Ad spending tops $25 million in Indiana Senate race

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Spending on television ads in the race for Indiana's open Senate seat between Republican Richard Mourdock and Democrat Joe Donnelly topped $25 million this week, nearly five times what was spent in the 2010 Indiana Senate race.

A Democrat tracking ad buys for the Donnelly campaign said Wednesday that Mourdock and his supporters had bought $13.6 million of air time through Election Day and Donnelly supporters had logged $11.5 million. The person spoke on condition of anonymity because the campaign doesn't publicly release tallies.

Indiana's Senate race was already on its way to being the most expensive the state has seen, well more than the close to $6 million spent between Republican U.S. Sen. Dan Coats and then-Democratic U.S. Rep. Brad Ellsworth. But Mourdock's high-profile comment about rape and abortion in last week's debate spurred Democrats and Republicans to buy even more commercial time.

The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee spent $1.1 million replaying Mourdock's comments in an ad that began airing last week. In return, American Crossroads spent $1.5 million this week to push the narrative back against Donnelly, as Republicans attempt to re-inject President Barack Obama into the Senate battle.

"After voting for Barack Obama's agenda, Donnelly wants us to give him a promotion," the narrator says in the new spot.

Mourdock, his campaign staff, and national Republicans swept into the fallout from after the debate have insisted voters are no longer talking about the abortion comment. Donnelly and Democratic groups, meanwhile, have done everything they can to make sure the comment doesn't disappear.

Democratic super PAC American Bridge, for instance, is spending $30,000 to send talking mailers to Indiana residents that replay Mourdock's comment to potential voters. Spokesman Matt Thornton says it's meant to alert voters to Mourdock's "extreme" positions even though Donnelly's position on abortion was the same as Mourdock's until recently and is still quite similar.

Democrats are doing what they can to remind voters of Mourdock's remark, while Republicans try to refocus the race on Donnelly's support for the federal health care law and the auto bailout.

The Mourdock campaign has accused Democrats of being "sleazy" when talking about the comments.

Democratic and Republican internal polls taken since Mourdock made the comment have all shown a race that had been at a stalemate since the May primary beginning to break slightly for Donnelly.

Throughout the race, the Donnelly and Mourdock campaigns have played an almost marginal role on air compared with the roughly $20 million spent by outside groups. Crossroads GPS is by far the biggest spender in Indiana, at close to $5 million, but is not necessarily the most widespread player. That's because broadcast rules allow stations to charge outside groups more for a spot than they charge candidates.

While the air war continues, more groups began spending on mailers, as voters pay more attention to the battle in the final days of the race.


  • who creates life.
    God does. But if a women is raped then this is the devils work. Be a women get raped and become pregnant and see if your view changes. God creates life only when a man and a women consent. God creates love bringing a new life ... when violence is involved its not the same. So mourdock go rape yourself. Besides spending 25 m for the senate is outrageous just think about all the homeless and hungry people.
  • Who creates life?
    Mourdock is correct, if a person gets pregnant,its is Gods miracle. You cannot change that, you can destroy it, but you can not change the fact that God created it. Rape is not of God, but pregnancy is and mamby it's Gods way of making a positive out of a negative. Then again this is my opinion which is also Mourdocks opinion. Not everyone is going to have the same opinion as everyone else, but that is what makes this a free country.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am so impressed that the smoking ban FAILED in Kokomo! I might just move to your Awesome city!

  2. way to much breweries being built in indianapolis. its going to be saturated market, if not already. when is enough, enough??

  3. This house is a reminder of Hamilton County history. Its position near the interstate is significant to remember what Hamilton County was before the SUPERBROKERs, Navients, commercial parks, sprawling vinyl villages, and acres of concrete retail showed up. What's truly Wasteful is not reusing a structure that could still be useful. History isn't confined to parks and books.

  4. To compare Connor Prairie or the Zoo to a random old house is a big ridiculous. If it were any where near the level of significance there wouldn't be a major funding gap. Put a big billboard on I-69 funded by the tourism board for people to come visit this old house, and I doubt there would be any takers, since other than age there is no significance whatsoever. Clearly the tax payers of Fishers don't have a significant interest in this project, so PLEASE DON'T USE OUR VALUABLE MONEY. Government money is finite and needs to be utilized for the most efficient and productive purposes. This is far from that.

  5. I only tried it 2x and didn't think much of it both times. With the new apts plus a couple other of new developments on Guilford, I am surprised it didn't get more business. Plus you have a couple of subdivisions across the street from it. I hope Upland can keep it going. Good beer and food plus a neat environment and outdoor seating.