IBJNews

Angie's List posts smaller loss on higher revenue

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis-based Angie’s List Inc. reported its first results as a public company late Wednesday afternoon, disclosing that it lost $5.9 million in the fourth quarter on revenue of $27.4 million.

The per-share loss was 14 cents. In the same quarter a year earlier, the company lost $8.2 million, or 30 cents per share.

Analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters had expected the provider of online consumer reviews to post a loss of 11 cents per share for the quarter ended Dec. 31.

Quarterly revenue increased 53 percent.

Total paid memberships exceeded 1 million, a 78-percent year-over-year increase.

“Evidence of our progress can be seen in our 2011 results,” Angie's List CEO Bill Oesterle said in a prepared statement. “The business and the model continued on their long path of scale, consistency and predictability."

For the entire year, the company lost $49 million. That compared to a loss of $27 million in 2010.

Angie’s List is available in 175 U.S. markets. It entered 135 of those within the past three years, driving up expenses.

Annual revenue in 2011 climbed 53 percent, to $90 million.

The company, which provides reviews of plumbers, electricians and other service providers, hasn’t turned an annual profit since it was founded 17 years ago.

Angie’s List went public in mid-November after raising $114 million in an initial public offering. The company sold 8.8 million shares for $13 apiece, and shares quickly surged to as high as $18.75 in its trading debut.

Shares closed on Wednesday at $14.46 each, down 47 cents from their opening price.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT