IBJOpinion

ALTOM: Does Bing have a chance of catching Google?

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Tim Altom

I can’t help it; every time I see the Microsoft search engine “Bing,” I hear Bing Crosby’s voice crooning in my head.

Microsoft hasn’t said that Der Bingle was the inspiration for the Bing name, of course. Rather, it’s said to be one-syllable, easy to remember, and ripe for being rendered as a verb (“I could Bing that for you if you want … ”). Bing never has been touted by Microsoft as a Google-killer, but plenty of commentators have called it that. Mostly in jest.

Few people seriously think Bing (www.bing.com) can successfully stage an assault across the massive moat that Google (www.google.com) has built around its flagship product. But truth be told, Bing is not a bad search engine.

Unlike Google, which sprang onto the world almost fully grown, Bing has a long history of evolutionary development. Its earliest ancestor was a small search engine called “MSN Search” back in 1998, about the time Google was filing its incorporation papers. But the comparison stops there. Google’s founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin had their search engine coded and ready to go, while MSN Search was badged only as Microsoft. It actually used results from other small search engines, such as AltaVista.

Over the next few years, both its name and its code morphed. In 2006, Microsoft finally coded its own engine and renamed it “Windows Live Search.” Then in 2007, Microsoft dropped the “Windows” part of the name. The search engine kept shifting and changing even after that, absorbing some other products and eventually becoming Bing in 2009. One of Bing’s earlier competitors, Yahoo, has capitulated and become just a display site for Bing searches. Worldwide, Bing now has about 10 percent of the market, when combined with Yahoo.

Bing is a decent competitor to Google, but not a really formidable one. To me, the differences are mostly a matter of taste. Google’s interface says, “You wanna search for something? Let me get outta your way!” Bing’s interface says, “Aren’t baby seals cute? It’s a great day to search, isn’t it?” Bing is more decorative and fun. Google is more Spartan and its controls are easier to spot on the page. But query “IBJ” and both come up with www.ibj.com right at the top, along with related searches and additional links. Google works well with its own Gmail, while Bing integrates with Microsoft’s Hotmail.

Bing does offer some small improvements in other ways. For example, its video search page has previews. Just hover over one of the video thumbnails and you’ll get a short snatch of video just to see if that’s the one you want. There’s a difference behind the scenes in its maps, too. Bing uses Microsoft’s Silverlight to display maps, while Google relies on tried-and-true JavaScript. Silverlight is an application for showing advanced graphics in browsers, and it struts its stuff in Bing maps. Whereas Google maps tend to move jerkily, Bing maps are much smoother. But you do need to download Silverlight. Like Google, Bing searches for images. Unlike Google, there’s no search engine specifically for patents or scholarly papers.

Google is way out ahead in offering online applications. Book scans are peculiar to Google, as are Google Docs and Google Calendar. I’m quite partial to Google Reader, an aggregator for other sites where you can instantly spot updates to blogs or other sites you want to follow. But Bing isn’t by any means a one-trick pony itself. It’s hooked up with Wolfram Alpha, a math-and-science search engine that can even do advanced math. It has a dedicated dictionary, provisions for searching Twitter and Facebook, a translation application, and travelers may appreciate its integration of Microsoft’s Farecast, which allows Bing to look up deals in air fares and reservations. Like Google, it also can search shopping sites, forecast weather and present news from other sites as an aggregator.

Unfortunately for Bing, in the search engine business it’s all about habitual use, and the searching public is definitely fixated on using Google. Bing has some improvements over Google in some areas, but it has yet to eat into Google’s lead. Google still commands some 80 percent or more of the global search engine market. This is important, because Google can also command the vast majority of search engine marketing dollars. If you want to get your company noticed, Google is the obvious choice for an ad buy.

By all means, try Bing and see what you think. Microsoft can always hope it catches Google by the time our sun burns out.•

__________

Altom is a consultant specializing in pairing businesses with appropriate technology. His column appears every other week. He can be reached at taltom@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Bing is growing
    Okay it looks like I will be the only one to post here, but here is what I think. Microsoft is one of maybe only 2 or 3 companies in the world that could even afford to take on Google in online search. From what I am seeing, Bing really is the only search provider that is bringing innovation rather than been there done that that is Google. Google has instant search, but for soldiers that are deployed using slower bandwidth, like me, and people still using dial speed connections, its a waste of time. But where Google is really dominating to me is in the News Search, people just don't post any relevant news on Bing, and for users like me that is all I read most of the time. Therefore, for the time being, Google is the search engine of choice until more publications are posting on Bing.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. OK Larry, let's sign Lance, shore up the PG and let's get to the finals.

  2. A couple of issues need some clarification especially since my name was on the list. I am not sure how this information was obtained and from where. For me, the amount was incorrect to begin with and the money does not come to me personally. I am guessing that the names listed are the Principal Investigators (individual responsible for the conduct of the trail) for the different pharmaceutical trials and not the entity which receives the checks. In my case, I participate in Phase II and Phase III trials which are required for new drug development. Your article should differentiate the amount of money received for consulting, for speaking fees, and for conduct of a clinical trial for new drug development. The lumping of all of these categories may give the reader a false impression of physicians just trying to get rich. The Sunshine Law may help to differentiate these categories in the future. The public should be aware that the Clinical Trial Industry could be a real economic driver for Indiana since these revenues supports jobs and new job creation. Nationally, this account for 10-20 billion which our State is missing out on to a large degree. Yes, new drug and technology development has gotten most of the attention (e.g. CTSI, BioCrossroads, etc.) However, serious money is being left on the table by not participating in the clinical trials to get those new drugs and medical devices on the market!!!! I guess that this is not sexy enough for academia.

  3. The address given for the Goldfish Swim Club is the Ace Hardware, is it closing?

  4. Out of state management and ownership. If Kite controlled it, everything would be leased. Of course, due to the roundabout, there is limited access to the south side of 116th now also. Just have to go down to the light.

  5. Hey smudge, You're opposed to arresting people for minor crimes? Sounds great! We should only focus on murders and such, right? Let's stand around and wait until someone shoots someone before we act. Whatever we do, we should never question anyone, frisk anyone, or arrest anyone unless they are actively engaged in shooting or stabbing. Very sound!

ADVERTISEMENT