IBJNews

WellPoint seeks to diversify by buying contacts retailer

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

WellPoint Inc. plans to buy contact lens retailer 1-800-Contacts Inc. in a deal that would give the insurer its first direct-to-consumer business outside selling individual health coverage.

WellPoint will pay private-equity firm Fenway Partners about $900 million for 1-800 Contacts, said a person familiar with the agreement who asked not to be identified because the information hasn’t been disclosed. The insurer trimmed its 2012 profit forecast by 4 cents as a result of the deal, to $7.80 a share, Indianapolis-based WellPoint said in a statement Monday.

WellPoint said Monday that the eyewear company will help diversify its revenue sources with a high-margin business. The insurer typically generates an after-tax profit margin of around 4 percent. 1-800 Contacts can generate margins in the double-digit range, said Ken Goulet, WellPoint's president of commercial and specialty companies.

In addition, he said the business has shown robust growth, although he declined to offer specifics.

Investors didn't immediately embrace the deal. WellPoint's stock dropped 87 cents, or 1.3 percent, to $65.49 a share, in late-morning trading.

1-800 Contacts fills orders for several brands of contact lens by phone, internet, mail or fax. It also sells eye glasses through its glasses.com website and operates a partnership with Wal-Mart Stores Inc., the world's largest retailer.

"The demand for both contacts and glasses has been a growing business and will accelerate as baby boomers continue to age," Goulet said.

1-800 Contacts currently has about 3.3 million customers. WellPoint Chairwoman and CEO Angela Braly said in a statement that the business comes with a significant growth opportunity because there are more than 38 million people wearing eye contact lenses and more than 140 million people wearing eye glasses in the United States.

WellPoint is the second-largest U.S. health insurer based on both revenue and enrollment, trailing only UnitedHealth Group Inc. It runs Blue Cross Blue Shield plans in 14 states, including California and New York, and health insurance is WellPoint's main product.

The company said in April its total medical membership fell nearly 2 percent to 33.7 million people compared to the end of last year. The company lost enrollment in its two largest membership segments, plans that provide health insurance to employees of small businesses and large, national accounts.

WellPoint, like other health insurers, could see significant enrollment gains after the health care overhaul expands in a couple years to cover millions of uninsured people. But it also will face fees and costs tied to the 2010 law, which is currently being reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Goulet said WellPoint wants to diversify its revenue sources "to make the company healthier and more balanced," and part of that involves adding businesses that fit into its portfolio but are separate from its core insurance products.

Plus, he said 1-800 Contacts receives high customer satisfaction and refill rates, and that can help WellPoint's push to become more consumer friendly.

Many health care companies are increasing their focus on consumers because their customers or patients are being exposed more to the rising costs of care and coverage, and they're becoming more knowledgeable about other options available to them.

WellPoint expects the deal to close in the third quarter and will finance it with cash on hand. The insurer expects its 2012 earnings to take a hit of 4 cents per share due to transaction and integration costs.

WellPoint shares are up 16 percent from their 52-week low of $56.61 in August. They peaked for the past year at $80.90 last July.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Socialized medicine works great for white people in Scandanavia. It works well in Costa Rica for a population that is partly white and partly mestizo. I don't really see Obamacare as something aimed against whites. I think that is a Republican canard designed to elicit support from white people for republican candidates who don't care about them any more than democrats care about the non-whites they pander to with their phony maneuvers. But what is different between Costa Rica nd the Scandanavian nations on one hand and the US on the other? SIZE. Maybe the US is just too damn big. Maybe it just needs to be divided into smaller self governing pieces like when the old Holy Roman Empire was dismantled. Maybe we are always trying the same set of solutions for different kinds of people as if we were all the same. Oh-- I know-- that is liberal dogma, that we are all the same. Which is the most idiotic American notion going right back to the propaganda of 1776. All men are different and their differences are myriad and that which is different is not equal. The state which pretends men are all the same is going to force men to be the same. That is what America does here, that is what we do in our stupid overseas wars, that is how we destroy true diversity and true difference, and we are all as different groups of folks, feeling the pains of how capitalism is grinding us down into equally insignificant proletarian microconsumers with no other identity whether we like it or not. And the Marxists had this much right about the War of Independence: it was fundamentally a war of capitalist against feudal systems. America has been about big money since day one and whatever gets in the way is crushed. Health care is just another market and Obamacare, to the extent that it Rationalizes and makes more uniform a market which should actually be really different in nature and delivery from place to place-- well that will serve the interests of the biggest capitalist stakeholders in health care which is not Walmart for Gosh Sakes it is the INSURANCE INDUSTRY. CUI BONO Obamacare? The insurance industry. So republicans drop the delusion pro capitalist scales from your eyes this has almost nothing to do with race or "socialism" it has to do mostly with what the INSURANCE INDUSTRY wants to have happen in order to make their lives and profits easier.

  2. Read the article - the reason they can't justify staying is they have too many medicare/medicaid patients and the re-imbursements for transporting these patient is so low.

  3. I would not vote for Bayh if he did run. I also wouldn't vote for Pence. My guess is that Bayh does not have the stomach to oppose persons on the far left or far right. Also, outside of capitalizing on his time as U. S. Senator (and his wife's time as a board member to several companies) I don't know if he is willing to fight for anything. If people who claim to be in the middle walk away from fights with the right and left wing, what are we left with? Extremes. It's probably best for Bayh if he does not have the stomach for the fight but the result is no middle ground.

  4. JK - I meant that the results don't ring true. I also questioned the 10-year-old study because so much in the "health care system" has changed since the study was made. Moreover, it was hard to get to any overall conclusion or observation with the article. But....don't be defensive given my comments; I still think you do the best job of any journalist in the area shedding light and insight on important health care issues.

  5. Probably a good idea he doesn't run. I for one do not want someone who lives in VIRGINIA to be the governor. He gave it some thought, but he likes Virginia too much. What a name I cannot say on this site! The way these people think and operate amuses me.

ADVERTISEMENT