IBJNews

Area home-construction permit filings flatten out

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Permit filings for home construction in central Indiana were flat in May—really flat.

Homebuilders filed 530 single-family building permits in the nine-county metro area in May, the Builders Association of Greater Indianapolis said Tuesday. That’s exactly the same number of permits that were filed in May 2013.

Filings had shown small year-over-year increases the previous three months after falling 1 percent in January.

Hamilton County led the area with 178 permits filed in May, a 5-percent drop from May 2013. Marion County saw 78 filings, up 4 percent.

Johnson County saw a 16-percent decrease, with 58 filings. Permits were up 48 percent in Hancock County, to 46.

 Filings were down 7 percent in Hendricks County, to 84, and flat in Boone County, at 49.

Through the first five months of the year, 2,189 permits have been filed in central Indiana, an increase of 3 percent over the same period of 2013.

Local construction numbers were better than national figures.

The pace of U.S home construction slipped in May with many Americans still struggling to afford new houses.

Builders started work at a seasonally adjusted annual rate on 1.01 million homes last month, the Commerce Department said Tuesday. That was down 6.5 percent, from 1.07 million, in April.

Construction firms began work on fewer single-family houses, condominiums and apartments nationally last month.

Home construction has struggled to gain much traction this year, limiting its ability to contribute as much to broader economic growth as it has in the past. Many would-be buyers face higher mortgage rates than at this time last year, while builders are selling fewer new homes but charging more for them.

That has reduced the number of possible buyers and the number of construction jobs. Builders employ 1.49 million fewer workers than they did at the start of the Great Recession in December 2007, a loss of roughly 20 percent.

In May, construction tailed off in the Northeast, Midwest and West. Only the South experienced greater building activity in May.

Housing starts have risen 9.4 percent during the past 12 months. But apartments account for most of the gains, suggesting that more Americans will be renting instead of owning homes.

The growth in apartment buildings points to an economy in which more Americans are renting, rather than buying homes. Following the housing bust and recession, Americans have had to deal with relatively flat wages and job insecurity, both obstacles to saving for a down payment. The home ownership rate was 64.8 percent at the start of the year, down from a peak of 69.2 percent in 2004.

Applications for building permits, a gauge of future activity, fell 6.4 percent in May to an annual rate of 991,000.

Now that the spring and summer buying season is in full swing, homebuilding appears to be struggling.

Builder confidence has improved slightly but remains pessimistic.

The National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo builder sentiment index rose to 49 in June, up from 45 in May. A reading below 50 indicates that builders consider the conditions for new construction to be poor. The index had been above 50 from June through January.

Sales of new homes rose 6.4 percent in April to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 433,000, according to a separate Commerce Department report. That comes after sales declined 6.9 percent in March to an annual pace of 407,000, while buying slipped 4.4 percent in February.

Median prices on new homes are $275,800, a 10-percent increase since the beginning of 2013.

All of this comes amid a broader real estate slowdown after significant sales and price gains in the first half of 2013. Both prices and borrowing costs are higher.

Average rates on a 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage are at 4.2 percent, up from a low of 3.93 percent during the past year, according to Freddie Mac.


 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT