Answers on $526M in tax mistakes expected in December

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Auditors reviewing $526 million in tax errors made by Indiana's tax collection agency said Monday they will investigate whether state employees are knowledgeable enough to track tax collections and whether the state has adequate internal controls to guard against future errors.

Auditors for the accounting firm Deloitte briefed members of the State Budget Committee on their 27-page risk assessment and audit plan. The auditors said they expect to begin their audit this week and expect to report findings to the budget panel in December.

In December, the Revenue Department discovered it had lost track of $320 million in corporate tax collections. Four months later, the state also discovered it had not paid $206 million in local income taxes owed to counties.

The errors led Gov. Mitch Daniels to force out three top officials in the department, and the discovery of the second error spurred Republicans to acquiesce to Democrats, who had sought an independent audit.

Deloitte employees Kathi Schwerdtfeger and Bari Faudree walked lawmakers through the plan they compiled following interviews with state workers at the Revenue Department, State Budget Agency, Department of Local Government and Finance, and the treasurer's and auditor's offices.

The state has become a national model, they said, for processing individual returns more quickly and efficiently, but may have been deficient in hiring staff with enough expertise to track a tax check through the entire processing system. There also may be problems with internal controls at the tax department caused in part by high turnover.

Internal controls and reviews, designed to catch errors immediately and avert problems like those which led to the two major errors, "appear to have been a lower priority" than the tax return processing, Deloitte wrote in its report. The management of the department's IT and tax collection areas "may not have been as rigorous in detecting errors within the financial accounting systems."

But Schwerdtfeger and Faudree were careful to note these are areas to investigate, and are not necessarily problems.

State budget director Adam Horst said he was happy that answers could come by the end of the year.

"We said 'Your goal here is as fast as you can get it done, but we said it has to be independent and it has to be right,'" he said.

Horst added that some areas the group will review, including employee proficiency, are not necessarily specific problems at the revenue department but could be part of general problems found in any government agency.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1