IBJOpinion

SKARBECK: What we need is a tax on stock transactions

Ken Skarbeck
December 26, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The word “tax” tends to immediately raise the blood pressure of most Americans. And while the purpose of most taxes is to raise revenue for the assessing government body, taxes can also be targeted toward changing individual and corporate behavior. It is the latter outcome that is behind a renewed discussion over what is known as the “Tobin tax.”

This conceptual tax was proposed by John Maynard Keynes during the Great Depression, and was later revived by economist James Tobin in the 1970s. It suggested taxing foreign-currency transactions as a way to dissuade short-term speculation in foreign currencies. Keynes viewed the tax as a method to curb a financial world he believed had become a giant casino and which had lost sight of its role in society.

Today, governments across the globe are digging out from the aftermath of a financial system damaged by risky investment behavior. With taxpayers furious over treasuries saddled with bailout debt, world leaders are grappling with ways to repay the debt and prevent speculative behavior from destabilizing markets in the future. Under consideration and gaining clout worldwide is the concept of such a tax on stock, bond, currency and derivatives transactions.

In the United States, a bill was introduced in the House of Representatives earlier this month with the headline-grabbing title of, “Let Wall Street Pay for the Restoration of Main Street Act.” The bill calls for a 0.25-percent tax on transactions and estimates $150 billion per year could be raised, with half going to reduce the deficit and half into a “job-creation reserve.”

In September, a group of 28 business, investment and academic leaders, sponsored by the Washington, D.C.-based Aspen Institute, drafted a document titled, “Overcoming Short-termism.” They advocate that the most effective mechanism to encourage a long-term focus by investors is to create market incentives to encourage patient capital. A key recommendation was to “revise capital-gain tax provisions or implement an excise tax in ways that are designed to discourage excessive share trading and encourage longer-term share ownership.”

Supporters of the Tobin tax frame the argument as akin to a gambling tax, whereby speculative short-term trading activities, which create risk to the financial system and provide few benefits to the economy, will be taxed out of existence. Opponents believe a transaction tax will harm markets by reducing liquidity, restricting economic growth and lowering investment returns. Those arguments are blunted to a degree by the fact that the United States had a transfer tax on stock sales from 1914 to 1966 of 0.2 percent, and the markets and economy did just fine.

As currently envisioned, the tax would exempt tax-favored accounts and the first $100,000 in transactions annually. Investment strategies that would be hurt by the tax are the high-frequency trading systems that have generated billions in profits for Wall Street firms, and investors who maniacally trade in and out of securities. The tax may actually protect them from self-destructive behavior.

Implementation of a transaction tax would serve to discourage the short-term thinking and trading that dominates on Wall Street today. It would push investors and corporations to redirect their activities toward longer-term goals of creating value.•

__________

Skarbeck is managing partner of Indianapolis-based Aldebaran Capital LLC, a money-management firm. Views expressed are his own. He can be reached at 818-7827 or ken@aldebarancapital.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

  2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

  3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

  4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

  5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the problem...you will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...

ADVERTISEMENT