IBJNews

WellPoint approves annual 'say on pay' measure

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Shareholders of WellPoint Inc. on Tuesday voted to approve hefty pay for the company’s executives and also for the right to weigh in annually on future executive compensation.

The votes came at the Indianapolis-based health insurer’s annual meeting of shareholders, held at the downtown Hilton hotel. Vote tallies were not immediately available after the meeting.

A year ago, WellPoint shareholders approved a measure that demanded an annual “say on pay” vote, which would not be binding but would allow shareholders to express displeasure with excessive pay to top brass.

Since then, the U.S. Congress required all publicly traded companies to allow “say on pay” votes as part of the Dodd-Frank financial reform legislation passed last year.

The law requires a “say on pay” vote every two or three years, but WellPoint’s board recommended an annual vote. And shareholders agreed on Tuesday.

Many other local companies, such as Eli Lilly and Co. and CNO Financial Group Inc., also this year approved annual “say on pay” votes.

The votes don’t require companies to do anything. Only if shareholders register a “significant vote” against the pay of WellPoint’s top five named executives will the company’s board consider "shareholders’ concerns, and the compensation committee will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address those concerns,” the board members wrote in the company’s proxy statement sent to shareholders.

Angela Braly, WellPoint’s chairwoman and CEO, received total compensation last year of $13.4 million, an increase of 3 percent over the previous year, as WellPoint’s operating and stock performance improved even as enrollment continued to decline in the face of high unemployment. Braly's annual salary remained flat at $1.1 million, but her performance-based bonus rose more than 80 percent, to $2.7 million.

At the meeting, shareholder Karen Green-Stone noted that Braly’s pay is equivalent to the salaries of hundreds of schoolteachers. She then asked, “Would you kindly tell us why you are worth so much more than them?”

Braly, standing at a podium next to a digital clock meant to keep shareholder questions to less than two minutes, defended WellPoint’s compensation as in line with other companies, and vetted by the board, consultants and now the shareholders.

“We consider it important to have competitive [pay] arrangements for the CEO and the named executive officers,” she said, adding that Tuesday’s votes indicate that “our shareholders support it.”

In other votes, more than 75 percent of WellPoint shareholders approved the removal of various anti-takeover provisions in the company's articles of incorporation. The company will no longer require 75-percent shareholder approval to amend the the articles of incorporation and will no longer require a two-thirds majority to remove directors or approve an acquisition of the company.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Compensation
    I always love how the executives and corporate boards fall back on consultant recommendations. The compensation consultants serve at the pleasure of the board - they are just a rubber stamp. They wouldn't be around for long if they didn't give the board the answer they wanted.

    I also wonder how many of the stockholders actually voted as opposed to the company voting for them.
  • WellPoint Exec.
    Well, I wish we'd get a 3 percent drop* in our mortgage payments!! They "forgot Sallie Mae, in the Foreclosure plan; which covers VA loans"!!!! Most got a 3 percent drop or more in their payments.Tell me, did Wells Fargo ever payback their 28 Billion they got from Tax payers? Sincerely, Bonny H. Indpls., IN (Avid watcher of IBJ)
  • How can this be?
    I thought Obamacare was going to destroy everything! Poor Wellpoint execs, only got a 3 percent increase.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Aaron is my fav!

    2. Let's see... $25M construction cost, they get $7.5M back from federal taxpayers, they're exempt from business property tax and use tax so that's about $2.5M PER YEAR they don't have to pay, permitting fees are cut in half for such projects, IPL will give them $4K under an incentive program, and under IPL's VFIT they'll be selling the power to IPL at 20 cents / kwh, nearly triple what a gas plant gets, about $6M / year for the 150-acre combined farms, and all of which is passed on to IPL customers. No jobs will be created either other than an handful of installers for a few weeks. Now here's the fun part...the panels (from CHINA) only cost about $5M on Alibaba, so where's the rest of the $25M going? Are they marking up the price to drive up the federal rebate? Indy Airport Solar Partners II LLC is owned by local firms Johnson-Melloh Solutions and Telemon Corp. They'll gross $6M / year in triple-rate power revenue, get another $12M next year from taxpayers for this new farm, on top of the $12M they got from taxpayers this year for the first farm, and have only laid out about $10-12M in materials plus installation labor for both farms combined, and $500K / year in annual land lease for both farms (est.). Over 15 years, that's over $70M net profit on a $12M investment, all from our wallets. What a boondoggle. It's time to wise up and give Thorium Energy your serious consideration. See http://energyfromthorium.com to learn more.

    3. Markus, I don't think a $2 Billion dollar surplus qualifies as saying we are out of money. Privatization does work. The government should only do what private industry can't or won't. What is proven is that any time the government tries to do something it costs more, comes in late and usually is lower quality.

    4. Some of the licenses that were added during Daniels' administration, such as requiring waiter/waitresses to be licensed to serve alcohol, are simply a way to generate revenue. At $35/server every 3 years, the state is generating millions of dollars on the backs of people who really need/want to work.

    5. I always giggle when I read comments from people complaining that a market is "too saturated" with one thing or another. What does that even mean? If someone is able to open and sustain a new business, whether you think there is room enough for them or not, more power to them. Personally, I love visiting as many of the new local breweries as possible. You do realize that most of these establishments include a dining component and therefore are pretty similar to restaurants, right? When was the last time I heard someone say "You know, I think we have too many locally owned restaurants"? Um, never...

    ADVERTISEMENT