IBJNews

Angie’s List posts larger loss, but higher revenue

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis-based Angie’s List Inc. reported its second quarterly results as a public company late Thursday afternoon, disclosing that it lost nearly $13.5 million in the first three months of 2012 on revenue of $31.1 million.

The per-share loss in the first quarter was 24 cents. In the same quarter a year earlier, the company lost $9.6 million, or 34 cents per share.

Analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters had expected the provider of online consumer reviews to lose 25 cents per share.

Quarterly revenue increased 76 percent from a year earlier and paid members rose 81 percent, to 1.2 million.

The company reported marketing expenses in the latest quarter of $17.6 million, up from $11.1 million a year earlier.

Angie’s List is available in 175 U.S. markets. It entered 135 of those within the past three years, drving up expenses.

"As we continue to execute on our strategy, we plan to invest aggressively in our product, engineering and sales infrastructure to capitalize on our market opportunity," CEO Bill Oesterle said in a prepared statement.

The company, which provides reviews of plumbers, electricians and other service providers, hasn’t turned an annual profit since its founding 17 years ago.

Angie’s List staged its initial public offering in mid-November, raising $114 million. The company sold 8.8 million shares for $13 apiece. They stock traded as high as $18.75 on the opening day.

Shares closed Thursday at $13.88 each, down 8 cents on the day.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Who cares...
    ... where they get all their money? As long as they, and market analysts, can tell you with a straight face that they'll be profitable someday soon, why wouldn't anyone want to buy this stock? What? Are we supposed to concern ourselves with government corruption, or be concerned that future administrations could tell them to buy their own office space?
  • P Stands for Pump
    Nice try at pumping the stock there, P. "Once they get established"?!?!?! Going on 19 years in business and nothing but losses to show for it. How much longer until "they get established"?

    I do, however, agree with you on one thing, they are getting a boatload of tax dollars to keep their sinking ship afloat. Ask Mitch if that has anything to do with his former campaign finance chairman being a founding member / major shaeholder.
  • Here's the deal.
    Don't you guys get it? Sure, they are losing money now. But once they get established in all these markets, they will slash their expenses (mostly marketing) in half and put the whole thing on cruise control. Then, they will rake in the profits. On the downside, that might leave some empty office space at their campus, but on the upside for AL & its investors, the taxpayers are paying for their current expansions. Could there be a better time to buy this stock?
  • Model
    So if both revenue and losses are up, I guess they are using the tried and true business model of "we lose money on every unit, but we can make up for it with volume." Brilliant!!!
  • Business Model Broken
    Its called spending more than you make. This business will fail in time.
  • Games People Play
    Any relationship between Angie's List executives or board and the marketing company that is taking all thier IPO money?

    What about real estate leases and services agreements?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT