WellPoint buying 1-800 Contacts for about $900M

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis-based WellPoint Inc. has agreed to buy eyewear and contact-lens retailer 1-800 Contacts Inc. for about $900 million, The Wall Street Journal reported.

The deal is the latest example of health insurers seeking to diversify into higher-margin businesses while strengthening their ties to consumers.

"We see a unique way of tying 1-800 Contacts into our product design," Wayne DeVeydt, WellPoint's chief financial officer, told the Journal.

WellPoint officials told the newspaper that they might develop health plans and vision coverage that offer special discounted access to contacts and eyewear.

The companies would not confirm the purchase price, but a source told the newspaper it was close to $900 million.

Draper, Utah-based 1-800 Contacts is the largest direct-to-consumer retailer in the contact lens market.  The firm, which is majority owned by New York-based Fenway Partners, sells contacts and eyewear by phone, Internet, mail and fax. CEO Jonathan Coon said its annual revenue is about $400 million.

DeVeydt told Journal that 1-800 Contacts has after-tax margins in the “double-digit range” compared with about 5 percent for WellPoint’s health insurance lines.

Insurers have been seeking diversification opportunities in part because the federal health care law is expected to pinch profits on traditional coverage. Last year, WellPoint rival UnitedHealth Group rolled out plans to sell hearing aids directly to consumers over the Internet.

The health overhaul law is accelerating a shift toward people selecting their own health-care products and health coverage. DeVeydt told Journal that trend “is not slowing down,” regardless of the outcome of the Supreme Court’s review of the law.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Looking at the two companies - in spite of their relative size to one another -- Ricker's image is (by all accounts) pretty solid and reputable. Their locations are clean, employees are friendly and the products they offer are reasonably priced. By contrast, BP locations are all over the place and their reputation is poor, especially when you consider this is the same "company" whose disastrous oil spill and their response was nothing short of irresponsible should tell you a lot. The fact you also have people who are experienced in franchising saying their system/strategy is flawed is a good indication that another "spill" has occurred and it's the AM-PM/Ricker's customers/company that are having to deal with it.

  2. Daniel Lilly - Glad to hear about your points and miles. Enjoy Wisconsin and Illinois. You don't care one whit about financial discipline, which is why you will blast the "GOP". Classic liberalism.

  3. Isn't the real reason the terrain? The planners under-estimated the undulating terrain, sink holes, karst features, etc. This portion of the route was flawed from the beginning.

  4. You thought no Indy was bad, how's no fans working out for you? THe IRl No direct competition and still no fans. Hey George Family, spend another billion dollars, that will fix it.

  5. I live downtown Indy and had to be in downtown Chicago for a meeting. In other words, I am the target demographic for this train. It leaves at 6:00-- early but doable. Then I saw it takes 5+ hours. No way. I drove. I'm sure I paid 3 to 5 times as much once you factor in gas, parking, and tolls, but it was reimbursed so not a factor for me. Any business traveler is going to take the option that gets there quickly and reliably... and leisure travelers are going to take the option that has a good schedule and promotional prices (i.e., Megabus). Indy to Chicago is the right distance (too short to fly but takes several hours to drive) that this train could be extremely successful even without subsidies, if they could figure out how to have several frequencies (at least 3x/day) and make the trip in a reasonable amount of time. For those who have never lived on the east coast-- Amtrak is the #1 choice for NY-DC and NY-Boston. They have the Acela service, it runs almost every hour, and it takes you from downtown to downtown. It beats driving and flying hands down. It is too bad that we cannot build something like this in the midwest, at least to connect the bigger cities.