IBJNews

Angie's List falls below offer price, adding to woes of new IPOs

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Angie’s List Inc. fell 9.2 percent on Tuesday, dropping below its initial public offering price for the first time and joining a crop of Internet companies that have lost value since their IPOs this year.

Indianapolis-based Angie’s List, a company that rates plumbers, electricians and other service providers, fell $1.20, to close at $11.80 per share, dropping for the fourth straight day. The company went public Nov.  17 and closed the day at $16.26 per share. The stock has fallen in six out of seven trading days since its debut.

It continued to fall on Wednesday, falling 30 cents by noon, despite a big overall rise in the market.

Groupon Inc. has tumbled 20 percent since its offering on Nov. 3, while Pandora Media Inc. has lost more than a third of its value since its IPO in June.

HomeAway Inc., which went public two weeks after Pandora, has fallen 5.3 percent. Russia’s Yandex NV and China-based Renren Inc., two IPOs from May, also have dropped. All are now below their offering prices.

“It seems that there is a virus running through the sector, with Groupon being the carrier,” said David Menlow, president of Millburn, N.J.-based IPOfinancial.com, a site that tracks stock offerings. “The question now is if the big valuation given to these companies is unwarranted.”

The broader market also has lost ground since mid-year, as the European debt crisis and high U.S. unemployment push down consumer sentiment to levels previously reached during recessions. Still, IPOs have performed worse. Of this year’s biggest U.S. Internet debuts, only LinkedIn Corp., the top professional-networking site, has stayed above its IPO price.

The Bloomberg IPO Index, which measures the performance of stocks during their first publicly traded year, has dropped 26 percent in 2011, compared with a 5-percent decline in the Standard & Poor’s 500 index.

Even as stocks slide, Facebook Inc. is considering filing for an IPO by the end of this year, according to a person familiar with the matter. It would value the social-networking site at more than $100 billion, the person said. That would be twice as high as its valuation in January, when the company announced a $1.5 billion investment from Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and other backers.

Angie's IPO price of $13 valued the company at more than $900 million, or about 11 times sales in the 12 months through September. That compared with Google Inc., which traded at about 5.4 times trailing 12-month sales. Groupon, which like Google was named as a competitor in Angie’s List’s filing, traded at about 12 times sales in the same period.

Groupon, the largest daily-deal site, ended a five-day slide, rising 77 cents to $16.01 per share Tuesday. The Chicago-based company, which had an IPO price of $20, has dropped 39 percent from its high on Nov. 18. It’s been hurt by concern that profit margins will be squeezed by surging marketing costs and rising competition.


 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • It Doesn't Matter Now
    The insiders have already cashed in to the tune of millions of dollars when they sold their worthless stock for $18 a share. Now they can sit back, collect their eggregious salaries, and continue to do what they have been doing for 16+ years, lose other people's money.

    They could not care less what the stock price does going forward. Anything they get for the shares their retained will just be gravy as they slowly sell them off over the next few years for "estate and tax planning" purposes.
  • Doubter
    I KNEW I should have shorted that sucker when it hit the market!! Good example of when a Harvard MBA thesis meets reality. Watch this one go the way of Irwin Bank!! Down, down, . . .>>>>
  • FYI
    Another Angie's List story. Maybe they are keeping you informed of this stuff, maybe not.
  • Tell Me Why
    The reason you would buy it is the same reason I bought Amazon stock (AMZN) when they went public, with 0 earnings..... because it is an investment, with risks, in the future potential of the company and their future P/E ratio.
  • hello?
    Paul....Well said! I am still baffled by their decision to create an offering.
  • Price to Sales?
    Whatever happened to using the measure of Price to Earnings (P/E Ratio)?

    "Angie's IPO price of $13 valued the company at more than $900 million, or about 11 times sales in the 12 months through September."

    I think a P/E ratio of 11 to 1 would be pretty darn good, but the E stands for earnings, as in net profit, not for sales, which don't even match expenses. Thus, Angie's P/E ratio would be negative. Tell me again why I want to buy stock in a company that has never turned a profit and can't even realistically project one?

    “The question now is if the big valuation given to these companies is unwarranted.”

    You don't say.

    • day traders
      mark cuban was right about the day traders
    • No surprise here
      I about fell out of my chair when AngiesList announced they were filing for public listing. Just because you have a few employees doesn't mean you're a good candidate for public trading, or that your company is worth jack. Early shareholders just wanted to see if they could become overnight billionaires.

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

      2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

      3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

      4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

      5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

      ADVERTISEMENT