IBJNews

WellPoint buying private health insurance exchange

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis-based WellPoint Inc., the largest insurer by enrollment, is buying a private health-insurance exchange to compete for employers with the U.S. state-run marketplaces set to open in 2014 under President Obama’s health-care overhaul.

WellPoint and two not-for-profit health insurers said Tuesday that they are buying a 78-percent stake in Bloom Health, a closely held benefits company in Minneapolis, for an undisclosed sum. Bloom is a two-year-old online marketplace that offers a menu of health plans to about 20,000 workers at almost 50 companies.

Using a private exchange such as Bloom would limit an employer’s costs and provide consistency compared with separate state-run exchanges, each with their own regulations, said Ken Goulet, CEO of Indianapolis-based WellPoint’s commercial business unit.

“We see this as a way of preserving the employer-based market by providing some predictability in health-care costs,” Goulet said.

The state-run marketplaces where people will select health insurance plans are central to the Obama administration’s goal of expanding coverage to as much as 95 percent of Americans. The Congressional Budget Office expects 24 million people to obtain insurance through exchanges by 2014.

A study by New York-based consulting firm McKinsey & Co. said that as many as one-third of U.S. companies are considering giving up employer-sponsored health plans. Instead, they would send their workers to state-run exchanges for coverage, paying a federally mandated fine.

Employers have battled rising health-care costs, which in recent years have grown twice as fast as the consumer price index. Under the Bloom model, companies pay employees a fixed amount to cover a portion of their health-care coverage and workers provide the rest based on the plans they select.

Goulet said the Bloom exchange allows employers to maintain their tax deduction on the money paid annually into an employee’s health reimbursement account to help cover the cost of insurance. He said it also allows workers to pick a plan that suits their health-care needs and how much they are willing to spend.

The idea of the private health-care exchange and its defined contribution model is similar to the trend in retirement benefits in which employers have been abandoning defined benefit pension plans for the relative financial safety of a 401(k) that allows companies to control how much they spend.

WellPoint’s partners in the Bloom purchase are Chicago-based Health Care Services Corp., the largest U.S. customer-owned insurer, and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, based in Detroit, which already held a minority interest in the private exchange. They bought the stake from Sandbox Industries Inc., a Chicago-based venture capital fund, and a joint venture of Blue Cross Blue Shield plans that invests in start-up health-care companies.

Health Care Services currently operates in Texas, Illinois, New Mexico and Oklahoma. It now will be able to offer employers choices of health plans in the 19 states where Bloom operates, said Martin Foster, president of plan operations at HCSC. The markets covered by Bloom represent about 60 percent of the U.S. population, Goulet said.

“Our objective is to be in all 50 states in the next year,” Goulet said.

Bloom’s customers generally are companies with about 100 to 1,000 employees, said Abir Sen, CEO of Bloom. Unlike competitors that primarily cover the retiree populations of larger employers, Bloom covers workers still on the job, Sen said.

Extend Health Inc. of San Mateo, Calif., is the largest private exchange, covering 300,000 participants. Its customers include Union Pacific Corp. in Nebraska, and U.S. automakers Ford Motor Co., General Motors Co. and Chrysler Group LLC.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT