IBJNews

Ambrose snags large industrial deal

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Ambrose Property Group will break ground next month on its first industrial project, a 545,010-square-foot national distribution center for Gordmans Inc.

The Omaha-based apparel and home-decor retailer chose the Hendricks County project submitted by Ambrose from among about 20 other proposals, many of which came from developers with decades of experience in the industrial sector.

"It's a huge challenge and battle when you're trying to land your first deal in this arena," said Aasif Bade, a co-founder of five-year-old Ambrose, which has made a name for itself in multi-family and office development.

Bade thinks his firm's newness to the sector gave it an advantage over veteran industrial developers. "When a company has a tremendous amount of experience" they can tend to dictate to the client how a deal should be put together, he said.  

The Gordmans distribution center—its second in the Midwest—is an approximately $25 million project for Ambrose, which will retain ownership of the building. The total capital investment, including equipment, is $37.5 million.

The Indiana Economic Development Corp. agreed to provide up to $1.1 million in conditional tax credits in exchange for Gordmans promise to employ as many as 250 people at the facility by 2017, according to a statement released by IEDC in January. Hendricks County approved additional property tax abatement.

Cassidy Turley was in charge of lining up government incentives and represented Gordmans in the search for a developer. That process started last September.

Katie Culp, a senior managing director at Cassidy Turley who helped put together economic incentives for the deal, said Gordmans and Ambrose were a good fit for a couple of reasons.

"Gordmans is an entrepreneurial company," she said, so they were drawn to Ambrose, which is small and nimble. And Gordmans liked the location Ambrose proposed, which is west of Plainfield and outside the biggest concentration of industrial properties in the area.
 
Ambrose had expected to enter the industrial fray by building a $12 million, 300,000-square-foot spec warehouse on a 21-acre site at Metropolis and Airtech parkways in Hendricks County. Bade said the firm is still pursuing a partner for that deal.

While Ambrose is new to industrial development, its principals are not. Bade worked in industrial leasing and development for Duke Realty Corp. before striking out on his own. And Kyle Powell, an Ambrose vice president, was formerly an industrial broker with Cassidy Turley.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT