IBJNews

Apartments near downtown canal slated for rehab

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A local real estate veteran who had planned to retire has instead jumped back into the game with the purchase of two vacant downtown properties he plans to convert to market-rate apartments.

John Watson, who was a partner with Carl Van Rooy in Van Rooy Properties Group from 1986 to 2006, formed Core Redevelopment Inc. at the end of August and on Sept. 1 purchased two buildings at Senate and North streets that will house 71 one-bedroom apartments and six studio apartments.

The buildings on the southeast and southwest corners of Senate and North and about a block east of the canal were built in 1900 and 1903 as the Avondale and Deauville apartments. They were rehabbed in 1976 as low-income housing and have been vacant since last November.

They had been owned since 2004 by a local partnership. Tenants in the buildings had been eligible for housing assistance payments through a program of the federal government. When the property fell out of compliance with that program a few years ago, occupancy took a nosedive and the entity that owned the building fell behind on its mortgage with Wells Fargo Bank.

Watson bought the buildings for a little more than $1 million—about half the mortgage balance—and plans to spend another $1 million rehabbing the units. Watson said moderating prices caused him to jump back into real estate. “I was going to retire and go off in the sunset,” Watson said. “When I was stepping away, people were paying crazy prices. But then the market changed.”

The Senate Avenue apartments, which average about 650 square feet each, will rent for between $600 and $650 a month, Watson said. The first units should be ready for tenants by Dec. 1.

Amy Burmeister, a multi-family housing specialist with the local office of CB Richard Ellis who represented Watson in the transaction, said rent growth is driving interest in downtown apartment ownership.

Downtown rents have grown 6.7 percent in the last two years compared with 1 to 2 percent in other parts of the city, she said.

The out-of-town owners of the Richelieu townhomes and flats, a 62-unit, two-building property at the northwest corner of North and East streets, are hoping the growth in rent will help attract a buyer for their property. Burmeister will list the Richelieu, which is fully occupied, later this week for $4.95 million. At $80,000 a unit, it isn’t quite the bargain Watson got on the Senate Avenue buildings, but the units are bigger— at between 950 and 1,000 square feet—and the rents average more than $900 a month.

Burmeister attributed the growth in downtown rents to the limited supply of downtown apartments and the fact young professionals these days are less likely to take the plunge and buy a condo. She said downtown is especially attractive to college students and recent graduates. Watson agreed, noting that the Senate Avenue buildings are only blocks away from the IU School of Informatics. Parking with the buildings is in short supply, but he thinks their price and proximity to IUPUI will be attractive to student renters.

Executives at Flaherty & Collins, the developer of the Cosmopolitan on the Canal project just south of Watson’s buildings, think Watson’s project will help the neighborhood without competing directly for tenants. “We’re very happy to see John Watson buy the buildings and redevelop them. It’s a significant improvement to the neighborhood to say the least,” said Jim Crossin, vice president of development for Flaherty & Collins.

The Cosmopolitan will be ready for tenants by the end of the year. Its 218 one- and two-bedroom units will start at about $1,000 a month. At that higher price point, Flaherty & Collins expects the primary demographic for the complex to be young professionals, Crossin said.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • i need less apt 650 or 750 month 2 bed and 2 bath i am deaf is my son near school in sunrise

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT