The nation's third-largest health insurance company is the latest to leave the individual policy market in Indiana in
another sign of diminishing competition to consumers who purchase policies through a state insurance exchange under
the federal health care overhaul.
Aetna Inc. informed the Indiana Department of Insurance in an April 29 letter that it intends to cancel all individual policies
on Dec. 1. The letter was made public last week in a letter from Deputy Insurance Commissioner Robyn Crosson to the Centers
for Medicaid and Medicare Services and posted on the state's federal health care overhaul website, www.in.gov/aca/.
Aetna spokesman Scot Roskelly said Wednesday the carrier currently has only 700 individual health insurance policies in Indiana,
making up only a small fraction of the market, and will remain in other sectors, including small group coverage.
"The administrative costs of overseeing just 700 members are relatively high," Roskelly said.
However, Crosson, in her letter, said Aetna was leaving the Indiana individual market over a rule in the federal health care
overhaul that insurers essentially must dedicate 80 percent of the premiums they collect to medical care. Anything less than
80 percent would be paid as rebates to policyholders the following year.
Crosson said Aetna and four other insurers — Pekin, American Community Mutual, Cigna, and Guardian Life — cited
the 80 percent rule, known formally as the medical loss ratio, as their reasons for leaving the individual market in Indiana
over the past year.
Indiana's health insurance market for individuals is dominated by Indianapolis-based Anthem with a 65-percent share,
according to Crosson's letter and the state's Medicaid actuary, Milliman Inc. Anthem and four other companies control
90 percent of the market.
However, consumer advocates say the exodus of Aetna and other companies likely will result in fewer choices and higher costs
for consumers under health insurance exchanges to be established in 2014 under the federal health care overhaul. The exchanges
will pool the resources of large groups of people to offer more affordable health insurance.
About 200,000 Indiana residents now have individual polices rather than employer-provided coverage. About 875,000 have no
insurance at all, a number Milliman forecasts to fall by about half by 2019 while the number of individuals with policies
swells to between 450,000 and 875,000.
"In Indiana and most other states, the anticipation is that most of the new coverage offered through the exchanges will
be through individual policies," said public health insurance advocate David Roos of Covering Kids and Families of Indiana.
"Aetna is not a small player."
The Insurance Department's health care director, Logan Harrison, said it's not clear how Aetna's departure from
the individual market will affect an Indiana insurance exchange offering individual coverage. He stressed that the state has
not decided yet whether it will create an exchange itself or leave it up to the federal government.
The Insurance Department has asked CMS for a waiver that would phase in the 80 percent rule, which took effect Jan. 1, over
several years. It has proposed a medical-loss ratio of 65 percent this year, increasing gradually to 80 percent in 2015. It's
not clear when CMS will decide whether to grant Indiana a waiver. Other states also have requested waivers.

















IBJ Conversations
6 Comments
Add Comment
This isn't hypothetical, it's already happening as witnessed here, and in other states.
You have no idea of what you are talking about. What is your solution, give it to the gov'mint?
Or just what?
Companies claim they need healthy policy holders to offset the sick ones, but that doesn't account for the massive profits they're now taking. They'd need 20 to 40 times the healthy to make these large profits.
This action was expected. Notice how the push is now on selling life insurance. These large companies used to cover all insurance types under one general company. They now split into separate companies, including health and life, to take losses in one area and protect huge wealth in another part of the company. The former arrangement allowed sharing the losses and gains. (Like a store that sells more shoes than gloves, except now both departments are independent companies).
It's time to either tell these companies that they sell all insurance offerings in the state, they operate as one firm and cover their own profits and losses OR, the preferable, we tell them, "NO MORE MONEY FOR YOU!" We're paying the medical provider for services---not a coding company, insurance biller and the insurance company.