IBJNews

Zimmer highly exposed to health-reform risk

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Shares of Zimmer Holdings Inc. have generated impressive returns of 23 percent in the past year and some 2013 product launches could juice those results even further. But the Warsaw-based maker of orthopedic implants is also the most-exposed company in its industry to two key elements of health care reform: the medical device tax and bundled payments.

Zimmer, which is scheduled to report its fourth-quarter earnings Thursday, derives about 50 percent of its $4.5 billion in annual sales from the United States—a much higher proportion than any of its competitors.

Starting in the second half of this year, a new 2.3-percent tax on medical devices—created by the Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act—will start taking about a $50 million-per-year bite out of Zimmer’s revenue, according to estimates by multiple analysts.

“In our view, ZMH has lagged its competition in diversifying its business model, especially in expanding its emerging market exposure,” Stifel Nicolaus analyst Rick Wise wrote in a Nov. 19 report on Zimmer, noting that the company derives as much as 85 percent of its sales from the developed markets of the United States, Europe, Japan and Australia.

Also, Zimmer’s heavy reliance on U.S. sales means it has the most to lose from bundled-payment initiatives, which are being eagerly embraced by hospitals, according to an in-depth report on the topic issued by J.P. Morgan analysts in October.

That report, based on a survey of 46 U.S. hospital administrators, found that three-quarters of them plan to launch a bundled-payment initiative this year. And 52 percent of them already have submitted plans to Medicare to target orthopedics—a higher percentage than any category except general surgery, which 54 percent of hospitals plan to target.

Interventional cardiology (35 percent) and cardiac surgery (28 percent) were among the other big categories targeted for bundled-payment initiatives, according to J.P. Morgan’s survey.

Bundled payments will be launched this year by the federal Medicare program. Medicare will offer to pay hospitals one fee for a hospital stay or a hospital stay and recovery care. The payment would include fees for both hospital and doctors' services, discounted from the current Medicare fee schedules.

Any savings the hospitals and doctors could achieve below that discount would be theirs to keep, and divvy up according to their internal contracts.

The survey suggests that hip and knee replacement surgeries—Zimmer’s bread and butter—are at the top of the list for hospitals trying to save money under bundled-payment arrangements. They will be seeking to wring better pricing deals from orthopedic implant makers by choosing to source all their implants from as few manufacturers as possible. Also, they will be working to help patients avoid the need for joint replacements in the first place.

“Those most impacted are likely to be device and implant manufacturers as hospitals try to achieve both lower pricing on implants and lower utilization of supplies and devices,” wrote J.P. Morgan analyst Michael Weinstein.

Weinstein estimates that Zimmer derives 35 percent of its total sales from U.S. hip and knee implants—nearly twice as large a percentage as its nearest competitor, Michigan-based Stryker Corp.

“Under a Bundled Payments world, it is this mix piece [i.e., product volumes] that we see coming under more direct pressure,” Weinstein added. “In our large cap coverage, this would render Zimmer most exposed.”

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT