IBJNews

Allison Transmission profits tripled in 2011

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Interest in Allison Transmission’s initial public stock offering may shift to a higher gear with the Speedway manufacturer disclosing this month that it more than tripled profits in 2011.

Profit of $103 million last year compares with a profit of $29.6 million in 2010 and a loss of $323.9 million in 2009, according to a document Allison filed Feb. 17 with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of its planned IPO.

Allison cited stronger demand for global on- and off-highway transmissions and parts.

Sales last year rose 12 percent, to $2.2 billion.

In the short term, analysts say, truck engine and transmission companies stand to gain as the economy rebounds and fleets that deferred truck purchases start buying again.

“These are companies coming back pretty strong, particularly in North America,” said Mark Foster, chief investment officer at Kirr Marbach & Co. in Columbus, Ind.
Longer term, Allison should see growth in markets in China and India, where automatic truck transmissions are relatively rare.

Given the higher price of automatic transmissions, however, it remains to be seen whether Allison will benefit in some price-sensitive markets in other countries, Foster said.

Allison cites Frost & Sullivan estimates that, in 2010, fully automatic transmissions represented 37.8 percent of transmissions sold in the North American medium- and heavy-duty commercial vehicle markets, compared with 6.1 percent in Western Europe. By 2017, they are expected to grow to 41.8 percent and 10.9 percent, respectively.

Dragging down Allison's results last year were military sales, which fell 14 percent.

The company has nearly 2,800 employees, most of them in the Indianapolis area.  However, in 2010, Allison opened a plant in Chennai, India, and has teamed with GM Powertrain on a plant in Hungary.

General Motors spun off Allison in 2007 for $5.6 billion. Holding a controlling interest are the private-equity groups Onex and Carlyle Group.

Allison officials declined to comment on last year’s financial performance, citing restrictions involving the pending IPO.  The company disclosed previously that it hopes to raise $750 million by going public.

Allison dominates the U.S. market in the sale of automatic transmissions in categories such as firetrucks, school buses and garbage trucks.

“We believe the anticipated increase in global commercial vehicle production, together with pent-up demand in the North American market that resulted from the deferral of purchases during the economic downturn, will support our continued growth and result in increased net sales,” the company said in the recent filing.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • ALLISON
    Here it is
  • Congratulations
    Congratulations to the management and workforce at Allison Transmission, for a great 2011 result. I am not totally excited about the plants in India and Hungary, but I accept the fact that growth will need to come from foreign sales. In order to be competitive in foreign markets, it may require a company supply foreign manufacturers from a plant that is closer to the customer. I believe that all US Manufacturing Companies that increase employment by more than 10% each fiscal year, be given a 50% reduction in the firms Corporate Federal Tax Bill for that Fiscal Year. Since I am not in a position to actually impact that decision, I recommend that everyone suggest such a change in the Tax Code to their respective Congressional Representative. Let's reward companies that put people back to work.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT