IBJNews

Angie’s List posts larger loss, but higher revenue

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis-based Angie’s List Inc. reported its second quarterly results as a public company late Thursday afternoon, disclosing that it lost nearly $13.5 million in the first three months of 2012 on revenue of $31.1 million.

The per-share loss in the first quarter was 24 cents. In the same quarter a year earlier, the company lost $9.6 million, or 34 cents per share.

Analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters had expected the provider of online consumer reviews to lose 25 cents per share.

Quarterly revenue increased 76 percent from a year earlier and paid members rose 81 percent, to 1.2 million.

The company reported marketing expenses in the latest quarter of $17.6 million, up from $11.1 million a year earlier.

Angie’s List is available in 175 U.S. markets. It entered 135 of those within the past three years, drving up expenses.

"As we continue to execute on our strategy, we plan to invest aggressively in our product, engineering and sales infrastructure to capitalize on our market opportunity," CEO Bill Oesterle said in a prepared statement.

The company, which provides reviews of plumbers, electricians and other service providers, hasn’t turned an annual profit since its founding 17 years ago.

Angie’s List staged its initial public offering in mid-November, raising $114 million. The company sold 8.8 million shares for $13 apiece. They stock traded as high as $18.75 on the opening day.

Shares closed Thursday at $13.88 each, down 8 cents on the day.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Who cares...
    ... where they get all their money? As long as they, and market analysts, can tell you with a straight face that they'll be profitable someday soon, why wouldn't anyone want to buy this stock? What? Are we supposed to concern ourselves with government corruption, or be concerned that future administrations could tell them to buy their own office space?
  • P Stands for Pump
    Nice try at pumping the stock there, P. "Once they get established"?!?!?! Going on 19 years in business and nothing but losses to show for it. How much longer until "they get established"?

    I do, however, agree with you on one thing, they are getting a boatload of tax dollars to keep their sinking ship afloat. Ask Mitch if that has anything to do with his former campaign finance chairman being a founding member / major shaeholder.
  • Here's the deal.
    Don't you guys get it? Sure, they are losing money now. But once they get established in all these markets, they will slash their expenses (mostly marketing) in half and put the whole thing on cruise control. Then, they will rake in the profits. On the downside, that might leave some empty office space at their campus, but on the upside for AL & its investors, the taxpayers are paying for their current expansions. Could there be a better time to buy this stock?
  • Model
    So if both revenue and losses are up, I guess they are using the tried and true business model of "we lose money on every unit, but we can make up for it with volume." Brilliant!!!
  • Business Model Broken
    Its called spending more than you make. This business will fail in time.
  • Games People Play
    Any relationship between Angie's List executives or board and the marketing company that is taking all thier IPO money?

    What about real estate leases and services agreements?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT