WellPoint protestors harass Braly as political disclosure proposal fails

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

WellPoint Inc.’s shareholders overwhelmingly rejected a proposal to require greater disclosure of the health insurer’s political giving during a wild annual meeting Wednesday at the Hilton Hotel in downtown Indianapolis.

The proposal, which sought twice-yearly reports on all WellPoint donations used for political campaigns or lobbying, was opposed by 84 percent of WellPoint shares voted at the meeting. Nearly 30 percent of all WellPoint shares were not voted either way on the measure.

But even before the voting was opened, a string of shareholders, most of them representing union groups, shouted questions and criticisms at WellPoint CEO Angela Braly and Corporate Secretary John Cannon.

One man was removed by security guards after repeatedly ignoring Braly’s flat-voiced call to “Keep quiet.” As security led the man out, many other shareholders shouted, “Let him speak!”

The main complaint of the day was that WellPoint has used its corporate funds secretly to finance public policy positions some shareholders don’t like, such as the 2011 rollback of collective bargaining rights for public employees in Indiana, Ohio and Wisconsin, as well as advertisements opposing the health care reform law as it was being debated in 2009.

Many questioners at the meeting hammered WellPoint for making a contribution in 2011 to the American Legislative Exchange Council, a conservative group that has been targeted with full-throated criticism this year by union groups and groups that dislike the council’s stance on “stand your ground” laws that became an issue in the shooting of Florida teenager Trayvon Martin.

“What’s troubling is that after the passage of the Affordable Care Act [in 2010], WellPoint contributed to fund ALEC,” shouted Renaye Manley during a lengthy speech she delivered as Cannon tried to read the voting results from the meeting.

“Ma’am, you are out of order,” Cannon said.

“No, you are out of order,” shot back Manley, a resident of Hobart in northwest Indiana who said she attended the meeting as the representative of institutional investors in WellPoint.

Manley eventually ran out of things to say and sat down.

Others, however, berated Braly about an $86.2 million donation made in August 2009 by a health insurance trade group to fund advertising, polling and grass-roots events opposing the health care reform bill then pending in Congress. WellPoint is a member of the Washington, D.C.-based trade group, America’s Health Insurance Plans.

Many shareholders at the meeting accused WellPoint of giving the entire amount of money. Braly said those were “not fair characterizations,” but she declined to say how much, if anything, WellPoint actually did give.

“Well, then there needs to be additional disclosure,” shouted Paul Filson, director of the Connecticut state council of the Service Employees International Union.

Filson asked whether WellPoint is funding a new round of ads by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which is critical of the Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act, also called ObamaCare.

Filson brought a copy of a letter sent Tuesday to Braly by Kevin Lembo, the comptroller of the state of Connecticut, who demands that WellPoint give him an accounting for the past five years of all its political contributions, spending on lobbying nationally and in every state, and its politically related communications spending.

“As the state’s chief fiscal guardian, I was deeply concerned by recent reports that a significant and growing portion of your company’s revenues are utilized to fund political expenditures which may be in direct conflict with the interests of the state and your policyholders,” Lembo wrote.

Connecticut is one of 14 states, including Indiana, in which WellPoint operates a Blue Cross and Blue Shield health insurance plan.

Braly reiterated that WellPoint complies with all federal and state disclosure laws about its political spending and issues an extensive annual report detailing those expenses. In 2011, the report says, WellPoint spent more than $604,000 on political campaigns, lobbying and other related expenses. The company has annual revenue of nearly $61 billion.

The shareholder proposal for increased disclosure about political giving, brought by California-based Harrington Investments Inc., was not supported by corporate governance watchdogs ISS or Glass Lewis.

After she read out the voting results on the shareholder proposal, Braly said, “Our shareholders have voiced their opinion.”

Outside the meeting, about 50 protestors held signs and balloons denouncing WellPoint. The protesters later moved to Monument Circle, where they marched around chanting slogans and later gave speeches on the steps of the Soldiers & Sailors Monument.

Some activist investors had promised to vote against the four WellPoint directors who were up for re-election this year, but all four received a majority of the shares voted, according to Cannon. He did not provide specific vote results.


  • Not Ignorant
    DR, you're being too hard on yourself. I wouldn't call your comments ignorant, just shallow, oversimplifications. Why not offer a solution? I suggested the shareholders respect the voting process and standard meeting decorum. Another poster suggested if they do not find satisifaction through due process, they vote with their investment dollars. You offer no solution, just holier than thou attitude. On second thought, maybe I was wrong, and you aren't being too hard on yourself.
  • ignorant comments
    I understand shareholders being so irate at the meeting. The answer is not to go away or invest somewhere else or resort to"thuggery", whatever that is, its to hold executives accountable and responsible for their actions. Corporate america's intentions is to always do what they can get away with. What happened to doing what your suppose to do or what is right? Oh I know, GREED.
    • Agree 100%
      Unions have lost all credibility and have been reduced to being whiners and complainers.
      To the unions, don't go away mad, just go away!!
      • Free Markets
        So, if you are unhappy with the Company in which you have invested, feel free to invest it elsewhere...
      • Share voting
        Between the number of people who just sign their proxies with "vote according to the boards recommendations" option and the large number of corporate shares being voted, it's very difficult to get a positive vote on an anti-board initiative. The odds are stacked against any shareholder initiative so a protest is very much in order. It's not just being a poor loser when the odds of winning are minimal.
      • Typical Union Thuggery
        Can't get their way through the orderly process of voting shares, so they distrupt the proceedings with childish tantrums. No wonder no one takes them seriously anymore.

        Post a comment to this story

        We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
        You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
        Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
        No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
        We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

        Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

        Sponsored by

        facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

        Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
        Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
        Subscribe to IBJ
        1. I am a Lyft driver who is a licensed CDL professional driver. ALL Lyft drivers take pride in providing quality service to the Indianapolis and surrounding areas, and we take the safety of our passengers and the public seriously.(passengers are required to put seat belts on when they get in our cars) We do go through background checks, driving records are checked as are the personal cars we drive, (these are OUR private cars we use) Unlike taxi cabs and their drivers Lyft (and yes Uber) provide passengers with a clean car inside and out, a friendly and courteous driver, and who is dressed appropriately and is groomed appropriately. I go so far as to offer mints, candy and/or small bottle of water to the my customers. It's a mutual respect between driver and passenger. With Best Regards

        2. to be the big fish in the little pond of IRL midwest racin' when yer up against Racin' Gardner

        3. In the first sentance "As a resident of one of these new Carmel Apartments the issue the local governments need to discuss are build quality & price." need a way to edit

        4. As a resident of one of these new Carmel Apartments the issue the local governments need to discuss is build quality & price. First none of these places is worth $1100 for a one bedroom. Downtown Carmel or Keystone at the Crossing in Indy. It doesn't matter. All require you to get in your car to get just about anywhere you need to go. I'm in one of the Carmel apartments now where after just 2.5 short years one of the kitchen cabinet doors is crooked and lawn and property maintenance seems to be lacking my old Indianapolis apartment which cost $300 less. This is one of the new star apartments. As they keep building throughout the area "deals" will start popping up creating shoppers. If your property is falling apart after year 3 what will it look like after year 5 or 10??? Why would one stay here if they could move to a new Broad Ripple in 2 to 3 years or another part of the Far Northside?? The complexes aren't going to let the "poor" move in without local permission so that's not that problem, but it the occupancy rate drops suddenly because the "Young" people moved back to Indy then look out.

        5. Why are you so concerned about Ace hardware? I don't understand why anyone goes there! Every time ive gone in the past, they don't have what I need and I end up going to the big box stores. I understand the service aspect and that they try to be helpful but if they are going to survive I think they might need to carry more specialty parts.