After 2008 change, Indiana returns to GOP roots

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Change didn't last long in Indiana.

The state that in 2008 chose its first Democrat for president since 1964 embraced Republicans across the ballot Tuesday as voters expressed concerns about the economy, big government and the Obama administration's health care overhaul.

Republicans picked up the U.S. Senate seat vacated by Democrat Evan Bayh and two southern Indiana congressional seats that had been held by Democrats Baron Hill and Brad Ellsworth, who lost the Senate race to Dan Coats. They also appeared poised to claim a two-thirds majority in the Senate and take control of the state House of Representatives.

Even with some races undecided late Tuesday, Republicans were assured of winning at least 55 seats in the 100-member House, with at least 10 seats switched from Democratic hands to the GOP's.

The wins will give Gov. Mitch Daniels and his Republicans colleagues control over writing a new two-year state budget next year and redrawing the boundaries of Indiana's congressional and legislative districts.

Daniels actively recruited Republican candidates to challenge Democratic incumbents, with his Aiming Higher political action committee providing key financial support.

"It'll be much easier to keep the books of the state in balance and keep Indiana as virtually the only state in the black without raising taxes," Daniels said.

Republicans picked up at least three seats from Democrats in Senate races after entering the day needing only one to gain at least a two-thirds majority, and with it the power to conduct business without any Democrats present.

With Republicans controlling the governor's office and the Senate, only a 52-48 Democratic majority in the House had stood in the way of Daniels' legislative initiatives. Daniels said local government reform bills had passed the Senate only to die in the House.

"We hope that those will at least get a fair hearing over there," the governor said.

The Democratic incumbents going down to defeat included House Majority Leader Russ Stilwell, the second-in-command to outgoing Speaker Patrick Bauer of South Bend.

"We will live to fight another day," said Bauer, who won re-election comfortably.


  • Grammar
    "Second-in-comment"...????? I don't even think spell check would have missed this flub.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. John, unfortunately CTRWD wants to put the tank(s) right next to a nature preserve and at the southern entrance to Carmel off of Keystone. Not exactly the kind of message you want to send to residents and visitors (come see our tanks as you enter our city and we build stuff in nature preserves...

  2. 85 feet for an ambitious project? I could shoot ej*culate farther than that.

  3. I tried, can't take it anymore. Untill Katz is replaced I can't listen anymore.

  4. Perhaps, but they've had a very active program to reduce rainwater/sump pump inflows for a number of years. But you are correct that controlling these peak flows will require spending more money - surge tanks, lines or removing storm water inflow at the source.

  5. All sewage goes to the Carmel treatment plant on the White River at 96th St. Rainfall should not affect sewage flows, but somehow it does - and the increased rate is more than the plant can handle a few times each year. One big source is typically homeowners who have their sump pumps connect into the sanitary sewer line rather than to the storm sewer line or yard. So we (Carmel and Clay Twp) need someway to hold the excess flow for a few days until the plant can process this material. Carmel wants the surge tank located at the treatment plant but than means an expensive underground line has to be installed through residential areas while CTRWD wants the surge tank located further 'upstream' from the treatment plant which costs less. Either solution works from an environmental control perspective. The less expensive solution means some people would likely have an unsightly tank near them. Carmel wants the more expensive solution - surprise!