IBJNews

Angie's List shares fall as eBay plans competing model

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis-based Angie’s List's stock continued to tumble Thursday morning after an analyst downgraded the stock following a report that Internet giant eBay will test its own consumer-reviews site in the United Kingdom.

Shares in Angie's List fell as much as 12 percent before rising slightly. They traded at $23.92 late in the morning, down nearly 10 percent. They closed the day at $23.76, down 10.3 percent from the previous day's close.

Even though the company reported record second-quarter revenue Wednesday, Raymond James lowered its Angie's List outlook to "outperform" from "strong buy."

Meanwhile, Barrington Research said it would maintain its “market perform” rating “because we worry that too much optimism is priced in the stock,” which had been up 120 percent year-to-date through Wednesday.

Barrington also cited uncertainty around a recent change in chief financial officers. Analyst Jeff Houston said he still believes Angie’s business model is sound, and cited a recent change to sales force compensation favorable to the company.

Angie's List on Wednesday said revenue rose to $59.2 million in the quarter ended June 30, a rise of  62 percent over the second quarter of 2012.

The company continued to lose money but the losses are getting smaller. The company lost $14.3 million, or 25 cents per share, compared to a loss of $23.4 million, or 41 cents per share, for the same quarter a year earlier.

The loss of 25 cents a share was in line with a consensus of 12 analysts who follow the publisher of consumer reviews for services such as plumbers and roofers.

Angie's List shares closed Wednesday at $26.50 per share, down 1.3 percent. They fell another 5.7 percent after hours, to $25 per share.

Earlier Wednesday, TechCrunch.com reported that Internet giant eBay was testing a consumer ratings and review service "similar to Angie's List" in the UK known as eBayHire. EBay has not announced a similar pilot in the United States, at least "not yet," the industry trade site said.

Despite spending millions of dollars on national marketing, Angie's List has been facing growing competition in its niche by firms such as Yelp, Thumbtack and HomeAdvisor.  Angie’s List, which arguably has more consumer reviews and leading-edge service scheduling via its website, has been perennially unprofitable since its founding in the 1990s. Much of its cash flow has gone to establishing a presence in new cities.

Nationwide, Angie's List marketing expenses grew just 1 percent in the second quarter, to $28 million.
 
The company reported new highs for paid membership, with nearly 2.2 million at the end of the quarter, an increase of 51 percent from a year earlier. Participating service providers rose 42 percent, to 42,452.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Angie Scam
    I continue to view Angie's List as nothing more than a scam. Vendors are required to pay big bucks to maintain their first page positions when clients seek guidance for a vendor, and Angie continues to claim "You cannot pay to be on Angie's List". Well, perhaps Angie has a different definition for "payola" than average folks understand.
  • Angie Must Add Real Value...
    Angie's List has some major competition in the SoMoLo(SOcial MObility LOcation)space — Yelp, eBay and Google. Angie's List has easier steps to take to become dominant in the local recommendation space. Expand the Super Service Award — make it a really big deal. Have an awards ceremony. Have a convention that enthuses members and vendors alike, while growing the brand. Add relevant functionality to Angie's List — create a real local recommendation engine for members and vendors. These are just some of the things Angie's List must do to become the de facto standard in the local recommendation space. If it can do half of these things, it will be far superior to anything Yelp or even Google can offer. Angie's List memberships have grown 60% while revenue rose 68% to $52 million. The company lost almost $8 million, mostly due to high advertising costs to grow the brand — but overall revenue was up 78%. Angie's List — right now — is the stock to beat in local recommendation. Read more here - http://goo.gl/el7IB3
  • It's midnight, Babe. Pumpkin time.
    Hey, Angie, it's getting close to midnight and still nobody wants to dance with you. Matter of fact, it sounds like the bell has already rung and you're the wallflower. Wonder when the angel money spigot gets turned off. Nice try. Next time, focus a little more on the business model.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT