IBJNews

Chief financial officer Millard leaving Angie's List

IBJ Staff
March 15, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Robert Millard, chief financial officer at Angie’s List Inc. for less than two years, will step down at the quarter’s end, the Indianapolis-based company announced Thursday.

Millard is at least the third CFO to depart the online-consumer-review company since July 2008. No reason was given for his exit.

“Bob has made significant contributions to Angie’s List through our successful initial public offering and transition to becoming a public company, and in building a strong finance team,” CEO Bill Oesterle said in a prepared statement. “As the rapid evolution and growth of our business continues, we have determined the time is right to commence a search for Bob’s successor. We appreciate Bob’s efforts throughout this transition and wish him the best of luck in future endeavors.”

Millard will remain as an employee through June 28, the company said. Angie’s List Controller Charles Hundt will become interim CFO while a permanent replacement is sought.

Millard joined Angie’s List in May 2011 when it was still privately held.

Thomas Harvey held the CFO's post from 2008 to 2010, and Keith Midkiff was CFO from 2004 to 2008.

Before Angie's List, Millard had been CFO at FinishMaster Inc., an Indianapolis-based automotive paints distributor. FinishMaster was owned by LDI Ltd., an Indianapolis holding company, before its sale to Uni-Select Inc. in January 2011.

Prior to that, Millard was CFO at Personnel Management Inc., a public company in Greenwood that was sold to a private equity firm.

"My time with Angie's List has been very rewarding and I am proud of what we have accomplished,” Millard said in a prepared statement. “I have great confidence in the team I have put in place and look forward to assisting Bill and the board in this transition."

Angie's List stock was down 28 cents, or 1.3 percent, in late-morning trading, to $19.57 a share.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT