Area home sales continue downward spiral

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Home-sale agreements in the nine-county central Indiana region dropped 17.5 percent in November compared to the same month a year ago, according to a report released Monday morning by F.C. Tucker Co.

Pending home sales dropped last month to 1,222, down from 1,481 in November 2009, the Indianapolis-based real estate company said.

The decline marked the seventh straight month that year-over-year home sales have slumped in central Indiana following three straight months of improving sales activity spurred by generous federal tax credits.

Pending sales were down 40 percent in October, 23 percent in September, 23 percent in August, 27 percent in July, 30 percent in June, and 32 percent in May.

Pending home sales account for sales agreements, not sales that have closed.

Year-to-date, sales are off 10.1 percent from the same period in 2009, the report said.

In Marion County, November sales agreements fell 18.2 percent compared with the previous year, from 691 to 565.

Pending sales dropped 21.2 percent in Hamilton County, from 292 to 230, and 6.2 percent in Hendricks County, from 113 to 106. Only one area county, Hancock, saw an increase in sales, from 53 to 56.

One bright spot in the residential market has been average sale prices. Through November, the average sale price of a home sold in central Indiana has been $150,130, up 8.2 percent from the same 11-month period of 2009, the report said.

Active listings have increased 1.6 percent in the area, from 14,912 to 15,151.


  • Joe is right... though there is a twist.
    Joe Shoemaker is absolutely right. On the face of it, "Average Price" (or even "median price) does not refer to a specific property selling for more or less than a previous period. In fact, there really is no way to be certain that "House A" varies in price at all unless that specific home is sold at various times. No two properties are the same.

    I might mention that there is one slight twist to this: Viewing Sales Prices together with Price Per Square Foot prices.

    One might argue that, if the price per square foot average (or median) stays the same but the average (or median) sales price increases, the public is buying more expensive homes. But there are too many ways to interpret such data to say that with conviction. Fortunately, good agents have a sense of the markets in which they specialize to know what is actually happening.

    For another statistical view of November, I will shamelessly add our monthly report (now in its sixth year) to the mix: http://www.landrigan.com/TheLandriganMonthlyNovember2010.pdf .

    G. B. Landrigan
    Landrigan & Company, Realtors
    55 Monument Circle #810

  • Average Price is meaningless.
    You write: "One bright spot in the residential market has been average sale prices. Through November, the average sale price of a home sold in central Indiana has been $150,130, up 8.2 percent from the same 11-month period of 2009, the report said."

    The average sales price has NOTHING to do with the value of specific properties. It simply means that fewer lower-priced homes sold than in the same period last year. It does NOT mean - as it is often implied - that individual home values are on the rise.

    Here's a brief explanation. Though this video addresses Median prices, it also applies to Average pricing.


    Joe Shoemaker \ Principal Broker, REALTOR�®
    MacDuff Realty Group

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Aaron is my fav!

  2. Let's see... $25M construction cost, they get $7.5M back from federal taxpayers, they're exempt from business property tax and use tax so that's about $2.5M PER YEAR they don't have to pay, permitting fees are cut in half for such projects, IPL will give them $4K under an incentive program, and under IPL's VFIT they'll be selling the power to IPL at 20 cents / kwh, nearly triple what a gas plant gets, about $6M / year for the 150-acre combined farms, and all of which is passed on to IPL customers. No jobs will be created either other than an handful of installers for a few weeks. Now here's the fun part...the panels (from CHINA) only cost about $5M on Alibaba, so where's the rest of the $25M going? Are they marking up the price to drive up the federal rebate? Indy Airport Solar Partners II LLC is owned by local firms Johnson-Melloh Solutions and Telemon Corp. They'll gross $6M / year in triple-rate power revenue, get another $12M next year from taxpayers for this new farm, on top of the $12M they got from taxpayers this year for the first farm, and have only laid out about $10-12M in materials plus installation labor for both farms combined, and $500K / year in annual land lease for both farms (est.). Over 15 years, that's over $70M net profit on a $12M investment, all from our wallets. What a boondoggle. It's time to wise up and give Thorium Energy your serious consideration. See http://energyfromthorium.com to learn more.

  3. Markus, I don't think a $2 Billion dollar surplus qualifies as saying we are out of money. Privatization does work. The government should only do what private industry can't or won't. What is proven is that any time the government tries to do something it costs more, comes in late and usually is lower quality.

  4. Some of the licenses that were added during Daniels' administration, such as requiring waiter/waitresses to be licensed to serve alcohol, are simply a way to generate revenue. At $35/server every 3 years, the state is generating millions of dollars on the backs of people who really need/want to work.

  5. I always giggle when I read comments from people complaining that a market is "too saturated" with one thing or another. What does that even mean? If someone is able to open and sustain a new business, whether you think there is room enough for them or not, more power to them. Personally, I love visiting as many of the new local breweries as possible. You do realize that most of these establishments include a dining component and therefore are pretty similar to restaurants, right? When was the last time I heard someone say "You know, I think we have too many locally owned restaurants"? Um, never...