IBJNews

Anthem: Global payments coming back

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield’s vision for accountable care organizations foresees doctors and hospitals shifting to global capitation payments and employers getting bigger discounts if they allow their workers access only to health care providers in a specific organization.

Those are some of the details outlined by Todd Rankin, Anthem’s senior network development manager, in an April 13 slide presentation before the Indianapolis Association of Health Underwriters.

Anthem, a subsidiary of Indianapolis-based WellPoint Inc., is the dominant health insurer in Indiana, so its direction on accountable care organizations, or ACOs, will carry significant sway here. The ACO concept got a big boost from the 2010 health reform bill, which calls for the federal Medicare program to contract with hospitals and doctors that form such organizations. But private insurers like Anthem are eager to follow suit as well.

“No one seems to know exactly what an ACO is, but everybody wants one,” Rankin said in his presentation. He added, “We can’t continue with the status quo.”

The status quo is that health plans pay doctors and hospitals pre-negotiated fees for each service they perform. This fee-for-service system is easy to administer, but has been criticized for encouraging doctors to drive up their volume of services—whether it helps patients or not.

With health insurance premiums having doubled in the past decade and government budgets groaning under health care costs, the accountable care concept has emerged as the next great thing to rein in costs.

The idea is that doctors and hospitals would band together in an ACO to take on responsibility for the overall health of a specific population of patients. They would then be paid in ways that encourage them to keep those patients healthy, and not in need of major medical care.

Those methods of payment are the tricky part. Medicare proposed a system where the doctors and hospitals would get a cut of any savings they achieved by keeping patients healthy. It also is rolling out a system of bundled payments—for instance, making only one payment for a complex surgery—that would leave it to the hospitals and doctors to fight over who gets what cut.

Anthem is open to those concepts too, Rankin said. But the two models he presented clearly call for moving providers toward global capitation payments over the course of five-year contracts.

Such a system would negotiate a payment per patient for each year, which would attempt to price in differences for patients of differing health levels. If doctors and hospitals spent less than the negotiated amounts taking care of their assigned patients during the year, they would keep the difference. If they spent more, they would have to eat the losses.

One of Anthem’s models starts out with fee-for-service payments and one starts with global capitation payments with only partial risk. But by year four of both models, the health care providers would assume the full risk of the global capitation system.

If all this sounds familiar, that’s because the accountable care organization concept is nearly identical to the health maintenance organizations, or HMOs, that were popular in the early to mid-1990s. A key difference is that ACOs call for rewarding doctors and hospitals for tracking and scoring well on quality measures.

An ACO, Rankin noted, has been called by some as an “HMO in drag.” He said Anthem would look for health care providers who have the information technology systems that can easily track and report on how many patients have been screened for breast or colon cancers, for example, or for key indicators of chronic diseases, such as blood sugar and cholesterol levels.

“From a provider perspective, there’s a lot of concern. If there’s a lot of leakage [patients switching to doctors outside the ACO], how are they going to be able to control and manage the health of the population?” Rankin admitted. He added, “They’re also fearful about, 'What’s this going to mean for our reimbursement?'”

Anthem has initiated no ACOs in Indiana, although it has been in preliminary discussions with the state’s major hospital systems, Rankin said. WellPoint operates three ACOs in California and one in New Hampshire.

In California, WellPoint is offering employers access to ACOs on two pricing models. The first, like the HMOs of old, would cover the cost of an employees’ care only with doctors or hospitals that are part of a specific ACO. If the employee, or his or her family members, went to doctors outside the ACO, they would pay out of pocket.

For a higher price, employers could buy a plan that functions more like a PPO, or preferred provider organization. In those plans, out-of-pocket costs are cheapest when an employee sees a doctor in the ACO. But if he or she goes to a doctor outside the network, WellPoint will still pay a chunk of the cost.

“There’s a lot of unknowns and a lot of hesitation,” Rankin said. But, he added, "We’re looking to be in it for the long haul.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT