IBJNews

Arcadia adds Goldsmith to board, seeks $11M in offering

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Arcadia Resources Inc. has appointed former Indianapolis Mayor Steve Goldsmith to its board of directors, the locally based health care company announced Monday morning.

Goldsmith, who served as mayor from 1992 to 2000, is a professor in the American Government Program at Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government. He also is the chairman of the Corporation for National and Community Service, a major grant maker that supports national and community services programs.

Goldsmith will replace Tres Lund, a major Arcadia shareholder who resigned from the board after serving on it since 2007. 

In addition Monday morning, Arcadia said it plans to sell nearly 16 million shares of stock in a registered direct offering that will raise $11.1 million.

Arcadia, which operates health care staffing businesses and a pharmaceutical management service, has commitments to sell the shares to institutional investors, which it did not name in its announcement. The company needed more cash, as its reserves had dwindled to $517,000 at the end of the second quarter, down from $2.4 million a year earlier.

The investors will pay 70 cents for each unit, which consists of one share of common stock as well as a warrant to purchase 0.45 shares as early as six months from now. The warrants are exercisable at a price of 95 cents per share.

Arcadia’s stock price closed Friday at 75 cents per share. The value of the stock has tripled in the last year as Arcadia’s losses have narrowed. However, the company’s share price has fallen 35 percent from its high set in mid-September.

The new shares offered, which totaled 15,857,141, represent 9.8 percent of Arcadia’s total shares outstanding.

And the company could sell even more shares. According to a prospectus Arcadia filed Friday with the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission, it may “from time to time” sell new shares up to a limit of 20 million.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT