IBJNews

$22M foreclosure suit targets local apartment complexes

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The owner of three apartment complexes in Indianapolis is the target of a $22 million foreclosure suit brought by a lender seeking to have the properties placed in receivership.

New York-based Merrill Lynch Mortgage Lending Inc. is suing several affiliates of Montvale, N.J.-based Empire American Holdings, which owns 328 properties in 17 states.

In the suit filed Monday in Marion Superior Court, Merrill Lynch alleges Empire affiliates defaulted on a loan provided in May 2007 that included financing for the three Indianapolis complexes.

They are the 160-unit Dogwood Glen Apartments near West 79th Street and Township Line Road on the city’s northwest side; the 125-unit Elmtree Park Apartments near East 10th Street and North German Church Road on the far-east side; and the 135-unit Heathmoore Apartments near South Arlington Avenue and East Thompson Road on the southeast side.

Average monthly rents at the three complexes range from $420 to $508.
 
None of the principal has been paid on any of the three loans, according to the suit. The amounts are $6.7 million on the Dogwood loan, $4.2 million on the Elmtree loan and $5.2 million on the Heathmoore loan, Merrill Lynch alleges.

Millions of dollars in interest and penalties push the total amount owed to nearly $22 million, according to the suit.

Merrill Lynch said trustee U.S. Bank sent its first notice of default in December 2010 and followed with a second notice in March 2011.  

The lender is suing the affiliates for breach of contract and is asking a judge to appoint a receiver to manage the three properties as it attempts to take possession of them.

A phone number listed for Empire American Holdings was not in service Wednesday morning.

Merrill Lynch is represented by attorneys at Barnes & Thornburg LLP.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. First, the Athenaeum is going to have to get past the hurdle with the Lockerbie residents and the agreement that the parcel would be residential. Second, and in my opinion, this prime piece of property should include parking, PLUS, a black box theater(s), some market rate and affordable artist housing and a plan to renovate and reconfigure the second story theater. I would negotiate to add the DeHaan property surface parking lot into the development mix, place a one story surface parking garage on the DeHaan lot on the street level (for the Dehaan tenants use during the daytime) and add a second story to the garage that would become an addition to the current second story theater and then change the direction of the theater by moving the stage across the alley and on top of the DeHaan lot parking. You can add all the stage elements that are currently missing from the Athenaeum stage to make it more attractive for use by Ballet, Opera and traveling productions. Plus, the theater changes would probably help solve some of the soundproofing issues. Alas,it does not seem to be a part of the strategic plan to conduct a study to determine best use of the property. Seems like the current plan is a quick and easy move that ignores the property best use/potential and any strategic property planning for the effect on future generations.

  2. I recall that MSA's pilings are still in the ground and hard to remove. It’s not likely any proposal will include significant underground construction/parking because of this. Start adding 2 floors of retail, 8 floors of parking and 5-10 floors of possible hotel, and/or 10-20 floors of residential, and you are at 30 floors already with possible expansion of all the uses. But then again I could be wrong.

  3. Accoriding to their website there is no deadline to the Do Not Call list. What is this article referring to??

  4. On what planet are they entitled to this largesse from the stockholders? These people make multi-million dollar salaries: Pay for your own personal travel.

  5. It matters because they're already paid enormously fat salaries: Pay for your own personal travel. Being "taxed on it" isn't a valid excuse--so what? They're still being gifted a raft of luxury perks from somebody else's money on top of an enormous, lavish salary.

ADVERTISEMENT