Group Inc., also this year approved annual “say on pay” votes.

The votes don’t require companies to do anything. Only if shareholders register a “significant vote” against the pay of WellPoint’s top five named executives will the company’s board consider "shareholders’ concerns, and the compensation committee will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address those concerns,” the board members wrote in the company’s proxy statement sent to shareholders.

Angela Braly, WellPoint’s chairwoman and CEO, received total compensation last year of $13.4 million, an increase of 3 percent over the previous year, as WellPoint’s operating and stock performance improved even as enrollment continued to decline in the face of high unemployment. Braly's annual salary remained flat at $1.1 million, but her performance-based bonus rose more than 80 percent, to $2.7 million.

At the meeting, shareholder Karen Green-Stone noted that Braly’s pay is equivalent to the salaries of hundreds of schoolteachers. She then asked, “Would you kindly tell us why you are worth so much more than them?”

Braly, standing at a podium next to a digital clock meant to keep shareholder questions to less than two minutes, defended WellPoint’s compensation as in line with other companies, and vetted by the board, consultants and now the shareholders.

“We consider it important to have competitive [pay] arrangements for the CEO and the named executive officers,” she said, adding that Tuesday’s votes indicate that “our shareholders support it.”

In other votes, more than 75 percent of WellPoint shareholders approved the removal of various anti-takeover provisions in the company's articles of incorporation. The company will no longer require 75-percent shareholder approval to amend the the articles of incorporation and will no longer require a two-thirds majority to remove directors or approve an acquisition of the company.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Compensation
    I always love how the executives and corporate boards fall back on consultant recommendations. The compensation consultants serve at the pleasure of the board - they are just a rubber stamp. They wouldn't be around for long if they didn't give the board the answer they wanted.

    I also wonder how many of the stockholders actually voted as opposed to the company voting for them.
  • WellPoint Exec.
    Well, I wish we'd get a 3 percent drop* in our mortgage payments!! They "forgot Sallie Mae, in the Foreclosure plan; which covers VA loans"!!!! Most got a 3 percent drop or more in their payments.Tell me, did Wells Fargo ever payback their 28 Billion they got from Tax payers? Sincerely, Bonny H. Indpls., IN (Avid watcher of IBJ)
  • How can this be?
    I thought Obamacare was going to destroy everything! Poor Wellpoint execs, only got a 3 percent increase.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Why is the street configuration necessary? New York and Michigan get congested enough as 4-lane one-way streets, imagine how bad they'll be when they are only 2-lanes in each direction. Furthermore, there are TONS of flashing lights and yield signs for pedestrians EVERYWHERE on IUPUI's campus, but I swear I'm the only driver who yields to the pedestrians there. Just enforce the existing signs!

    2. Excellent investment! Many times people are too shortsighted to see that investments such as these are just as important as "fixing potholes". And, perhaps I missed it, but could you point out where your / our pockets are being pilfered in this deal, Italiano? I didn't read where any of your (or my) tax dollars are involved.

    3. I see the same whiney liberals complaining about every single thing that Mayor Ballard does to improve the city. There could be an article about him saving a drowning child and your liberals would find a way to complain about.

    4. Oh snap! It's on! Ballard vs. Hogsett. Indy is due for a "real" mayoral race, this will be epic!

    5. This is obviously good for the city and all of its residents. Would you object to any improvements to anything in our city until every pothole is filled? Why? Look, there's a proposal for roads in place, with funding proposed as well, it simply requires the City Council and the Major to agree. It will happen (not soon enough, perhaps, but it will happen). In the meantime, yes, let's do the common sense, demonstrably smart things that will make our city better.

    ADVERTISEMENT