IBJNews

2011 WOMAN OF INFLUENCE: Shokrina Radpour Beering

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Managing Partner, Indianapolis office, Plunkett Cooney PC

Sphere of influence: As one of the few women practicing real estate law, she is determined to make life easier for women who follow in her footsteps. She founded IndyCREW, an organization that promotes and supports women in commercial real estate.

When Shokrina Radpour Beering first entered real estate law in 1989, the field was dominated by men. It still is.

“I’m often the only female in the room,” said Beering, managing partner of the Indianapolis office of Plunkett Cooney PC, a law firm based in the Detroit area.

She has faced her share of challenges, and she lacked a good mentor to help guide her through them. So she vowed to provide that support to other women in the field. In 2001, she founded IndyCREW, which offers networking opportunities, education and leadership training for women in commercial real estate. The organization now has 120 members.
 

beering-shokrina01-15col.jpg (IBJ Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

Women continue to make 70 cents for every dollar men earn, even though women often work harder, said Beering, 52.

“I’m blessed to have been successful. It can be done. People just need to be encouraged,” she said.

Beering, a native of Brooklyn, N.Y., cut her teeth in the industry at the former Banc One Corp. She then spent time at two local law firms—Bingham McHale LLP and Cohen & Malad LLP—before joining Plunkett Cooney two years ago.

She has been named an Indiana Super Lawyer (the top 5 percent of lawyers, as nominated by their peers) in five of the last six years. And she is one of only three Hoosiers who have been accepted into the American College of Mortgage Attorneys, which Beering claims as her top professional accomplishment.

Beering also is committed to the Villages of Indiana, which champions the rights of children to a safe and loving home.

“There are so many abused and neglected children in our city who don’t have a voice. There is such a great need,” Beering said.

She first became involved with The Villages in 1998. As chairwoman, she helped steer the organization out of financial difficulties. She also was instrumental in selecting The Villages’ new headquarters, and handled all the legal work for the move pro bono. Under her leadership, the organization expanded its services to non-traditional families and absorbed two other child-serving organizations.

“You make a difference one child at a time,” Beering said. “That’s true in the professional world, for CREW or mentoring an associate at the firm. It’s all relationship-based. You help people, one person at a time, and hopefully they’ll do the same.”

Her charity work extends even to Central America. After a mission trip to Panama several years ago, she and her husband decided they wanted to continue to support the medical care offered to the indigenous people there. So in 2005 they launched Mission Coffee LLC, which imports coffee into the United States, sells it, and funnels the proceeds back to the mission in Panama.

Beering has been married to her husband, Peter, for 23 years and has a daughter, Amanda, 21. She enjoys traveling, reading and baking—“brownies, chocolate cake, anything with chocolate.”•

_____

Click here to return to the Women of Influence landing page.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT