IBJNews

Anderson tests new pavement-recycling process

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Many sections of Raible Avenue in Anderson need a new coat of asphalt.

A quarter-mile section between Shady Lane and Van Buskirk Road is a good example. It's a cracked and rutted, teeth-chattering mess of a driving experience.

A new resurfacing process that's expected to be quicker, save the city money and more environmentally friendly will change all that.

Like every city around the state and the country, Anderson officials wanted to get the most for their road maintenance dollars.

In June, the city's Board of Public Works awarded a $338,155 contract to Gallagher Asphalt Corp., a suburban Chicago contractor that developed a "hot-in-place" method of pavement recycling, The Herald-Bulletin reported.

In a single pass, equipment that uses infrared technology heats and melts the asphalt, which is then broken up and removed, mixed with fresh oil and returned to the road surface. After that, it is smoothed and compacted with a roller. The process is called Re-HEAT, or Recycled Hot Emulsified Asphalt Treatment.

And Anderson is the first local government to use the new method in Indiana.

"The decision to implement the recycling process came about as city staff, recognizing the need to stretch roadway funding, researched innovative approaches to pavement preservation," Mayor Kevin Smith said in a news release.

In traditional "surface rehabilitation" the top two inches of asphalt are removed and replaced with an entirely new layer of material.

"Gallagher's asphalt recycling processes fit the needs of many of our roads and is an excellent way to get the absolute best value for every resurfacing dollar we spend," said City Engineer Mike Spyers.

On roads where Re-HEAT can't be used, Gallagher will use an older rehabilitation method called Heater Scarification, which has been used throughout the Midwest for more than 30 years.

The first paving priority this year was downtown, followed by roads leading to hospitals, schools, churches and then residential areas. Selections are made based on assessments by the Madison County Council of Governments and the city's own studies of high-use roads and those in bad shape.

In addition to the contract with Gallagher, the Board of Works approved a $121,447 contract with Pavement Solutions for surface treatment and paint, and an $11,988 contract with Shambaugh & Son for traffic signal pavement work.

All three contracts will be paid from the wheel tax fund — a $25 tax the Madison County Council rescinded earlier this year.

Spyers said the new process appears to be less expensive, but will be evaluated to determine how long lasting it will be.

"This may be the wave of the future," he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Pavement recycling
    I am a huge advocate of recycling asphalt or any pavements. I commend the City of Anderson for going the route of recycling. Infrared heating asphalt pavement recycling method definitely has its applications, however a small concern or comment - the road was described in the article as ..."It's a cracked and rutted, teeth-chattering mess of a driving experience." Generally when you have rutting you already have subgrade failure - if the rutting was bad then this may be the wrong application or recycling method. There are other asphalt reclamation processes that treat the entire pavement section i.e. asphalt and aggregate base section. Really please to see more communities experimenting and trying recycling or reclamation. Mark Behrens Geotechnical / Pavement engineer.
  • environmentally friendly? yeah, right ...
    How can continuing to use asphalt be considered environmentally friendly? What a oxymoron ...

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. RKW's comments read like a modern "Chicken Little". As a Raintree resident for many years, "Yes, I'm ready for this." Matter of fact, I welcome The Farm because it's a development that compliments our town, brings new and desirable shopping & dining closer (specialty grocer, upscale shops, micro brew pub, etc), offers upscale condos for empty nesters who want to stay in Zionsville, is being planned and constructed by local, well-reputed firms and, of course, provides desirable non property tax benefits. We all knew the Pittman's were going to develop their property sooner than later. That one of the Pittman's will continue to live on the property helps assure The Farm will be everything promised. This also sets a standard for other developers as to the quality of future developments - which should keep an ugly Walmart at bay for decades. As we've no meglomaniac mayor, I seriously doubt Zionsville would ever aspire to over-priced statues or subsidized retail rents. And we already have a very nice public theater, the Zionsville Performing Arts Center, that meets our cultural needs quite nicely.

  2. Do we add (or subtract) these from the bounty we recieve from RTWFL, Daylight Savings Time, corporate tax giveaways, and the crack job IEDC is doing?? Or is Mike going to blame these on Mitch?

  3. Who makes Tater Tots? They would be a good sponsor, because $3 Million for the alleged "Greatest Spectacle In Racing" is taters. Tiny, tiny taters. But at least they are making up something of the losses accumulated over the years in this dying sport. Buttock in seat is certainly not doing it, nor eyeball on TV, as evidenced by the lack of both.

  4. We loved lakehouse and think the Arbor Village would be a great location. It is less than 2 miles from over 1000 rooftops in the 225,000 to over 1 million range. Many people could use the great fishers trail system to bike or walk there. Just an idea Scotty -- but maybe something closer to 3 Wiseman would good. The only microbrew in area is Ram (boring)

  5. True, it's an ESPN production, but ESPN is just another name for ABC Sports, or what used to be ABC Sports since ABC Sports no longer exists as a name. ESPN=ABC Sports= ESPN. ESPN is, according to Forbes "the world's most valuable media property" worth $40 billion. Despite that, they fired 400 people this week.

ADVERTISEMENT