IBJNews

Anderson loses out on Bright Automotive tech center

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Anderson-based Bright Automotive has decided to locate its technology center in Rochester Hills, Mich., causing the Madison County city that houses Bright's headquarters to lose out on 200 new jobs and an $11 million investment.

Michael Brylawski, Bright’s executive vice president of business development, told the Anderson Herald-Bulletin earlier this month that the company still remains committed to Indiana  even though it chose to locate the center elsewhere.

“This announcement has no implications on our current operations at the Flagship [Enterprise Center] and what we are doing there,” he said. “When we were in full operation in 2008, we always did our vehicle engineering in Michigan. What we’ve always done in Indiana is the power train because the battery and vehicle electrification expertise is in Indiana.”

Bright Automotive, which plans to produce hybrid vehicles, was hatched at the Rocky Mountain Institute in 2008 and moved to Anderson. It cut seven workers earlier this year, including its vice president of marketing, and was down to fewer than two dozen employees, according to a July story from the Herald-Bulletin. However, a $5 million investment from General Motors' new venture capital arm in August has given the company a boost.

The Web site MLive.com, a partnership among several Michigan newspapers, said the state granted Bright a tax credit of $4.3 million over five years to locate its tech center there.

Anderson Economic Development Director Linda Dawson told the Herald-Bulletin that the city and state offered competitive incentives.

The Indiana Economic Development Corp. reportedly offered about $4 million in incentives and the city $300,000 in tax abatements.

“Our community has invested considerable efforts and money over the last couple years in Bright, and we had high hopes that we would be able to retain the company’s operations in Anderson,” Dawson told the newspaper. “The city offered a very lucrative incentive package.”

Brylawski said Bright’s decision to locate the tech center in Michigan will have no bearing on where it locates its manufacturing plant, which it hopes could employ as many as 1,000 and produce 50,000 vehicles a year. The company is evaluating several sites to manufacture its hybrid vehicles, he said.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT