IBJNews

Area home-sale agreements rise for 19th straight month

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Home-sale agreements in the nine-county Indianapolis area jumped 14.2 percent in November, marking the 19th straight month the number of pending sales has increased.

Overall, home-sale agreements are up 16.9 percent through November compared with the same period in 2011, Indianapolis-based real estate agency F.C. Tucker Co. Inc. said Monday morning.

Purchase agreements for existing homes totaled 1,708 in November, 213 more than reported in November 2011.

Every county in the area except Johnson reported an increase, F.C. Tucker said.

Home-sale agreements in Marion County were up 8.1 percent in November, from 663 to 717. Hamilton County sales rose less than 1 percent, from 323 to 325, but are up 21 percent for the year.

Pending sales in Hendricks County rose 64.2 percent during the month, from 106 to 174, and were up 55.7 percent in Madison County, from 70 to 109.

Average sale prices for the year have risen 2.1 percent in the overall area, to $155,742. Prices are up 3.5 percent in Marion County, to $119,159.

Counties that recorded a decline in average sale price last month were Hamilton, down 3.2 percent, to $240,828, and Hancock, down 0.1 percent, to $139,183.

Prices for the most part are increasing due to a falling inventory of available homes. There were 11,096 existing homes on the market in November, a drop from 13,423 in November 2011.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Thanks Mitch
    Good to know that right to work for less and daylight savings time benefits are finally kicking in.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT