IBJNews

2011 CFO OF THE YEAR: Nancy Carlson

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Honoree, Not-for-Profit

“I’m just a band mom who spends some of her time doing accounting,” jokes Nancy Carlson, vice president and CFO of Music for All Inc.

Carlson (IBJ Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

But Carlson is far underestimating the impact she has had on Music for All, an arts advocacy and education organization that presents Bands of America marching band competitions, as well as other music contests, festivals and camps for teens. It also provides training for music teachers. The organization last year had revenue of $6 million and drew 300,000 attendees and more than 85,000 participants to its events.

The organization was in far less robust shape when Carlson arrived on the scene in January 2008.

Carlson bio“Music for All was, from a financial perspective, on extremely shaky ground,” she said. The group had negative cash flow and had been posting significant losses for several years. The most recent audit had a “going concern” clause, meaning that the organization’s survival was in doubt.

As the mother of music students at Carmel High School, Carlson had become quite familiar with Music for All’s programs, and she liked what she saw. But she knew the organization would have to learn to manage its money and develop alternate revenue sources.

The auditors arrived two weeks after Carlson started the job. “It did not go well,” she said. Soon Carlson got to work establishing procedures and controls. The next year, Music for All passed its audit with flying colors.

“We went from an F to an A in one calendar year,” said Carlson, who is a member of the Indiana CPA Society.

On the expense front, “we took very difficult steps that I don’t want to ever do in my career again,” she said, the worst of which was to cut staffing by 20 percent. That step meant eliminating “very good people.” She froze salaries (a move still in effect) and temporarily stopped matching employee retirement contributions. She renegotiated equipment and service agreements. Those and other reductions cut overall operating expenses by more than 10 percent.

Carlson also helped develop a sensible cost structure for the organization. She led the creation of realistic budgets and conducted long-overdue cash-flow analysis and management. She maintained a successful relationship with the organization’s bank, in spite of a negative fund balance and disappointing operating results.

Her contributions to Music for All are “the very essence of its recovery from serious fiscal problems to a clear path and plan for stabilization,” wrote Eric Martin, the organization’s new CEO, who nominated her for CFO of the Year. She rescued the organization from “uncontrolled mission and personality-based management,” he added.

Staff turnover is down sharply in spite of the salary freeze, largely because Carlson has helped create a climate in which employees feel valued, he said.

Carlson arrived at Music for All after “most of a career” in insurance, most recently as a finance director at Indianapolis-based WellPoint Inc. But she enjoyed volunteering as a band parent so much that she decided it was time to marry her vocation and her avocation. She admits the move meant a bit of a pay cut.

“But the rewards of working for the kids more than makes up for the lost salary,” she said.•

_____

Click here to return to the CFO of the Year landing page.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT