IBJNews

Advocates: Vouchers living up to expectations

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Nearly 4,000 students who formerly attended public schools are receiving tax money to help pay the cost of private school under Indiana's school voucher program, which is believed to be the nation's largest, officials say.

Advocates say the voucher program is meeting expectations in its first year, despite a late start due in part to a legal challenge. Although the program's first-year cap of 7,500 was not reached, its proponents say that they're pleased with the level of participation.

"We had only a short window to implement the program," School Choice Indiana Executive Director Lindsey Brown told the Evansville Courier & Press. "We were never concerned we were going to hit the cap."

Gov. Mitch Daniels and the GOP-led General Assembly this year gave Indiana the nation's broadest private-school voucher program in the country. Supporters say voucher programs give parents more choices about where to send their children and force public schools to be more competitive, but opponents say they drain funding from the public school system and wrongly divert public money to private religious institutions. A group of teachers and religious leaders is suing to overturn the law.

Under the new program, vouchers can cover up to 90 percent of the cost of tuition, depending on a family's income. The actual value of the vouchers is less than the amount of tax money a public school would have received for that student. The maximum value for students in first through eighth grade is $4,500.

School Choice Indiana says 85 percent of the students who have received vouchers qualify for free- or reduced-price lunch and 53 percent are minorities.

Sixty-nine percent of voucher recipients are from metropolitan areas, while 16 percent are from suburbs and 15 percent are from rural areas.

Indiana's program will be limited to 7,500 students this coming school year and 15,000 next year, but then there will be no limit on the number of children who could enroll as long as their parents fall within income limits. Families of four currently earning up to about $60,000 a year could receive them.

"We're not super-concerned about hitting the cap, but the longer the program is in place, the easier it will be to spread the word," Brown said. "I think you'll see it grow quite expansively."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Agree
    Yes, Private education is a choice. That is why the voucher program is a good decision, it allows you to make that choice.
  • Agree
    Yes, Private education is a choice. That is why the voucher program is a good decision, it allows you to make that choice.
  • Vouchers
    I hate seeing my tax dollars used to pay tuition for Private/Parochial Schools. Private education is a choice and tuition has always been a part of that decision. Why reimburse those folks now!!! State cannot afford it!

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

    2. Shouldn't this be a museum

    3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

    4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

    5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

    ADVERTISEMENT