Analysts predicting slow holiday shopping season

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Retail analysts are predicting a lackluster holiday shopping season, but they disagree on just how slow it will be.

Richard Feinberg, a Purdue University professor of consumer sciences and retailing, predicted retail sales this season won't be as strong as last year's. He expects sales ranging from flat to 5 percent lower than last year, he said in a report issued Monday.

Feinberg cited the end of a Social Security tax reduction this year along with lingering high rates of unemployment and underemployment as causes for stagnant spending.

Consumers spent roughly $590 billion during the 2012 holiday retail season, making up about 20 percent of annual retail sales and 35 percent of profit, according to Feinberg.

The end of the Social Security tax reduction means most families have $700 to $1,000 less in income this year, he said.

"That translates to anywhere from $82 billion to $117 billion that consumers had last year that they don't have this year," Feinberg said in a prepared statement. "And this hasn't been made up by any rise in income or employment."

Feinberg predicted online ordering would increase in the range of 10 percent to 15 percent over last year. Online shopping represents less than 10 percent of all retail sales.

Meanwhile, the International Council of Shopping Centers predicted revenue will rise 3.4 percent during the all-important November and December holiday shopping months, when many mall retailers realize up to 40 percent of their annual sales. Last year the figure rose 3 percent.

The period is particularly important this year since spending was weak during the back-to-school shopping period, the second-busiest shopping months of the year.

While the job picture has been improving in the U.S. and the turnaround in the housing market is gaining traction, the improvements have not been enough to sustain higher levels of spending for most Americans. Most continue to juggle tepid wage gains with a higher cost of living.

"We're going to see a more subdued spending mood from consumers, but what counts is that we're on track to have a better holiday sales season that last year," said Michael Niemira, vice president of research and chief economist for ICSC.

The outlook was somewhat brighter than one from Chicago-based research firm ShopperTrak. Earlier this month, ShopperTrak predicted that retail revenue would rise 2.4 percent during the holiday shopping season, down from a 3-percent rise last year.

This year, there's a shorter shopping window between Black Friday — the day after Thanksgiving, which is usually one of the top two biggest shopping days of the year — and Christmas. Last year there were 32 days during the period and this year there are 25.

The retail industry is still waiting for a widely watched holiday forecast from the National Retail Federation, the nation's largest retail trade group, which will be issuing its report in early October.

Feinberg all holiday sales predictions are subject to many factors that can change at the last minute.

 "Any number of external events can significantly affect holiday retail sales,” he said. “Consumer spending is sensitive to poor weather, government inaction leading to shutdowns, gasoline prices, and geopolitical situations at home and abroad."


  • Christmas Sales
    ...You forgot to mention the fact that By Dec 15th a lot of people will have to spend $350-900 for health care under the new "Obamacare Act"...There Goes my Christmas Spending;-(

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Only half a million TV Viewers? And thats an increase? I knew Indycar was struggling but I didn't know it was that bad. Hell, if NASCAR hits 5 Million viewers everyone starts freaking out saying its going down hill. It has a long way to before Indycar even hits NASCAR's bad days.

  2. IU has been talking that line for years with no real progress even with the last Dean, Dr. Brater. Why will an outsider, Dr. Hess, make a difference? With no proof of additional resources (cash in the bank), and a concrete plan to move an academic model that has been outdated for decades with a faculty complacent with tenure and inertia, I can count on IU to remain the same during the tenure of Dr. Hess. One ought to look to Purdue and Notre Dame for change and innovation. It is just too bad that both of those schools do not have their own medical school. Competition might wake up IU. My guess is, that even with those additions to our State, IU will remain in its own little world squandering our State's tax dollars. Why would any donor want to contribute to IU with its track record? What is its strategy to deal with the physician shortage for our State? New leadership will not be enough for us to expect any change.

  3. How do you think the Bridges got approved? I spent a couple days researching PAC's and individual contributions to some city council members during that time. My printouts were inches thick on the two I concentrated on. Finally gave up. Was disgusted with all the donations, and who they were from. Would have taken me days and days to compile a complete list. Tried to give it to the Star reporter, but he thought it was all just fine. (and apparently he was treated well himself) He ended up being laid off or fired though. And then of course, there was land donated to the dad's club, or city, as a partial payoff. All done in the shining example of "charity." No, none of these contributions are a coincidence.

  4. I agree what kind of help or if any will be there for Dr. Ley's patients. I was a patient myself.

  5. What about the hundreds of patients who sought this doctor for the right reasons, to quit drugs. what option do these patients now have, experience horrible withdrawl or return to heroin?? those are the choices. what about the children of these former addicts who's parent(s) WILL not b able to maintain their job, for @ least 2 weeks.. There needs to b an emergency clinic opened for these patients.