IBJNews

Angie’s List posts larger loss, but higher revenue

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis-based Angie’s List Inc. reported its second quarterly results as a public company late Thursday afternoon, disclosing that it lost nearly $13.5 million in the first three months of 2012 on revenue of $31.1 million.

The per-share loss in the first quarter was 24 cents. In the same quarter a year earlier, the company lost $9.6 million, or 34 cents per share.

Analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters had expected the provider of online consumer reviews to lose 25 cents per share.

Quarterly revenue increased 76 percent from a year earlier and paid members rose 81 percent, to 1.2 million.

The company reported marketing expenses in the latest quarter of $17.6 million, up from $11.1 million a year earlier.

Angie’s List is available in 175 U.S. markets. It entered 135 of those within the past three years, drving up expenses.

"As we continue to execute on our strategy, we plan to invest aggressively in our product, engineering and sales infrastructure to capitalize on our market opportunity," CEO Bill Oesterle said in a prepared statement.

The company, which provides reviews of plumbers, electricians and other service providers, hasn’t turned an annual profit since its founding 17 years ago.

Angie’s List staged its initial public offering in mid-November, raising $114 million. The company sold 8.8 million shares for $13 apiece. They stock traded as high as $18.75 on the opening day.

Shares closed Thursday at $13.88 each, down 8 cents on the day.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Who cares...
    ... where they get all their money? As long as they, and market analysts, can tell you with a straight face that they'll be profitable someday soon, why wouldn't anyone want to buy this stock? What? Are we supposed to concern ourselves with government corruption, or be concerned that future administrations could tell them to buy their own office space?
  • P Stands for Pump
    Nice try at pumping the stock there, P. "Once they get established"?!?!?! Going on 19 years in business and nothing but losses to show for it. How much longer until "they get established"?

    I do, however, agree with you on one thing, they are getting a boatload of tax dollars to keep their sinking ship afloat. Ask Mitch if that has anything to do with his former campaign finance chairman being a founding member / major shaeholder.
  • Here's the deal.
    Don't you guys get it? Sure, they are losing money now. But once they get established in all these markets, they will slash their expenses (mostly marketing) in half and put the whole thing on cruise control. Then, they will rake in the profits. On the downside, that might leave some empty office space at their campus, but on the upside for AL & its investors, the taxpayers are paying for their current expansions. Could there be a better time to buy this stock?
  • Model
    So if both revenue and losses are up, I guess they are using the tried and true business model of "we lose money on every unit, but we can make up for it with volume." Brilliant!!!
  • Business Model Broken
    Its called spending more than you make. This business will fail in time.
  • Games People Play
    Any relationship between Angie's List executives or board and the marketing company that is taking all thier IPO money?

    What about real estate leases and services agreements?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Really, taking someone managing the regulation of Alcohol and making himthe President of an IVY Tech regional campus. Does he have an education background?

  2. Jan, great rant. Now how about you review the report and offer rebuttal of the memo. This might be more conducive to civil discourse than a wild rant with no supporting facts. Perhaps some links to support your assertions would be helpful

  3. I've lived in Indianapolis my whole and been to the track 3 times. Once for a Brickyard, once last year on a practice day for Indy 500, and once when I was a high school student to pick up trash for community service. In the past 11 years, I would say while the IMS is a great venue, there are some upgrades that would show that it's changing with the times, just like the city is. First, take out the bleachers and put in individual seats. Kentucky Motor Speedway has individual seats and they look cool. Fix up the restrooms. Add wi-fi. Like others have suggested, look at bringing in concerts leading up to events. Don't just stick with the country music genre. Pop music would work well too I believe. This will attract more young celebrities to the Indy 500 like the kind that go to the Kentucky Derby. Work with Indy Go to increase the frequency of the bus route to the track during high end events. That way people have other options than worrying about where to park and paying for parking. Then after all of this, look at getting night lights. I think the aforementioned strategies are more necessary than night racing at this point in time.

  4. Talking about congestion ANYWHERE in Indianapolis is absolutely laughable. Sure you may have to wait in 5 minutes of traffic to travel down BR avenue during *peak* times. But that is absolutely nothing compared to actual big cities. Indy is way too suburban to have actual congestion problems. So please, never bring up "congestion" as an excuse to avoid development in Indianapolis. If anything, we could use a little more.

  5. Oh wait. Never mind.

ADVERTISEMENT