
If intent were all that mattered, I would be writing in praise of Hoosier Bard’s production of “Young Hamlet”—the
earliest known draft of Shakespeare’s tragedy.
The new company, built from a core of IUPUI scholars, aims to “make classic plays new and exciting for 21st century
audiences.” An ambitious idea. Truth is, we don’t really have a theater here in central Indiana with a consistent
drive to breathe life into plays of yesteryear. Although, to be fair, others—including the Indiana Repertory Theatre
and Butler University Theatre—cycle Shakespeare’s work onto their stages on a reasonably regular basis. (FYI:
Butler is offering “As You Like It” in early March.) Plus, there’s the annual summer production from Heartland
Actors Repertory Theatre at White River State Park, the audience for which is growing.
In a pre-show speech offered before the Feb. 11 performance of “Young Hamlet” at the IndyFringe Building, Gary
Taylor, general editor of The New Oxford Shakespeare and a driving force in Hoosier Bard, stated additional ambitious goals
for the company. He wants Hoosier Bard to be a theater that speaks to young people. He sees it as a means of testing the theories
of scholars with shows that aren’t necessarily “safe.” And he wants to do shows on the scale intended by
the author, labeling reduced shows—such as the touring Actors from the London Stage’s five-actor versions—as
“not Shakespeare.”
“Really doing Shakespeare,” said Taylor, “means a large cast” since Shakespeare created entire social
worlds.
But how much should intentions play a part when the execution
is below even the level expected of amateur companies? And what to make of the grueling 2-1/2 hours that followed that noble
speech?
I’ve seen a “Hamlet” with a nude Polonius. I’ve seen “The Tempest” where kitchen utensils
fell out of the sky. I’ve seen “Taming of the Shrew” in the old west, “Julius Caesar” in a South
American dictatorship, and various Shakespeare works turned into the equivalent of Classics Illustrated comics by severely
truncated running times. But I’ve never seen a Shakespeare play as deadly dull as “Young Hamlet”—one
with as many actors falling this far short of the skills required.
In a nutshell, “Young Hamlet” is “Hamlet” with some name and word changes, a bit more sympathy toward
Gertrude, a younger prince who behaves even worse in his feigned madness, and no off-stage pirate ship action that you probably
forgot was even in the show.
Lifelessly staged, inconsistently accented, awkwardly lit and without regard for coherent motivations, “Young Hamlet”
(which ran Feb. 4-12 and received polite notices elsewhere) wasn’t just a failed experiment. It was an effort to create
something so beyond the reach of its creators that I’m tempted to question their hubris.
It’s akin to your deciding to stage a grand opera in your office break room with folks from the IT department providing
the music and the HR crew singing leads. Ambitious: yes. Chance of actually being artistically satisfying: nil.
I suppose there may be some interest in the show among scholars, but that aim would have been better served by a script-in-hand
reading with actors that weren’t in desperate need of the services of Geoffrey Rush’s character from “The
King’s Speech.” Only Lauren Briggeman, as Horatio, emerged relatively unscathed. The rest, by no fault of their
own, were just in over their heads.
As for the desire to be more “youthful,” Hoosier Bard’s “Young Hamlet” seemed no more appealing
to teens and twentysomethings than the IRT’s “Romeo and Juliet” last year or Butler’s staged-in-the-dirt
“Hamlet” from a few seasons back.
I strongly believe in both the edification and the entertainment to be found in the works of Shakespeare. I’m second
to none in my desire to see more quality Shakespeare in Indy.
But the key word there is quality.
__________
Seeing “Hairspray” (at Beef & Boards Dinner Theatre through March 27), I was again amazed at the musical
equivalent of a series of three-point shots landed right at the top of the game by the composer/lyricist team of March Shaiman
and Scott Wittman.
First they swish with a charming, fun, here-I-am song, “Good Morning Baltimore,” introducing us to their optimistic
teen heroine. Then, swish, they switch up and sink another with “The Nicest Kids in Town,” establishing the world
of the TV studio and its teen dance show.
Then, boom, it’s the delightful “Mama, I’m a Big Girl Now,” with three sets of mothers/daughters
and their respective generation gaps. And then, already in musical theater heaven, we get “I Can Hear the Bells,”
one of the most fun, character-specific love songs in recent musical theater.
No musical, of course, can sustain that for the whole game. But Shaiman and Wittman make a remarkable go of it. And Beef
& Boards offers a respectable production that misses some of the big laughs but nails the sweetness. I particularly liked
the way Jill Sullivan’s Tracy always seemed to be hungry to learn the dance moves of those around her by watching their
feet.
Unfortunately, Carly Vernon was made to play sidekick Penny Pingleton as more of a stereotypical nerd than an original goofball—which,
in addition to being less interesting, made it difficult to believe the interest the liquid-legged Seaweed of Jarvis B. Manning
Jr. developed in her.
__________
For Ashley Brown’s pops program with the Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra, Jack Everly once again put together an entertaining
program that showed off both the musicians and their talented guest.
I caught the truncated Friday afternoon version of the show (which ran Feb. 11-13) and was pleased that some initial awkward
banter from Brown and a few good enough attempts to show other sides to her (“La Jazz Hot” from “Victor/Victoria,”
for instance), soon gave way to tunes that better played to her many strengths.
“Feed the Birds,” from “Mary Poppins” showed clearly what time spent with a song can do to its clarity
and richness (Brown played the lead on Broadway). A Disney medley followed. It had a fun “name-that-tune” quality,
with Brown adept at everything from “Part of Your World” to “When You Wish Upon a Star.” It was a
reminder of the great songs that no longer seem to have a place on the pre-teen-focused RadioDisney.
Brown, who had her professional orchestra debut with the ISO in 2005 as the female singer on a “Broadway Leading Men”
program, was supported by three gents who brought their talents to a duet medley, including “People Will Say We’re
in Love,” “Someone to Watch Over Me,” and “My Heart is So Full of You” (oh, to hear the ISO
do the entire “Most Happy Fella” score—with Brown singing the female lead).
Ending the set with “Defying Gravity” was an odd move, given that the song’s “owner,” Idina
Menzel, will be appearing with the ISO next month and, no doubt, doing the same song. Brown delivered it well, though, and
was charmingly herself for a weekend-appropriate encore of “My Funny Valentine” sung to her dog who, yes, opened
his mouth to speak at just the right time.•
__________
This column appears weekly. Send information on upcoming arts and entertainment events to lharry@ibj.com. Twitter: IBJArts
and follow Lou Harry’s A&E blog at www.ibj.com/arts.

















IBJ Conversations
16 Comments
Add Comment
Wow - that's an overstatement...
Sensitive much?
Again: I'm glad you and others enjoyed the production. I had and have no intention of trying to change your opinion.
When specific questions are asked--as they were from the posters here--I felt they deserved responses. To me, that's not shouting down. It's having a conversation.
Whatever the case, I hope that you and the other posters continue to experience the live arts in Indy and beyond. And that others continue to add perspectives to this and other reviews.
Respectfully,
Lou
I guess I exaggerated because I was exasperated. I resent the way you dismiss everything that I and your other readers say. You remind me of Mubarek and Ghadafi, trying to shout down all the young people protesting your old-fashioned views, trying to discredit us, claiming that there's some kind of secret conspiracy ("friends-of-the-cast"). Can't you just admit that you might possibly be wrong? and a lot of other people might be right? that a bunch of us saw something new and exciting and relevant to our lives?
But I don't think there's any point arguing with you. I just know never to trust your judgment of what's good theatre and what is not.
I guess I exaggerated because I was exasperated. I resent the way you dismiss everything that I and your other readers say. You remind me of Mubarek and Ghadafi, trying to shout down all the young people protesting your old-fashioned views, trying to discredit us, claiming that there's some kind of secret conspiracy ("friends-of-the-cast"). Can't you just admit that you might possibly be wrong? and a lot of other people might be right? that a bunch of us saw something new and exciting and relevant to our lives?
But I don't think there's any point arguing with you. I just know never to trust your judgment of what's good theatre and what is not.
As I said to the others, I'm glad you enjoyed the production.
In response to your questions:
--"If it were just relatives and friends of the cast, why doesn't every show at the Fringe attract audiences like that?" Well, most Fringe Building shows don't have gigantic casts made up mostly of students and teachers from a local college--or have ticket prices this low ($8 for students) so that the college-agers can actually go. That being said, I'm sure there were some in the audience not connected to the cast and crew. But the cast size certainly impacted ticket sales. It's why community theaters put armies of orphans in 'Annie.'
--"You must be out of your mind to prefer those crappy Butler shows. Did you see their boring Merchant of Venice last year?" As far as I know, I am in reasonably sound mental health. And, no, I didn't see 'Merchant.' And, for the record, I don't love everything that Butler does. I approach each production the same way that I approached 'Young Hamlet.'
-"By 'quality' I think you just mean 'money'." Nope, I actually meant quality. I've been very critical of high budget shows and very positive about low-budgeters. It's the work, not the coin.
--"Everyone was better than ANYone in that lame Heartland 'Two Gentleman.'" With that statement, you lost credibility. While hardly a world-class production, there were some fine actors in that show. Seriously think about the worst performers in 'Young Hamlet" and put them up against a Ryan Artzberger. No comparison.
Respectfully,
Lou
To respond to specifics comments:
George: One definition of quality, for me, is "Work that is likely to stand up without an audience full of friends, family, coworkers, and coworkers of the cast and crew."
Max: The "maybe you have to be young to get it" might apply to a show by the Wiggles, but not to quality drama. (The same is often said of "Spring Awakening," which I saw and appreciated again last night.)
Charles: Of course we aren't gods. Nobody that I know of claimed we were. We are, ideally, passionate advocates for excellence who are blessed to be in a place where we can wrestle with our arts experiences, turn them into prose, and share them with an active, interested readership.
Ryan: Nope. Wasn't asleep. Would have told readers if I was.
Mary: Nope. I was there. And based on post-show conversation, I wasn't alone in my thoughts on the work. And, even if I was alone, I'd still share those same thoughts. It's what I do.
Thanks for reading IBJ and I look forward to your feedback on future stories. Remember, too, that every Monday I post a You-review-it blog at www.ibj.com/arts. I'd love for all of you to make it a habit of letting me (and IBJ readers) know your thoughts on other A&E you've seen.
Be well,
Lou
"The quality of mercy is not strained" -- Shakespeare.
A great young Hamlet...
An amazing Ofelia...
An audience that was thoroughly engaged..
A sell-out crowd--at the Fringe--40+ people turned away the night I went.
It was just what Indy needed -- and needs!
Were you asleep?
a new theatre lover!