Allison Transmission files for $750M IPO

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Allison Transmission Inc. is counting on upgrades to truck and bus fleets in countries like China and India for its future growth, the company revealed in a filing it made Friday to raise up to $750 million through an initial public offering.

The Speedway-based company, which makes automatic transmissions for fire trucks, school buses, garbage trucks and other vehicles, dominates the U.S. market in its category.

Modernization in emerging markets represents a "major growth opportunity," Allison said in its prospectus filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Automatic transmissions, which are beneficial for stop-and-go driving, are typical in North America, with nearly 79 percent of medium- and heavy-duty trucks sold last year equipped with them. By contrast, fewer than 5 percent of commercial trucks sold overseas were equipped with automatics, according to Allison's research.

Allison noted that more Chinese cities are using garbage trucks to collect household waste, and Indian truck makers are utilizing more modern equipment.

Allison has a foothold in China, where its product is in 30,000 vehicles, and in India, where it established manufacturing in 2010. Later this year, it expects to open a smaller manufacturing facility in Hungary in a partnership with its former parent company, General Motors.

At this point, however, Allison's major presence is in the United States, where it derived 73 percent of its 2010 sales of $1.9 billion.

After two years of losses exceeding $300 million, Allison turned a $29.6 million profit in 2010. Over the past three years, the company also boosted its  investment in research and engineering so it has "more new products under development today than at any time in our history," it said.

Aided by a Department of Energy grant, Allison is working on a hybrid-propulsion system for commercial trucks. The company is also developing a transmission for tractor trucks that spend the majority of their time in cities. Allison has little presence in the heaviest truck class, so the new transmission could add a brand-new revenue segment.

Among the risks Allison noted for would-be investors is its $3.7 billion in debt.

Another is a heavily unionized workforce. About 60 percent of its 2,750 employees worldwide are represented by the United Auto Workers, whose contract expires in 2012. Allison considers its relations with UAW Local 933 to be good. The company noted that 60 percent of its total workforce, both salaried and hourly, is retirement eligible, which could mean cost savings in the future.

GM spun off Allison in 2007 to private-equity owners Carlyle Group and Onex. Allison expects that its two "sponsors" will continue to control a majority of voting rights after the IPO.

CEO Lawrence Dewey owns 1.1 percent of current stock. Dewey, 54, has been with the company since 1989 and earned a base salary of $437,500 last year.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Looking at the two companies - in spite of their relative size to one another -- Ricker's image is (by all accounts) pretty solid and reputable. Their locations are clean, employees are friendly and the products they offer are reasonably priced. By contrast, BP locations are all over the place and their reputation is poor, especially when you consider this is the same "company" whose disastrous oil spill and their response was nothing short of irresponsible should tell you a lot. The fact you also have people who are experienced in franchising saying their system/strategy is flawed is a good indication that another "spill" has occurred and it's the AM-PM/Ricker's customers/company that are having to deal with it.

  2. Daniel Lilly - Glad to hear about your points and miles. Enjoy Wisconsin and Illinois. You don't care one whit about financial discipline, which is why you will blast the "GOP". Classic liberalism.

  3. Isn't the real reason the terrain? The planners under-estimated the undulating terrain, sink holes, karst features, etc. This portion of the route was flawed from the beginning.

  4. You thought no Indy was bad, how's no fans working out for you? THe IRl No direct competition and still no fans. Hey George Family, spend another billion dollars, that will fix it.

  5. I live downtown Indy and had to be in downtown Chicago for a meeting. In other words, I am the target demographic for this train. It leaves at 6:00-- early but doable. Then I saw it takes 5+ hours. No way. I drove. I'm sure I paid 3 to 5 times as much once you factor in gas, parking, and tolls, but it was reimbursed so not a factor for me. Any business traveler is going to take the option that gets there quickly and reliably... and leisure travelers are going to take the option that has a good schedule and promotional prices (i.e., Megabus). Indy to Chicago is the right distance (too short to fly but takes several hours to drive) that this train could be extremely successful even without subsidies, if they could figure out how to have several frequencies (at least 3x/day) and make the trip in a reasonable amount of time. For those who have never lived on the east coast-- Amtrak is the #1 choice for NY-DC and NY-Boston. They have the Acela service, it runs almost every hour, and it takes you from downtown to downtown. It beats driving and flying hands down. It is too bad that we cannot build something like this in the midwest, at least to connect the bigger cities.