IBJNews

WellPoint fires exec after Medicare woes

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

WellPoint Inc. finally canned the head of its consumer business after a string of disappointing results, and so far the move hasn’t further spooked the company’s jittery investors. Although that’s not saying much.

The Indianapolis-based health insurer dismissed Brian Sassi, according to a Feb. 8 securities filing. The unit Sassi ran includes WellPoint's Medicare Advantage plans, some of which have caused problems for WellPoint for months.

Last year, WellPoint lost $150 million due to a Medicare Advantage plan that attracted more customers with a higher risk profile than the insurer expected because a competitor left the market. Those customers generated more in claims than they provided in premiums.

That problem popped up in July and, at the time, WellPoint executives said their June acquisition of CareMore Health Group and its highly regarded managers would help. CareMore specializes in caring for and insuring Medicare patients.

But it’s not clear the expertise of CareMore’s managers has been sought out and applied by WellPoint’s top executives.

WellPoint executives tried to assure analysts last month that the Medicare problems won’t be a problem in 2012. The company reaffirmed its profit forecast of $7.60 per share.

Many investors were not convinced, however, and the company’s stock price has fallen 8 percent since its earnings report.

“WellPoint couldn’t have known the Medicare business would perform so badly in the fourth quarter when they submitted 2012 Medicare bids back in June,” Citi analyst Carl McDonald wrote in a research report. He added, “WellPoint didn’t do a real effective job of explaining why it wouldn’t be a problem in 2012.”

Sassi’s departure didn’t send WellPoint’s stock up or down. He is staying on until March to help with a transition. No successor has been named.

After speaking to company executives, Susquehanna Financial Group analyst Chris Rigg wrote in a research note that Sassi's termination appears to be caused by "multiple years of underperformance in the division."

"While management turnover has been an issue for the company in recent years, we do not believe the announcement signals 2012 EPS guidance is at risk," Rigg wrote.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT