Anderson University cuts staff, majors as enrollment drops

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

After suffering a 7-percent dip in enrollment, Anderson University will cut 4 percent of its workforce and eliminate its theater, philosophy and French majors, according to the Herald Bulletin.

In a prepared statement released Friday, the Christian liberal arts university said “converging external economic factors” have put pressure on the school’s finances. Those include greater price sensitivity among families and students, reduced student-aid funding from the Indiana Commission for Higher Education, and depressed investment returns that have limited income from the university’s endowment.

In response, Anderson officials are trying to cut $3 million from the school’s $65 million annual budget. Toward that goal, the school plans to lay off 16 faculty and staff members by July 1 out of its total workforce of 400. In addition to no longer offering theater, philosophy and French as majors, the school will combine art and communications into a single major called visual and communications arts.

According to the Herald Bulletin, those actions will save the school $1.7 million. The school has already identified further cuts in other departments, and has been discussing those changes with the affected faculty and staff members, according to the statement. University officials are also looking at administrative savings, a curriculum revamp and changes in pricing.

“There has been a marked change in the fundamental nature of higher education,” said Anderson President James Edwards. “As we continue to monitor and assess this situation, we realize that we must respond differently to the expectations of families as well as to the nature of our operational model. Many institutions across academia will need to make these adjustments and those that don’t will continue to struggle.”

Anderson enrolled the equivalent of 1,628 students this year, down from 1,753 the year before, according to the Herald Bulletin. Its listed price for tuition and fees is $26,200, although the actual price to most students after discounts is about half that amount. Room and board costs another $9,100.

When considered collectively, private liberal arts colleges like Anderson constitute the second-largest university system in Indiana. Thirty-one independent schools enroll more than 77,000 full-time equivalent students, which trails only the Indiana University system.

But all of those liberal arts schools are being forced to rethink their high-touch, high-cost model of education.

In addition to students’ pinched finances, the ability of donors to keep juicing the endowments and scholarship funds of private colleges remains depressed due to market jitters. And now improvements in online technology are threatening to pull students away from the traditional college experience.

In response, some colleges are cutting prices, some are embracing online technology, and some are launching professional programs to help subsidize their core undergraduate mission.


  • Research First
    I would just like to say that further research is needed through your comment. Anderson University has made other changes including development, staff, management, etc. This is not only faculty. This announcement at THIS time includes faculty, but in the past positions have been eliminated and not filled, or people have retired without replacements filled. This is actually one of the FIRST cuts to faculty during this re-prioritization.
  • More on the way
    Big changes in store for virtually all higher education institutions, not just Anderson U. The current model of large annual tuition hikes and enormous student debt loads is not sustainable, particularly (as the article notes) in the face of increasing competition from other ways of learning. My guess is that at some point in the not-so-distant future most students will study online and visit physical campuses only to take proctored exams and complete hands-on laboratory classes. Modern technology makes it possible to share excellent lectures to vast audiences at marginal costs approaching zero. That will be very, very hard to compete against, particularly for institutions with less than stellar reputations.
  • Cuts are lopsided
    Why are faculty paying the price for this? Why not cut those in charge of raising and managing money? Faculty is punished, while administrators, development officers, recruiters, business managers remain unscathed. Shame on this Christian institution.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Great article and post scripts by Mike L (Great addition to IBJ BTW). Bobby's stubborn as a mule, and doubt if he ever comes back to IU. But the love he would receive would be enormous. Hope he shows some time, but not counting on it.

    2. When the Indiana GOP was going around the State selling the Voucher bill they were promising people that the vouchers would only be for public charter schools. They lied. As usual.

    3. I am Mr. Morris Ray, a Legitimate And a Reputable money Lender. We lend funds out to individuals in need of financial assistance, we give loan to people that have a bad credit or in need of money to pay bills, to invest on business. Have you been looking for loan? you have not to worry, because you are in the right place i offer loan at low interest rate of 2% so if you are in need of a loan i want you to just contact me via this email Address: morris_ray123@outlook.com

    4. Jim, your "misleading" numbers comment is spot on. This is the spin these posers are putting on it. News flash, fans: these guys lie. They are not publicly traded so no one holds them accountable for anything they say. The TV numbers are so miniscule to begin with any "increase" produces double digit "growth" numbers. It's ridiculous to think that anything these guys have done has awakened the marketplace. What have they done? Consolidate the season so they run more races on consecutive weekends? And this creates "momentum." Is that the same momentum you enjoy when you don't race between August and March? Keep in mind that you are running teams who barely make ends meet ragged over the summer to accomplish this brilliant strategy of avoiding the NFL while you run your season finale at midnight on the East Coast. But I should not obfuscate my own point: any "ratings increase" is exactly what Jim points to - the increased availability of NBC Sports in households. Look fans, I love the sport to but these posers are running it off a cliff. Miles wants to declare victory and then run for Mayor. I could go on and on but bottom line for God's sake don't believe a word they say. Note to Anthony - try doing just a little research instead of reporting what these pretenders say and then offering an "opinion" no more informed than the average fan.

    5. If he's finally planning to do the right thing and resign, why not do it before the election? Waiting until after means what - s special election at tax payer expense? Appointment (by whom?) thus robbing the voters of their chance to choose? Does he accrue some additional financial advantage to waiting, like extra pension payments? What's in it for him? That's the question that needs to be asked.