IBJNews

2011 WOMAN OF INFLUENCE: Christine Altman

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Hamilton County Commissioner

Sphere of influence: This elected official serving the state’s fastest-growing county is a leader in the drive to improve public transportation in central Indiana and promotes regional cooperation among the diverse communities of central Indiana.

Politics was a natural path for Christine Altman.

“I’ve always been fairly competitive. I grew up in a large family, which sort of sets the stage,” said the Fort Wayne native.

Altman, Hamilton County’s third female county commissioner, has worked primarily in male-dominated fields. When she first went into public accounting in the late 1970s, only about 10 percent of accountants at her level were women. When she attended law school, less than a quarter of her fellow students were female.

“I just like challenges,” said Altman, 56.
 

altman-christine-15col.jpg (IBJ Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

Among her current challenges is promoting regional cooperation in areas ranging from transportation to security. Altman serves as president of the Central Indiana Regional Transportation Authority and is a member of the board of the U.S. 31 Coalition.

People don’t realize how much tax money goes toward road construction and maintenance, she said. So she’s working to persuade people that public transportation, which she calls “significantly under-funded,” is a worthwhile investment.

“If you need to get to work or the doctor in another county, there are very few options to get that done, because we’re siloed by county,” she said.

Altman also has been instrumental in allocating funds from a federal Urban Area Security Initiative grant that was awarded to Marion and Hamilton counties after 9/11.

“There’s nothing like money to get you to cooperate,” she said.

Through the grant, the counties have invested nearly $40 million in terrorism and natural-disaster prevention and recovery programs.

Her current work is a long way from where she started, as an auditor. She soon turned to the law because she decided that “public accounting was way too much work.”

After working six straight months without a day off, she gave up her job at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in Houston and returned to Indiana, where she earned her law degree from Indiana University. She has since spent 30 years practicing law, primarily concentrating on business, probate and real estate.

She entered the political realm when she was elected to the Hamilton County Council in 1996.

She is particularly proud of the strength of the capital projects that have been completed under her watch. Among the most important are a new work-release center and juvenile detention programs. Work-release inmates leave prison during the day to work, which allows them to pay for their own incarceration as well as provide for their families through child-support payments, she said.

“It sounds odd to be excited about a jail … but we have one of the better correctional systems in the state,” Altman said.

Her advice to young women: Network, network, network. “That’s what launched my political career. It’s inexpensive and just takes a little time.”

Altman is active in a variety of community organizations. She is a member of the United Way Advisory Board in Hamilton County and has been pro bono legal counsel for the Carmel High School Vocational Building Trades Corp. for 25 years. She is former president of the Hamilton County Leadership Academy and a former director of the Carmel Clay Chamber of Commerce.

She is married to John Dicklin and has two children: Nathan, 24, and Elizabeth, 21, as well as a stepson, Zachary, 26. She enjoys gardening, road trips with her husband, and canoeing and kayaking along the White River in Hamilton County.•

_____

Click here to return to the Women of Influence landing page.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT