IBJNews

2011 WOMAN OF INFLUENCE: Angela D. Adams

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Associate Attorney, Lewis & Kappes

Sphere of influence: As one of the city’s top immigration attorneys, she is at the center of the debate on reform. She tries to calm the emotionally charged debate with reason and facts. She also has been a leader of several organizations that assist immigrants, especially Hispanics.

When people meet Angela Adams and discover that she is an immigration attorney, the reaction is not always positive. But Adams can handle it.

“It’s an opportunity to build a bridge,” said Adams, an associate in the local law firm of Lewis & Kappes. “I try to educate people, everyone, about immigration. Immigration has become a dirty word.”
 

adams-angela02-15col.jpg (IBJ Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

She tries to counteract negative impressions by sharing information about the positive impact that immigration has on our community and our economy, “as opposed to playing the fear card,” she said. She focuses on facts and tries to keep emotion out of such conversations.

The media have fanned the flames of the two extremes in the debate, but paid less attention to the vast gray area in the middle, she said.

The daughter of two teachers, Adams said, “my two loves are education and immigration. That is my passion.”

Adams, 36, was a driving force behind the Indiana Compact, a statement of five principles to guide a “reasonable, rational” discussion of immigration. Nearly 4,000 people, including many leaders in business, education and politics, have signed the document.

She also was one of the attorneys who challenged two provisions of the state’s new illegal immigration enforcement law in federal court. The judge in the case last summer ruled that the provisions were constitutionally suspect and temporarily barred their enforcement.

Adams considers the Indiana compact and the suit challenging the new law to be the highlights of her career. The lawsuit underscores the need for immigration reform at the federal level, she said.

Adams was named an Indiana Super Lawyer (the top 5 percent of lawyers, as nominated by their peers) in 2009 and 2010 and frequently speaks publicly about immigration issues.

She also has worked to improve access to higher education for immigrants. Ten years ago she founded Mapping Education Toward Achievement, which brings more than 300 Latino children to IUPUI every year to learn about postsecondary options.

“I’m very passionate about improving access for all kids to go to college,” she said.

Adams is president of the board of the Immigration Welcome Center and represents the Mexican Consulate in Indianapolis. She also has served on the board of La Plaza, a Hispanic assistance organization. She volunteers her services at the Neighborhood Christian Legal Clinic.

Adams’ commitment to helping immigrants stems from two sources. The first was her parents, who emphasized standing up for what she believes in and accepting other ways of life. The second was spending time abroad. She lived in Spain during college, and then taught English in Mexico after graduating from Indiana University.

“I really got to learn about the Mexican culture and felt very welcomed. I felt very appreciated and, seeing how hospitable the culture was to me, I wanted to return that favor,” said Adams, who is fluent in Spanish.

Prior to joining Lewis & Kappes nine years ago, Adams was an education consultant for the Indiana Department of Education’s division of Language Minority and Migrant programs. In that position, she trained teachers of English language learners.

A native of Carmel, she has been married for four years to John Adams IV. They have a daughter, Erin, 3, and a son, Johnny, 1. She enjoys bike riding and visiting Brown County.•

_____

Click here to return to the Women of Influence landing page.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT