Answers on $526M in tax mistakes expected in December

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Auditors reviewing $526 million in tax errors made by Indiana's tax collection agency said Monday they will investigate whether state employees are knowledgeable enough to track tax collections and whether the state has adequate internal controls to guard against future errors.

Auditors for the accounting firm Deloitte briefed members of the State Budget Committee on their 27-page risk assessment and audit plan. The auditors said they expect to begin their audit this week and expect to report findings to the budget panel in December.

In December, the Revenue Department discovered it had lost track of $320 million in corporate tax collections. Four months later, the state also discovered it had not paid $206 million in local income taxes owed to counties.

The errors led Gov. Mitch Daniels to force out three top officials in the department, and the discovery of the second error spurred Republicans to acquiesce to Democrats, who had sought an independent audit.

Deloitte employees Kathi Schwerdtfeger and Bari Faudree walked lawmakers through the plan they compiled following interviews with state workers at the Revenue Department, State Budget Agency, Department of Local Government and Finance, and the treasurer's and auditor's offices.

The state has become a national model, they said, for processing individual returns more quickly and efficiently, but may have been deficient in hiring staff with enough expertise to track a tax check through the entire processing system. There also may be problems with internal controls at the tax department caused in part by high turnover.

Internal controls and reviews, designed to catch errors immediately and avert problems like those which led to the two major errors, "appear to have been a lower priority" than the tax return processing, Deloitte wrote in its report. The management of the department's IT and tax collection areas "may not have been as rigorous in detecting errors within the financial accounting systems."

But Schwerdtfeger and Faudree were careful to note these are areas to investigate, and are not necessarily problems.

State budget director Adam Horst said he was happy that answers could come by the end of the year.

"We said 'Your goal here is as fast as you can get it done, but we said it has to be independent and it has to be right,'" he said.

Horst added that some areas the group will review, including employee proficiency, are not necessarily specific problems at the revenue department but could be part of general problems found in any government agency.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If what you stated is true, then this article is entirely inaccurate. "State sells bonds" is same as "State borrows money". Supposedly the company will "pay for them". But since we are paying the company, we are still paying for this road with borrowed money, even though the state has $2 billion in the bank.

  2. Andrew hit the nail on the head. AMTRAK provides terrible service and that is why the state has found a contractor to improve the service. More trips, on-time performance, better times, cleanliness and adequate or better restrooms. WI-FI and food service will also be provided. Transit from outlying areas will also be provided. I wouldn't take it the way it is but with the above services and marketing of the service,ridership will improve and more folks will explore Indy and may even want to move here.

  3. They could take the property using eminent domain and save money by not paying the church or building a soccer field and a new driveway. Ctrwd has monthly meetings open to all customers of the district. The meetings are listed and if the customers really cared that much they would show. Ctrwd works hard in every way they can to make sure the customer is put first. Overflows damage the surrounding environment and cost a lot of money every year. There have been many upgrades done through the years to help not send flow to Carmel. Even with the upgrades ctrwd cannot always keep up. I understand how a storage tank could be an eye sore, but has anyone thought to look at other lift stations or storage tanks. Most lift stations are right in the middle of neighborhoods. Some close to schools and soccer fields, and some right in back yards, or at least next to a back yard. We all have to work together to come up with a proper solution. The proposed solution by ctrwd is the best one offered so far.

  4. Fox has comments from several people that seem to have some inside information. I would refer to their website. Changed my whole opionion of this story.

  5. This place is great! I'm piggy backing and saying the Cobb salad is great. But the ribs are awesome. $6.49 for ribs and 2 sides?! They're delicious. If you work downtown, head over there.